The Precarious Balloon: An Expert Analysis of Earth System Tipping Points and the Future of Human Civilization

Introduction: Earth as a System Under Unprecedented Pressure

This report adopts the useful metaphor of the Earth system as a single 'balloon' as its framework for strategic analysis. The Earth system is like a complex, pressurized entity that has, for millennia, maintained a stable equilibrium of internal pressures—climate, ecosystems, and biogeochemical cycles. However, anthropogenic pressures, centered on greenhouse gas emissions, are continuously inflating this balloon, stretching its surface to, and in some cases beyond, its structural limits. This report will systematically analyze the thinnest, most stressed parts of this balloon, the sharpness of the needles that threaten it, and the cascading consequences of a rupture.

The concept of a 'Tipping Point' is a formal scientific term, defined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as a critical threshold at which a system undergoes an abrupt and irreversible reorganization.¹ When first introduced some 20 years ago, such 'large-scale discontinuities' were considered possible only in extreme scenarios of more than 5°C of warming above pre-industrial levels. However, the latest research, including the IPCC Special Reports of 2018 and 2019, warns that this critical risk threshold lies at a much lower level of 1–2°C of warming, clarifying that this threat is not a distant possibility but an immediate, tangible danger.³

The purpose of this report is to provide a comprehensive, evidence-based assessment of ten key questions regarding the stability of the Earth system. This is not merely an academic exercise; its goal is to provide the strategic analysis necessary for high-level policy decisions and contingency planning in the face of an existential risk.

Chapter 1: The Thinnest Part of the Balloon: Earth's Most Vulnerable Systems

This chapter dissects the key subsystems of the Earth that exhibit non-linear characteristics and are most vulnerable to abrupt, irreversible change. These are the 'thinnest parts' of the balloon, where pressure is concentrated and the likelihood of rupture is highest.

1.1 The Cryosphere: The World's Melting Refrigerator

Greenland Ice Sheet

This massive reservoir of ice is being destabilized by a powerful positive feedback loop. As the bright, reflective ice melts, it exposes darker ocean or land, which absorbs more solar radiation, accelerating further melting.⁵ The Greenland Ice Sheet contains enough freshwater to raise global sea levels by approximately 7.² meters.⁵ Two critical thresholds based on cumulative carbon emissions have been identified: one at 1,000 gigatons of carbon (GtC), which would trigger the collapse of the southern section, and another at 2,500 GtC, which would lead to the permanent and irreversible loss of nearly the entire ice sheet. Humanity has already emitted approximately 500 GtC, meaning we are halfway to the first tipping point.⁶ The melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet is already the single largest contributor to annual sea-level rise, accounting for 20% of the total.⁷

West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS)

Unlike Greenland, the WAIS is primarily being destabilized from below. Warming ocean currents are melting the ice shelves that buttress the main body of the ice sheet from underneath.⁵ The WAIS is particularly vulnerable because most of it rests on bedrock that is below sea level. Its collapse is considered possible within the 1.5–2°C warming range and could raise sea levels by more than 5 meters over centuries to millennia.¹ Some studies argue that its collapse has already begun and is now irreversible, regardless of future emissions scenarios.⁹ The Thwaites Glacier, known as the 'Doomsday Glacier,' is a key point of failure; its supporting ice shelf could collapse within the next 3 to 5 years, which would dramatically accelerate the rate of loss for the entire glacier.¹¹

Arctic Sea Ice and Permafrost

Summer Arctic sea ice plays a critical role in maintaining the Earth's reflectivity (albedo). Projections suggest that the Arctic could be completely ice-free in the summer as early as the 2030s 5, which would be a major tipping point amplifying Arctic warming. The Arctic is already warming at 3 to 4 times the global average rate.⁵ This accelerated warming is thawing permafrost, which could release vast amounts of methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) equivalent to twice the amount of carbon currently in the atmosphere.¹ This acts as a 'threat multiplier,' creating another powerful feedback loop that drives further warming.⁷

1.2 The Biosphere: The Dying Lungs and Reefs of the Planet

Amazon Rainforest

The Amazon is a system that generates its own rainfall through evapotranspiration. Deforestation and climate change-induced droughts are disrupting this cycle, pushing the ecosystem toward a tipping point where it could irreversibly transition to a dry savanna.¹⁴ This would not only cause a massive loss of biodiversity but could also release up to 370 billion tons of CO₂ equivalent stored in its soils and biomass into the atmosphere.¹⁴ Originally projected to cross a tipping point around 2100, recent studies suggest that 10–47% of the forest could collapse by 2050.¹⁵ The threshold was thought to be 20–25% deforestation, but with 15% already gone and another 17% degraded, it is possible the tipping point zone has already been entered.¹⁵ Parts of the Amazon have already switched to being net emitters of carbon.¹⁶

Warm-Water Coral Reefs

These ecosystems are extremely sensitive to ocean temperature and acidity. Mass bleaching events are now routine. The thermal threshold for coral survival is estimated at around 1.2°C of warming; as the world has already surpassed 1.4°C, it is highly likely this tipping point has already been passed.¹⁷ At 1.5°C of warming, 70–90% of coral reefs are projected to disappear, and at 2°C, they will be virtually eliminated. This is considered one of the first major systems to have clearly crossed an irreversible threshold.¹

1.3 Ocean-Atmosphere Circulation: The Planet's Slowing Heartbeat

Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC)

This massive ocean current system, of which the Gulf Stream is a part, plays a crucial role in regulating the climate of multiple continents by transporting heat from the tropics northward.¹⁹ The circulation is driven by the sinking of dense, salty water in the North Atlantic. A large influx of cold, low-salinity freshwater from the melting Greenland Ice Sheet disrupts this sinking mechanism, weakening the current.²⁰ While the IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report assessed a collapse in the 21st century as unlikely 21, more recent studies project a possible collapse as early as 2025 to 2095, with some models suggesting a risk of collapse within the next decade.¹⁹ The scientific debate is now shifting from if it will collapse to when.²³ An AMOC collapse would trigger catastrophic and abrupt climate shifts, including a rapid cooling of Europe (a 3–8°C drop), severe droughts, a shift in monsoons affecting billions of people, and a rapid rise in sea level along the U.S. East Coast.⁷

