Deep Research Archives

Whole-Brain Emulation: A Multidisciplinary Analysis of Technical Feasibility, Philosophical Identity, and Societal Equity

Executive Summary

Whole-brain emulation (WBE), a speculative process that involves scanning a biological brain and recreating its functionality within a computational system, represents one of the most profound technological and philosophical challenges of the 21st century.1 This report provides a comprehensive analysis of WBE, addressing its technical feasibility, the complex questions of identity and consciousness it raises, and its potential societal consequences. The findings indicate that while WBE remains a long-term goal, likely decades away, it is not a matter of a single technological breakthrough but the culmination of advancements across multiple fields, including neuroscience, computing, and nanotechnology.1 The philosophical implications are equally immense, particularly the question of whether a digital copy would constitute the original person or merely a qualitatively identical replica, a dilemma mirrored by the ancient Ship of Theseus paradox.3 Economically, the initial, prohibitively high cost of such an endeavor suggests that WBE would likely emerge as a luxury for a select few, raising significant concerns about a new form of societal stratification where a small, wealthy class could achieve a form of digital immortality.5 The legal and psychological frameworks required to manage this technology are currently non-existent, and society's struggles with managing simpler forms of digital legacy highlight the immense challenges ahead.6 In essence, WBE is not merely a technical pursuit; it is a fundamental challenge to our understanding of life, death, personhood, and equity.

Chapter 1: The Technical and Computational Roadmap to Whole-Brain Emulation

1.1. Defining Whole-Brain Emulation (WBE) and its Core Requirements

Whole-brain emulation (WBE) is a theoretical and ambitious process aimed at creating a complete, functional digital replica of a specific human brain.1 The objective is to reproduce the mental state of an individual in a non-biological substrate, achieving functional and experiential equivalence.2 This concept stands in stark contrast to more rudimentary forms of "digital immortality," which are already commercially available and experiencing rapid market growth.9 These less complex technologies, such as AI-based avatars, are trained on an individual's digital footprint to replicate their voice, personality, and behaviors.9 While they create a lasting digital legacy for communication, they do not purport to be a sentient copy of the original person. WBE, by its very definition, attempts to transcend this by creating a conscious, self-aware entity, a distinction that is philosophically and technically profound. The theoretical roadmap to achieving WBE is often broken down into three fundamental stages: mapping, simulation, and embodiment.10 The first stage, mapping, requires the acquisition of a detailed blueprint of the brain's structure at a high spatial resolution, including all of its complex neuronal connections.1 This blueprint, known as a connectome, is the static data that serves as the foundation for the entire project. The second stage, simulation, involves using this mapped data to build a real-time computational model that emulates the dynamic electrochemical activity of every neuron and their trillions of connections.10 This is the process of bringing the static map to life, making it a functional, thinking entity. The final stage, embodiment, connects this simulated brain to an external environment, allowing it to receive sensory inputs and generate motor outputs, much like a biological brain interacts with a body.5 This final step ensures that the emulation can function as an integrated organism and interact with a simulated or real world.11 The path to WBE will not occur in a vacuum; it is being pre-conditioned by the public's reception of and engagement with lower-fidelity digital technologies. The market for "digital immortality" is already a multi-billion dollar industry, projected to grow to $54.51 billion by 2029.9 This growth is driven by the demand for virtual agents and personalized digital experiences.9 The ethical and psychological challenges currently emerging from these technologies, such as the struggle with a deceased person's unmanaged digital legacy, are setting the social and legal precedents for the far more complex issues that will accompany WBE.7 The report argues that the societal conversation around WBE will be shaped by how humanity navigates these initial battles over digital rights, grief, and the preservation of identity in the coming years.