Table 1: Summary of Major Earth System Tipping Elements

Tipping Element	Estimated Temperature Threshold (°C, vs. Pre-industrial)	Tipping Timescale	Key Global Impact	Current Status / Rationale
Greenland Ice Sheet	1.5°C (likely), 1.0–3.0°C	Gradual but irreversible (centuries-millennia)	7.2m sea-level rise	Accelerated melting, halfway to first threshold 6
West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS)	1.5–2.0°C	Gradual but irreversible (centuries-millennia)	>5m sea-level rise	Irreversible retreat may have begun 9
Amazon Rainforest	1.5–2.0°C (linked with deforestation)	Abrupt (decades)	Massive CO₂ release, biodiversity collapse	Signs of resilience loss, possibly in tipping zone 15
Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC)	1.4–4.0°C	Abrupt (decades)	Abrupt shift in Northern Hemisphere climate	Weakening observed, collapse timing under debate 23
Warm-Water Coral Reefs	1.2°C (already passed)	Abrupt (decades)	Global marine biodiversity collapse	Tipping point definitively passed 17
Permafrost Thaw	1.5°C (likely)	Gradual but irreversible	Massive methane/CO₂ feedback loop	Thawing accelerating due to Arctic warming 7

Chapter 2: The Tip of the Needle: Defining the Thresholds of Collapse

The 1.5°C 'Guardrail'

The Paris Agreement's 1.5°C target is not a political slogan but a scientific threshold identified as the point where the risk of triggering multiple tipping points increases dramatically.²⁵ Studies indicate that reaching 1.5°C makes the collapse of the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets, widespread coral reef death, and abrupt permafrost thaw significantly more likely.¹

The 2.0°C 'Point of No Return'

A 2°C rise is widely recognized as the boundary beyond which cascading collapses become highly probable, potentially locking the planet into a 'Hothouse Earth' trajectory.³ The risk of tipping events does not increase linearly; it accelerates sharply past 1.5°C, entering a 'danger zone' around 2°C.²⁸

Atmospheric CO₂ Concentration

Temperature is the symptom; CO₂ concentration is the underlying cause. A level of 450 ppm is considered roughly equivalent to the 2°C target.²⁷ Current concentrations have already surpassed 420 ppm and continue to rise.¹⁵ The Amazon's tipping point, for example, is linked to temperature and deforestation, but it is exacerbated by rising CO₂ levels. While CO₂ has a fertilizing effect on plants, it does not offset the stress from drought.¹⁴

Current Situation - Breaching the Threshold

The 1.5°C threshold is no longer a future possibility. Multiple analyses show that in 2023-2024, the world temporarily surpassed 1.5°C of warming for the first time.²⁹ While a single year's breach does not mean a permanent failure of the Paris Agreement goal, it is an unmistakable signal that we are now operating within the 'activation zone' of major tipping points. The IPCC projects that under current policies, the world will permanently cross the 1.5°C line in the early 2040s.³

Focusing on the global average temperature can mask the extreme regional deviations that actually trigger tipping points. The Arctic is warming 3 to 4 times faster than the global average.⁵ This localized, amplified warming is the direct mechanism destabilizing the Greenland Ice Sheet, sea ice, and permafrost. Therefore, when the global average temperature rises by 1.5°C, the Arctic's temperature could rise by 4.5°C or more, far exceeding the stability thresholds of its regional systems. This suggests that global targets like 1.5°C are actually conservative and may not be sufficient to protect hyper-sensitive regional tipping points. In other words, the 'needle' is piercing specific points with much greater force than the average suggests.

Chapter 3: The Nature of the Rupture: A Sudden 'Burst' or a Slow 'Leak'?

This chapter directly addresses the question of collapse dynamics, distinguishing between abrupt, catastrophic events and slow but equally irreversible decline.

Sudden Collapse ('Burst')

Some systems are prone to rapid, non-linear state shifts.

• An AMOC collapse is a prime example. Paleoclimatic records show that the AMOC can shut down in as little as a decade, causing temperatures in the North Atlantic region to plummet by 10–15°C in a very short period.19 This would be a 'burst' with immediate, civilization-altering consequences.
• The Amazon dieback could also proceed rapidly once the drought-feedback cycle begins, transforming vast areas within decades.15

Irreversible Decline ('Slow Leak')

Other systems are characterized by immense inertia. Once they cross a tipping point, their decline cannot be stopped, but the process unfolds over long timescales.

• The Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets are prime examples of this 'zombie' dynamic. Even if global temperatures were stabilized at 1.5°C, these ice sheets are already committed to a multi-century or multi-millennial melt process to reach a new, smaller equilibrium state.1 The 'burst' was the moment the threshold was crossed; the 'leak' is the subsequent centuries of sea-level rise.
• This distinction is critical for policy. Preventing an AMOC 'burst' is a matter of urgent, short-term crisis management, whereas dealing with the 'slow leak' of sea-level rise is a multi-generational challenge of adaptation.

Has the Needle Already Pierced the Balloon?

This question explores the concept of lag effects in the system.

• Evidence for 'Yes': For several systems, the answer is likely yes. Coral reefs have already passed their thermal limit of 1.2°C.17 The West Antarctic Ice Sheet may be in a state of irreversible retreat.9 The Amazon is showing signs of resilience loss and may have crossed its deforestation/degradation threshold.15 The fact that we have already temporarily breached 1.5°C means we have tested the balloon's integrity at a critical pressure level.29
• Lag Effects: The Earth system has thermal and physical inertia. The warming we experience today is the result of emissions from decades ago. The full impact of today's CO₂ concentrations has not yet been realized. This means that further warming is already 'baked in' or 'in the pipeline.' We may have already triggered collapses whose full effects will only become apparent in decades or centuries. The balloon may be fatally compromised, but it is taking time for the surface to fully tear.

The distinction between a 'burst' and a 'leak' creates a dangerous psychological and political trap. A threat that unfolds slowly over centuries, like sea-level rise, is harder to mobilize public action against than a sudden, immediate catastrophe, no matter how severe its ultimate outcome. Human cognitive systems evolved to respond to immediate, visible threats like a predator or a fire.³² A 'slow leak' like sea-level rising a few millimeters per year does not trigger the same level of urgent response, despite its inevitable and catastrophic endpoint.⁷ This is a form of 'normalcy bias'.³³ Political systems with short election cycles are incentivized to focus on short-term crises ('bursts') and postpone action on long-term problems ('leaks'). The very nature of the ice sheet tipping points thus makes them politically convenient to ignore, creating an intergenerational injustice where the inaction of the current generation guarantees the catastrophe of future ones. This is a fundamental failure of risk perception.

Chapter 4: Domino Cascade Collapse: How the Failure of One System Topples Another

This chapter moves beyond the collapse of individual systems to analyze the systemic risk of a 'tipping cascade,' where the entire system unravels in a chain reaction.

Interconnected Earth Systems

Tipping elements are not isolated. They are deeply interconnected through flows of energy and matter.³⁴ Most of these interactions tend to be destabilizing.³⁶ The 2023 Global Tipping Points Report explicitly warned that crossing one of the five most imminent tipping points could trigger others in a "destructive domino effect".³⁸

Analysis of a Potential Cascade Scenario

1. Domino 1: Arctic Warming and Greenland Melt: Amplified warming in the Arctic 5 accelerates the melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet.
2. Domino 2: AMOC Slowdown/Collapse: The massive influx of cold, fresh water from Greenland disrupts the density-driven sinking in the North Atlantic, weakening or shutting down the AMOC.20
3. Domino 3: Amazon Dieback: An AMOC collapse would abruptly alter atmospheric circulation, shifting tropical rain belts southward. This would cause severe and persistent drought in the Amazon basin, accelerating its transition to savanna.7
4. Domino 4: Global Warming Amplification: The collapse of the Amazon would release a huge amount of CO₂, and the loss of Arctic sea ice would reduce the Earth's albedo. Both effects act as powerful amplifying feedbacks, further raising global temperatures and increasing the likelihood of triggering additional tipping points, such as permafrost thaw or the collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet.1

Risk Assessment

The probability of a cascade occurring increases dramatically with rising temperatures. Even at warming levels of 1.5–2.0°C, a cascade on a centuries-long timescale cannot be ruled out. Beyond 2.0°C, it could occur much faster, involving rapid tipping elements like the AMOC.³⁷ The total risk is therefore far greater than the sum of the individual risks.

The existence of cascade risk means that standard climate models, such as those used in IPCC reports, may be systematically underestimating the true scope of the climate threat. Many state-of-the-art climate models do not fully integrate the complex interactions and feedback loops between all major tipping elements.³⁵ This is because it is computationally expensive and scientifically uncertain. Their projections of future warming and impacts may therefore assume a more stable, linear Earth system than exists in reality. This suggests that even the official projections, which are already dire, may be a 'best-case scenario' that neglects the possibility of abrupt, self-amplifying, and catastrophic system collapse. For policymakers, this is a critical piece of information: official risk assessments are likely not conservative, and the 'tail risk' of a deadly cascade is higher than the models explicitly show. This strongly supports policymaking based on the precautionary principle.

Chapter 5: The Aftermath: A Portrait of Civilization After System Collapse

This chapter provides a scenario-based analysis of the concrete consequences of an abrupt tipping event, such as an AMOC collapse, or a cascade, translating abstract science into the reality of societal breakdown.

5.1 The First Months: System Shock and Disintegration

• Immediate Impacts: An AMOC collapse would trigger immediate and severe weather changes. Europe would plunge into a suddenly colder and drier climate, facing immediate agricultural collapse.7 Monsoon failures would devastate agriculture in Asia and Africa.41
• Supply Chain Collapse: 'Just-in-time' global supply chains for food, medicine, and energy would shatter. Food exports from breadbasket regions would cease, causing immediate shortages and panic in import-dependent nations.42
• Financial and Energy Crises: The simultaneous collapse of agricultural, insurance, and real estate markets would trigger a financial meltdown unlike any in history. Energy grids would fail due to extreme weather and the breakdown of fuel supply chains.38

5.2 The First Years: Resource Wars and Mass Migration

• Famine and Water Scarcity: Widespread crop failures would lead to global famine. Shifting rainfall patterns would cause extreme water shortages, triggering conflicts over shared river basins.44
• Mass Migration ('Climate Refugees'): Billions of people would be forcibly displaced from newly uninhabitable regions, such as inundated coastal zones and drought-stricken farmlands. This would create an unprecedented migration crisis, overwhelming any remaining state structures.38 This is a primary concern for national security agencies like the U.S. Department of Defense.46
• Political Disintegration and Conflict: Governments unable to provide basic needs like food and security would lose legitimacy and collapse. This would create power vacuums, leading to widespread conflict between communities, warlords, and state remnants over dwindling resources like arable land and fresh water.44 The U.S. Department of Defense has long modeled scenarios where climate change acts as a 'threat multiplier,' exacerbating existing instabilities and leading to state failure.46
• Pathogen Emergence: Thawing permafrost could release ancient, dormant pathogens (e.g., anthrax-like bacteria) to which modern humans have no immunity.45 This has the potential to unleash new pandemics on a world with no public health infrastructure to combat them.

5.3 The Long-Term Outlook: A Post-Apocalyptic Landscape

• Sociological Analysis: Drawing on post-apocalyptic studies 50, this report explores the likely social structures to emerge after collapse. These include small, fortified communities, a breakdown of modern ethics in favor of survival-based morality, and the loss of complex technical knowledge.53
• New Power Structures: Surviving populations would likely organize into smaller, more localized, and often authoritarian structures centered on the control of essential resources like water or defensible territory.50
• The End of 'Civilization': The complex, globally integrated civilization we know would cease to exist. Humanity would be thrown back to a pre-industrial or even more primitive state in a depleted and hostile environment. The central question would shift from 'progress' to mere 'survival'.54

The primary threat of climate collapse is not the environmental change itself, but the secondary effect of social collapse. The breakdown of human systems—governments, markets, supply chains—would be faster and more lethal for the majority of the world's population than the direct physical impacts. A farmer in Europe whose crops fail due to an AMOC-induced drought 7 does not die directly because it isn't raining. He is threatened by the economic collapse of his farm, the failure of the government to provide relief, the breakdown of law and order, and the violence that ensues as a hungry populace competes for scarce food. This means that contingency planning cannot focus solely on physical adaptations like sea walls. It must prioritize the resilience of the social and political systems that are the true 'first responders' and points of failure in a systemic crisis. This reframes the problem from an environmental issue to a fundamental challenge of governance and social cohesion.

Chapter 6: Making a Stronger Balloon: A Critical Evaluation of Technological Fixes

This chapter critically evaluates whether technological interventions are viable solutions to strengthen the Earth system (the 'balloon') or are merely dangerous stopgaps that delay and potentially worsen an inevitable rupture.

6.1 Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): Patching a Leak with Duct Tape

• Function: CCS aims to capture CO₂ from specific emission sources, like power plants, and store it underground.56
• Limitations and Risks:
  • Scale and Cost: The technology is prohibitively expensive and has failed to operate at the required scale. Despite decades of development, global CCS capacity is a tiny fraction of annual emissions.57
  • Technical Uncertainty: There is a significant risk of leakage from storage sites, and the technology itself is energy-intensive, reducing its net mitigation effect.59
  • 'Moral Hazard' of Delay: The greatest risk is that the promise of CCS provides political cover for the fossil fuel industry to delay genuine decarbonization. It creates the illusion of a solution, perpetuating the root problem.57 CCS is a tool to extend the life of fossil fuel infrastructure, not to change the system.
• Assessment: CCS is not a solution to strengthen the balloon. At best, it is a minor measure to patch a small leak from a specific industrial process. At worst, it is a dangerous distraction that encourages us to continue over-inflating the balloon in the belief that a magical fix will save us.

6.2 Solar Radiation Management (SRM): Painting the Balloon to Keep it Cool

• Function: SRM technologies, such as stratospheric aerosol injection, aim to artificially cool the planet by reflecting a fraction of incoming sunlight back into space.61
• Limitations and Risks:
  • 'Termination Shock': SRM is a temporary mask, not a cure. It does nothing to reduce atmospheric CO₂. If an SRM system were deployed and then suddenly stopped—due to war, economic collapse, or technical failure—global temperatures would catastrophically and rapidly rebound to the level dictated by the underlying CO₂ concentration. This is known as 'termination shock'.61 Ecosystems and societies would have no time to adapt.
  • Unpredictable Side Effects: Tampering with the planet's thermostat could have massive, unpredictable consequences, such as disrupting regional rainfall patterns like the Asian monsoon, damaging the ozone layer, and fundamentally altering ecosystems.63
  • Geopolitical Nightmare: Who controls the thermostat? Unilateral deployment of SRM by one nation could benefit itself while causing devastating droughts in a neighboring country, leading to international conflict. No governance regime exists to manage such a technology.61
• Assessment: SRM is not strengthening the balloon. It is akin to painting the outside of a dangerously over-inflated balloon white to stop it from getting hot, while doing nothing about the internal pressure. It introduces a new, even more fragile point of failure—the SRM system itself—and carries profound ethical and geopolitical risks.64

The debate over these technologies reveals a fundamental flaw in our problem-solving approach: a preference for technological 'hacks' rather than addressing the root cause, which is a socio-economic system based on fossil fuels and endless growth. The root cause of the climate crisis is a system of production and consumption that emits vast quantities of greenhouse gases.⁶⁶ Both CCS and SRM are 'end-of-pipe' solutions that attempt to manage the symptoms (CO₂ or warming) rather than the system causing the emissions. This preference exists because addressing the root cause requires deep, disruptive changes to economies, politics, and lifestyles that challenge existing power structures and social norms.⁶⁷ The move toward technological fixes is therefore not just a scientific debate, but a political and ideological one. It represents an attempt to solve the crisis without fundamentally changing the system that created it. It is a form of societal-level denial.

Chapter 7: The Psychology of Paralysis: Why We Hesitate While the Balloon Stretches

This chapter explores the human dimension of the crisis, analyzing why clear and repeated scientific warnings have failed to produce a commensurate response.

7.1 The Individual Level: Cognitive Biases and the Limits of Rationality

• Normalcy Bias: The human brain is wired to assume that things will continue as they have in the past. When faced with an unprecedented threat, people tend to underestimate its likelihood and severity, believing "it can't happen here" or "it won't be that bad".33 This leads to a failure to prepare for low-probability, high-impact events.
• Confirmation Bias: The tendency to seek out and interpret information that confirms pre-existing beliefs. Those skeptical of climate change will selectively focus on contrary data or narratives that reinforce their worldview, while ignoring the overwhelming scientific consensus.32
• Psychological Distance: The impacts of climate change often feel distant in time (affecting future generations) and space (affecting people in other countries), reducing the sense of personal urgency.

7.2 The Societal Level: Inertia and the Problem of Collective Action

• Social and Economic Inertia: Our global economy is like a massive oil tanker built around fossil fuels. Its infrastructure, supply chains, financial markets, and labor force have enormous 'social inertia,' resisting rapid change.66 Powerful vested interests in the fossil fuel industry have also worked to deliberately sow doubt and delay action.68
• The 'Prisoner's Dilemma' of Climate Action: The global nature of the problem creates a classic collective action dilemma. While it is in the collective interest for all nations to decarbonize, it is in each individual nation's short-term economic interest to let other nations bear the cost while it continues to benefit from cheap fossil fuels. The fear of being taken advantage of leads to a suboptimal outcome where no one acts decisively and everyone suffers the consequences.70 This is the 'Nash Equilibrium' of climate inaction.

7.3 The 'Cassandra Complex': The Failure of Scientific Communication

• The myth of Cassandra, cursed to make true prophecies that no one believes, is a powerful metaphor for the plight of climate scientists.32 For decades, they have issued increasingly urgent warnings based on robust data, yet these warnings have not translated into sufficient political action.
• This highlights the gap between informing and persuading. Scientific data alone does not automatically change behavior, especially when it conflicts with powerful economic interests and deep-seated cognitive biases.32

The barriers to climate action are not primarily technical or economic; they are rooted in human psychology and political science. We have the tools to solve the problem, but we lack the collective psychological and political will to use them. Renewable energy technologies are mature and cost-effective. Economic models show the transition is feasible. Yet the transition is not happening fast enough.³¹ The key identified obstacles are cognitive biases (normalcy bias), vested interests (the fossil fuel lobby), and collective action problems (the prisoner's dilemma).³³ The climate crisis is therefore less a scientific problem and more a 'wicked problem' of human behavior, governance, and social change. Effective strategies must address these psychological and political barriers not as secondary considerations, but as the central challenge.

Chapter 8: The Calculus of Risk, Probability, and Choice

This chapter applies concepts from behavioral economics to explore how societal decision-making might change if the probability of collapse were known with certainty.

Human Perception of Risk

Humans are notoriously poor at processing risk, especially 'tail risks'—low-probability, high-consequence events.⁷³ We tend to underestimate catastrophic risks like climate collapse while overestimating more familiar, lower-impact risks.⁷⁶ Risk is defined as the product of probability and impact (Risk = Likelihood × Impact).⁷⁷ Given the catastrophic impact of climate collapse, even a low probability should translate into an extremely high risk score, demanding immediate action.

Scenario 1: 1% Probability of Collapse

At this level, the risk would likely be treated like other 'tail risks' in finance or insurance: acknowledged by experts but largely ignored in public policy and daily life. It would be subject to normalcy bias: "It's only a 1% chance; it won't happen".³³ This is arguably close to our current situation.

Scenario 2: 10% Probability of Collapse

This is a significant, tangible risk that is difficult to ignore. It is equivalent to playing Russian roulette with a ten-chamber revolver. At this level, major changes would occur. The insurance industry would begin to collapse as the risk becomes uninsurable. Financial markets would price in the risk, devaluing coastal property and fossil fuel assets. A serious, though perhaps still insufficient, policy response would emerge.

Scenario 3: 50% Probability of Collapse

A coin toss on the end of global civilization. At this point, the 'normal' functioning of society would cease. The response would shift from mitigation to emergency preparedness and panic. Mass population movements from vulnerable areas, resource hoarding, and the collapse of long-term societal projects would occur. The primary focus of all governance would become immediate survival. The 'Deep Adaptation' agenda would become mainstream policy.

The lack of a clear, universally accepted probability figure for collapse is a key enabler of inaction. Uncertainty becomes a weapon to justify delay. Climate models present a range of possible outcomes, not a single prediction. This scientific uncertainty, inherent in complex systems modeling, is exploited by opponents of climate action to argue that the threat is unproven and therefore action is not justified.⁶⁹ This frames the debate as a binary choice between 'certain economic costs' (acting now) and 'uncertain future benefits' (avoiding collapse). Behavioral economics shows that humans have a strong preference for avoiding certain, immediate losses over securing uncertain future gains (Prospect Theory).⁷⁶ Thus, the very structure of scientific uncertainty, when filtered through human cognitive biases and political messaging, creates a powerful systemic bias in favor of inaction. A known 10% risk would be more effective at triggering action than an ambiguous, uncertain risk that could be 5% or could be 50%.

Chapter 9: Life After the Burst: Possible Scenarios for Human Survival

This chapter looks beyond the collapse to what comes after, exploring frameworks for navigating a post-collapse world and the potential forms human society might take.

The 'Deep Adaptation' Framework

Proposed by Jem Bendell, this agenda argues that societal collapse is now either inevitable or highly likely, and that our focus must shift from prevention to adapting to a radically different future.⁷⁹ It is structured around four 'R's:

• Resilience: What do we most value that we want to keep, and how can we do so? (e.g., knowledge preservation, local food systems)
• Relinquishment: What do we need to let go of so as not to make matters worse? (e.g., expectations of consumerism, global supply chains)
• Restoration: What can we bring back to help us through these difficult times? (e.g., community-level decision-making, traditional ecological knowledge)
• Reconciliation: With what, and with whom, can we make peace as we face our collective mortality? (e.g., conflict resolution, finding meaning beyond material progress) 81

Sociological Models of Post-Collapse Society

• Fortress World: A scenario where a small, wealthy, and powerful elite retreats into well-resourced, heavily armed enclaves, leaving the majority of humanity to chaos and deprivation. This reflects a world of extreme inequality and militarized borders.
• Localized Agrarianism: A return to smaller, more self-sufficient communities based on local agriculture. This would entail a massive population decline and loss of technological capacity but could be a stable long-term survival model for pockets of humanity.
• Nomadic Foraging: In the most hostile environments, such as newly desertified regions, human groups might revert to a nomadic lifestyle, scavenging resources from the ruins of the old world.50

Key Survival Challenges

• A Hostile Environment: The post-collapse world would not be a pristine wilderness. It would be a planet with a fundamentally altered and often hostile climate, depleted resources, and shattered ecosystems.83
• Loss of Knowledge: The ability to maintain and transmit complex scientific and technical knowledge would be a critical challenge. Without the industrial base to support it, most modern technology would become unusable 'magic' from the past.55
• Genetic Diversity: If the human population is reduced to small, isolated groups, maintaining genetic diversity would be a challenge for the long-term viability of the species.83

The very concept of 'survival' must be redefined. It is not about preserving modern civilization in a bunker, but about the ability of the human species to adapt and continue in a much harsher new reality. The most important survival traits may not be technological prowess, but social cohesion and adaptability. Post-apocalyptic fiction often focuses on lone survivors or violent gangs.⁵¹ However, anthropological evidence suggests that the success of the human species is based on cooperation and social organization. The communities most likely to survive a collapse scenario may not be those with the most weapons, but those with the strongest internal social bonds, the most effective systems of collective decision-making, and the most adaptive knowledge of their local environment.⁵³ Frameworks like Deep Adaptation, with their emphasis on community, reconciliation, and the preservation of core human values, may therefore represent not just a philosophical exercise, but the most practical survival strategy for the human species.

Conclusion: From Metaphor to Mandate

Synthesis of Findings

This report has presented a comprehensive body of evidence that the Earth system—our 'balloon'—is demonstrably fragile. We have identified the thinnest parts of the balloon (the cryosphere, biosphere, and AMOC), the sharpness of the needle (the 1.5–2.0°C thresholds, which we are now entering), and the catastrophic, cascading nature of a potential rupture.

The Mandate for Action

The analysis shows that the window of opportunity to prevent crossing the thresholds of multiple, interacting tipping points is closing with extreme rapidity. The psychological, political, and economic inertia that stands in the way of action is not a valid reason for inaction, but the central strategic challenge that must be overcome.

Final Strategic Assessment

The metaphor of the balloon is useful but ultimately insufficient. A balloon is a passive object. Humanity is still the active agent holding the pump. The choice is not between a balloon that bursts and one that does not. The choice is whether to continue recklessly pumping until a catastrophic, uncontrolled rupture becomes inevitable, or to make the immediate, transformative decision to stop pumping, release the pressure, and begin the difficult work of repairing the damage already done. The findings of this report constitute an unequivocal mandate for the latter.

참고 자료

1. Tipping points in the climate system - Wikipedia, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipping_points_in_the_climate_system
2. 기후변화 2014 - IPCC, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ar5_SYR_Korean_Edition_Longer_report.pdf
3. 지구 온난화 비상 사태 선포해야 할까 - 사이언스타임즈, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.sciencetimes.co.kr/?p=199155
4. “기후변화 급변침 멀잖아…여러 현상 상호작용 도미노” - 한겨레, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/science/science_general/919286.html
5. [파란통신] 세계기후뉴스 톺아보기_지구는 지금 티핑포인트에 다다른 ..., 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://greenparan.org/898070451/?bmode=view&idx=21614053
6. 그린란드 빙상은 돌이킬 수 없는 융해점에 가까워지고 있어 : r/Futurology - Reddit, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/123zxg2/the_greenland_ice_sheet_is_close_to_a_melting/?tl=ko
7. 570_머리기사_기후변화 임계점과 정책함의점_송용권.hwp, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://overseas.mofa.go.kr/oecd-ko/brd/m_20806/down.do?brd_id=20131&seq=408&data_tp=A&file_seq=1
8. 남극 빙하 붕괴, 티핑 포인트 넘었다 - 사이언스타임즈, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.sciencetimes.co.kr/?p=219983
9. "남극 빙붕, 이미 늦어...파리협정 달성하더라도 서남극 빙상 녹아내린다" 연구결과 나와, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.dailyenews.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=30978
10. [시사체크! 키워드] 대륙 넓은 지역 덮는 빙하… “서남극 빙상 붕괴 억제, 이미 늦었다” - 조선일보, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.chosun.com/kid/kid_literacy/kid_sisanews/2023/11/12/5ZP7PXE5GFOEUYPUU5LIJW4SAY/
11. 서남극 빙하 소멸의 시작? "거대 빙붕, 5년 내 붕괴 우려", 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.newspenguin.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=10204
12. [동향]임계점에 다다른 북극…화재 더 잦아진다 - 사이언스온, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://scienceon.kisti.re.kr/srch/selectPORSrchTrend.do?cn=SCTM00249051
13. IPCC, 기후 티핑 포인트에 대한 경고 수위 높여, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.apcc21.org/file/download?id=2ea17a22-9d6b-11ee-b2e0-771d1f55f3bd
14. 아마존 숲은 지구 허파가 아니다 - 한겨레, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/environment/908522.html
15. “아마존 열대우림 2050년 붕괴 위기”…15% 이미 소실, 티핑포인트 ..., 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://greenium.kr/news/30871/
16. 아마존 열대우림 20%, CO2 흡수 대신 배출…벌채·화재 영향 - 뉴시스, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://mobile.newsis.com/view/NISX20200212_0000916001
17. 지구 온난화로 뜨거워진 바다...생존 임계점 산호초 초과 - Daum, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://v.daum.net/v/20251013162705000
18. "산호초에 너무 더운 바다…지구 온난화로 생존 임계점 넘어" | 연합뉴스, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20251013120500009
19. 빠르면 2025년 대서양 해류순환 붕괴 시작, 다가오는 기후재앙 - 민중 ..., 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://vop.co.kr/A00001637542.html
20. “기후재앙 막기 위해 5억 달러로 빙하 유실 막는다?”…과학계서 촉발된 지구공학기술 논쟁, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://greenium.kr/news/30439/
21. 지구 기후 조절하는 '대서양 해류 순환 시스템' 이르면 2030년대 후반 붕괴 경고 - 그리니엄, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://greenium.kr/news/55171/
22. '해류순환 시스템 붕괴 예측' 논문 나왔다... "정말 무섭다" - 오마이뉴스, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ohmynews.com/NWS_Web/View/at_pg.aspx?CNTN_CD=A0002947747
23. “대서양 해류 순환 체계, 이르면 2030년대 붕괴”｜동아일보, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.donga.com/news/People/article/all/20240804/126329114/2
24. 대서양 해류 순환 붕괴 경고 상향 “10~20년 내 임계점 도달, 기후 재앙 임박”, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.esgbusinessreview.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=5668
25. 지구의 마지막 경고: 1.5℃ 임계점 지키는 결단 필요하다(에너지신문) > 인사이트 | 한국사회책임투자포럼, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.kosif.org/bbs/board.php?bo_table=s4_3&wr_id=67&page=4
26. [환경칼럼] 기후재난의 티핑 포인트 1.5도를 막아라 - 천지일보, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.newscj.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=892020
27. 140413_보도자료(IPCC 5차평가보고서).hwp, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.kma.go.kr/kma/flexer/view.jsp?mode=download&bid=press&num=1192808&fno=1&callback=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kma.go.kr%2Fkma%2Fnews%2Fpress.jsp&ses=USERSESSION&k=ATC201404151045021_08f1884a-2d8a-4bec-a006-cc01b4dcad85.hwp
28. 0.1℃ 오를 때마다 와르르...도미노처럼 무너질 지구? - 뉴스펭귄, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.newspenguin.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=19684
29. 지구 온난화 1.5℃ 돌파…“기후변화 임계점 맞았나 - 그리니엄, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://greenium.kr/news/60972/
30. [동향]임계 상승 온도 1.5도, 벌써 깨지고 있다 - 사이언스온, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://scienceon.kisti.re.kr/srch/selectPORSrchTrend.do?cn=SCTM00255442
31. IPCC ②: 9년만의 기후변화 종합보고서 “주요 지표 매우 심각”…감축계획 부족 - 그리니엄, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://greenium.kr/news/24160/
32. [기고] 카산드라의 저주, 어떻게 기후위기를 넘어설 수 있는가, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://vop.co.kr/A00001651651.html
33. 인적 요인과 환경적 요인(2), 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://kiha21.or.kr/monthly/2019/10/2019_10_05_s378.pdf
34. 지구 환경 지표 8개 중 7개 '위험 구역' 진입…“연쇄 효과로 인류 생존 위협할 수도” - 그리니엄, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://greenium.kr/news/25723/
35. 2021 기후변화 콜로키움 2회 "인류세 지구 시스템에서 기후와 사회적 티핑 요소 간의 연속적 상호작용 : 위험과 기회 "(조나단 동게스) - 지구와사람, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, http://www.peopleforearth.kr/load.asp?sub_p=board/board&b_code=12&page=1&f_cate=&idx=456&board_md=view
36. Guest post: Exploring the risks of 'cascading' tipping points in a ..., 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.carbonbrief.org/guest-post-exploring-the-risks-of-cascading-tipping-points-in-a-warming-world/
37. Climate tipping point interactions and cascades: a review - ESD, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/15/41/2024/
38. 정치·금융 불안 유발할 '기후 도미노' 임박, 연구진 "긍정적 티핑포인트 ..., 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.businesspost.co.kr/BP?command=article_view&num=335461
39. en.wikipedia.org, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipping_points_in_the_climate_system#:~:text=four%20tipping%20elements.-,Crossing%20a%20threshold%20in%20one%20part%20of%20the%20climate%20system,will%20significantly%20alter%20ocean%20circulation.
40. Climate tipping point interactions and cascades: a review - Earth System Dynamics, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.earth-system-dynamics.net/about/news_and_press/2024-01-26_climate-tipping-point-interactions-and-cascades-a-review.html
41. 대서양의 이상 신호, 기후위기의 경고음 - 내외신문, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, http://www.naewaynews.com/sub_read_amp.html?uid=319170
42. [기후위기] 대서양 해류 시스템 붕괴....전세계 식량난 위기 - 내외신문, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.naewaynews.com/312959
43. Below 1.5°C-KIER TPP - 한국에너지기술연구원, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.kier.re.kr/tpp/energy/A/view/59?contentsName=below3_7&menuId=MENU00963
44. 기후변화와 안보에 대한 국제적 논의 동향과 한국의 ... - 외교안보연구소, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ifans.go.kr/knda/com/fileupload/FileDownloadView.do;jsessionid=IKYf63xH9G-V1wBF6Jl2kCZp.public22?storgeId=c61b04e5-0182-4c75-ad21-828ecacfb855&uploadId=29627228653900&fileSn=1
45. "돌이킬 수 없어" 순식간에 붕괴, 수십 억 명 위협..불길한 전망 나왔다 [반복재생] / YTN 사이언스, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cU78gOsE23U
46. 기후변화가 전쟁을 일으킬 수 있는가? - 국립기상과학원, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, http://www.nims.go.kr/?sub_num=868
47. [동향]국가적 안보와 기후 변화의 위협, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://scienceon.kisti.re.kr/srch/selectPORSrchTrend.do?cn=GT200700747
48. 미·중 협력 가능 분야의 분석과 전망: 기후변화를 중심으로 - 외교안보연구소, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ifans.go.kr/knda/com/fileupload/FileDownloadView.do;jsessionid=p7yMAd8qdEWuqg08NbxR+0yw.public12?storgeId=c61b04e5-0182-4c75-ad21-828ecacfb855&uploadId=26923893481118275&fileSn=1
49. 지구 파산의 위험" 이대로 가다간..전 세계에 닥칠 최악의 시나리오 | 기후 위기 스페셜 [반복재생]/YTN 사이언스 - YouTube, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meiK7DNNXgY
50. 포스트 아포칼립스 - 나무위키, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://namu.wiki/w/%ED%8F%AC%EC%8A%A4%ED%8A%B8%20%EC%95%84%ED%8F%AC%EC%B9%BC%EB%A6%BD%EC%8A%A4
51. [장르] 포스트 아포칼립스에 대해서 - 하울비행, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://hauling.tistory.com/4
52. <침묵의 봄>과 환경 아포칼립스 - SF 생태주의, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://sfecology.tistory.com/entry/%EC%B9%A8%EB%AC%B5%EC%9D%98-%EB%B4%84%EA%B3%BC-%ED%99%98%EA%B2%BD-%EC%95%84%ED%8F%AC%EC%B9%BC%EB%A6%BD%EC%8A%A4
53. 포스트 아포칼립스가 엉터리 인류학에 기반할 때 - SF 생태주의, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://sfecology.tistory.com/entry/%ED%8F%AC%EC%8A%A4%ED%8A%B8-%EC%95%84%ED%8F%AC%EC%B9%BC%EB%A6%BD%EC%8A%A4%EA%B0%80-%EC%97%89%ED%84%B0%EB%A6%AC-%EC%9D%B8%EB%A5%98%ED%95%99%EC%97%90-%EA%B8%B0%EB%B0%98%ED%95%A0-%EB%95%8C
54. 인류 종말 시나리오, 15가지가 관건이다 - 오마이뉴스, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ohmynews.com/NWS_Web/Series/series_premium_pg.aspx?CNTN_CD=A0002948386
55. 포스트 아포칼립스 세계관을 쓰는 팁 : r/writing - Reddit, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.reddit.com/r/writing/comments/b8mbed/advice_for_writing_postpostapocalyptic_worlds/?tl=ko
56. 탄소 포집 및 저장(CCS)이란 무엇인가요? - IBM, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ibm.com/kr-ko/think/topics/carbon-capture-storage
57. 탄소포집, 이용 및 저장 기술(CCUS) 현황 및 문제점, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://21220177.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/21220177/%5BSFOC%20%EC%9D%B4%EC%8A%88%EB%B8%8C%EB%A6%AC%ED%94%84%203%5DCCUS%20%ED%98%84%ED%99%A9%20%EB%B0%8F%20%EB%AC%B8%EC%A0%9C%EC%A0%90.pdf
58. [칼럼] CCUS, 당장은 해답이 될 수 없는 이유 유일한 사후감축 기술, 탄소포집 활용 및 저장(CCUS)테슬라(Tesla) 사의 CEO 일론 머스크는 최근 탄소 포집 기술 경연대회에서 1기가톤의 포집 기술을 - 이슈 브리프 | NEXT group, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://nextgroup.or.kr/ko/research/public/issuebrief/view?post_id=212&page=4&size=10
59. [논문]탄소 포집 및 저장(CCS) 위험 관리 방안 수립 시 사전예방원칙 적용 필요성과 유용성, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://scienceon.kisti.re.kr/srch/selectPORSrchArticle.do?cn=JAKO201415337598864
60. 탄소 공동저장 동향 및 국제협약에서의 시사점 - 에너지경제연구원, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.keei.re.kr/keei/download/focus/ef2403/ef2403_70.pdf
61. 태양지구공학 - 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%ED%83%9C%EC%96%91%EC%A7%80%EA%B5%AC%EA%B3%B5%ED%95%99
62. 기후위기의 시대, 우리는 무엇을 어떻게 해야 하나? - 인문360, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://inmun360.culture.go.kr/content/537.do?mode=view&cid=2372887
63. <37> 태양 지구공학, 솔루션일까 화약고일까? - 네이버 프리미엄콘텐츠, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://contents.premium.naver.com/climateresilience/climateaction/contents/230317204718450xv
64. 기후변화시대의 인권과 정의 - 윤리교육연구 - KISS, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://kiss.kstudy.com/Detail/Ar?key=3908490
65. 유성 자외선 차단제: 태양 복사 수정 - The Ocean Foundation, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://oceanfdn.org/ko/%EC%9C%A0%EC%84%B1-%EC%9E%90%EC%99%B8%EC%84%A0-%EC%B0%A8%EB%8B%A8%EC%A0%9C-%ED%83%9C%EC%96%91-%EB%B3%B5%EC%82%AC-%EC%88%98%EC%A0%95/
66. 사회적 타성: 변화는 왜 이렇게 어려운가? - Greenpeace Korea | 그린피스, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.greenpeace.org/korea/update/18882/blog-etc-50th-anniversary-social-inertia/
67. 기후-생태위기의 원인과 대응: 인간, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://igs.korea.ac.kr/igs/book/search.do?mode=download&articleNo=324629&attachNo=228419&totalNoticeYn=N&totalBoardNo=
68. 눈앞의 위기에 눈감는 국가들 - 캐나다 한국일보, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.koreatimes.net/ArticleViewer/Article/163939
69. [Review] 왜 사람들은 기후 위기에 관심을 가지지 않을까? - 도서 '우리 ..., 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.artinsight.co.kr/news/view.php?no=68054
70. 강의(3) 기후위기와 죄수의 딜레마 – 왜 국제협력은 어려운가? - Verdex AI, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.verdex.kr/%EA%B8%B0%ED%9B%84%EC%9C%84%EA%B8%B0%EC%99%80-%EC%A3%84%EC%88%98%EC%9D%98-%EB%94%9C%EB%A0%88%EB%A7%88-%EC%99%9C-%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5%EC%9D%80-%EC%96%B4%EB%A0%A4%EC%9A%B4/
71. 기후과학자가 저주받은 카산드라라면, 우리는 트로이 시민인가? - 아주경제, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ajunews.com/view/20200423101649168
72. [기후+] 각국 정부, 규제 의무로 산업계 '긍정적인 티핑 포인트' 설정해야 - S-저널, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.s-journal.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=24431
73. [EE칼럼] 에너지시장 '블랙스완'에 철저히 대비해야, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://m.ekn.kr/view.php?key=20211209010001375
74. 꼬리위험, 폭염의 기후 동인 및 극한 현상 예측을 위한 새로운 방법, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, http://climateassessment.nyc/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/NPCC4_TailRiskSummary_KO.pdf
75. [경제용어 나들이] ′꼬리위험(Tail Risk)′ 무슨 말일까? - 알파경제, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://alphabiz.co.kr/news/view/1065602887231489
76. 행동경제학의논거가 소비자정책에주는시사점, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.kca.go.kr/home/board/download.do?fno=10004801&bid=00000018&did=1000789380&menukey=4083
77. 기후위기 '비상사태'…위험하고 긴급하다 - 한겨레, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/science/science_general/957285.html
78. 행동경제학에서 나타난 금융소비자보호정책, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.kiri.or.kr/pdf/%EC%A0%84%EB%AC%B8%EC%9E%90%EB%A3%8C/KIRI_20170428_113535.pdf
79. '심층적응'···사회 붕괴를 대비하는 정의로운 전환 전략일까? / 이정필 소장, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://ecpi.or.kr/column/?bmode=view&idx=13670812
80. 기후 위기, 전시 상황으로 여겨 삶 터전 복구하듯 접근해야 - 중앙일보, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/25192856
81. 기후위기 시대 건강한 삶을 위한 전략, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.kihasa.re.kr/api/kihasa/file/download?seq=24482
82. 심층적응 - 예스24, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://www.yes24.com/product/goods/112066009
83. 둠스데이: 인류멸망 10가지 시나리오 - 나무위키, 10월 21, 2025에 액세스, https://namu.wiki/w/%EB%91%A0%EC%8A%A4%EB%8D%B0%EC%9D%B4:%20%EC%9D%B8%EB%A5%98%EB%A9%B8%EB%A7%9D%2010%EA%B0%80%EC%A7%80%20%EC%8B%9C%EB%82%98%EB%A6%AC%EC%98%A4