1.2. Key Technical Hurdles and Progress

The journey to WBE is fraught with immense technical hurdles, which explain the significant discrepancy in expert timelines. The first major challenge is the creation of a comprehensive, high-resolution brain map, or connectome.1 The sheer complexity of the human brain, with its estimated 86 billion neurons and 100 trillion connections, necessitates imaging at a nanoscale resolution of just a few tens of nanometers or less to accurately reconstruct cellular morphology and synapses.13 Current, non-invasive technologies like MRI have a resolution of 1 mm³, and even advanced magnetic resonance microscopy (MRM) is limited to 10-100 micrometers, which is orders of magnitude too large for the task.8 While destructive scanning methods, such as electron microscopy (EM), have achieved the necessary nanoscale resolution, they are currently slow and have only been used to map out tiny fractions of a brain, such as a cubic millimeter of human brain or a fruit fly's brain connectome.8 The raw data from a full human brain map at this resolution would be staggering, potentially requiring over 205.7 exabytes of storage, or even a zettabyte by some estimates.13 The second major barrier lies in the immense computational power and energy efficiency required. The human brain is a marvel of efficiency, operating on just 20 watts of power to perform the equivalent of an exaflop—a billion-billion mathematical operations per second.10 In stark contrast, the world's most powerful supercomputers, while now capable of exaflop computing, require approximately 20 megawatts of power, a million times more than the human brain.15 This is a critical engineering challenge that extends beyond raw processing power, touching on issues of volume, cooling, and energy consumption.10 For instance, a 2013 simulation of just 1% of a human brain using the K computer required 40 minutes to simulate one second of real-time activity and utilized 82,944 processors.16 A promising solution lies in the development of neuromorphic hardware, which mimics the brain's analog, low-power processes.10 These brain-inspired computing systems, which may use "race logic" to solve problems based on timing differences between signals, offer a potential pathway to the required energy efficiency.15 The final, and perhaps most significant, hurdle is the software problem: the modeling of neural dynamics.5 A static map is insufficient; WBE requires an accurate model of the dynamic electrochemical activity of every neuron and synapse.10 This is widely considered the hardest and least understood issue in the WBE roadmap.5 While models like the Hodgkin-Huxley model exist in computational neuroscience 10, they are not yet sophisticated enough to capture the full, nuanced complexity of a living brain's functionality. The successful emulation of the behavior of simulated neurons, both individually and as a population, would need to be indistinguishable from that of the original biological brain given the same environmental input.10

1.3. A Timeline of Possibility: A Synthesis of Expert Predictions

The question of when WBE will be possible elicits a wide range of responses, reflecting a fundamental philosophical and methodological divide between futurists and empirical scientists. Ray Kurzweil, a prominent futurist, predicts that "digital immortality" will be attainable by 2045.14 This optimistic projection is rooted in his "Law of Accelerating Returns," which posits that technological progress, driven by a positive feedback loop, is not linear but super-exponential.18 Kurzweil's model is a top-down, macro-level extrapolation based on an observed trend in computational power, assuming that the processing capacity is the primary bottleneck and that new paradigms will emerge to continue the exponential growth.17 In contrast, the academic and neuroscience communities offer a far more conservative outlook. A survey of neuroscientists placed the median estimate for a successful human WBE at around 2125.19 This cautious timeline stems from a bottom-up, micro-level analysis of the specific, unresolved challenges in biology and engineering.8 The timeline is not dictated by Moore's Law alone but is bottlenecked by the unpredictable pace of discovery in fields like nanoscale scanning and the development of power-efficient hardware.13 The Human Brain Project (HBP), a major EU-funded research initiative that concluded in 2023, confirmed the monumental scale of the task by focusing on building the foundational digital infrastructure for brain research, rather than attempting a full WBE.20 The existence of this divergence in timelines is a crucial point of analysis. The difference is not a disagreement on a specific date, but a disagreement on the nature of the problem itself. The futurist view sees the problem as a single, predictable exponential curve, while the scientific community views it as a series of distinct, complex, and unpredictable engineering and biological breakthroughs. The timeline for WBE is ultimately contingent upon the pace of innovation in areas that are not currently governed by the well-established trends of conventional computing. Table 1.1: WBE Technical Readiness and Timeline

Category Futurist (Kurzweil) View Academic (Neuroscientist) View Projected Timeline By 2045, for "digital immortality".14 Around 2125, for a successful human WBE.19 Primary Basis The Law of Accelerating Returns.18 Empirical data and unsolved biological/engineering problems.19 Rationale Assumes computational power is the main bottleneck and exponential growth will continue across paradigms.17 Acknowledges that the pace of discovery in nanoscale scanning and neuromorphic hardware is unpredictable and not simply an extension of Moore's Law.8 Key Milestones & Progress A $1,000 computer will match the human brain's processing power by 2019, with a thousand-fold increase by 2029.17 Mapping of C. elegans connectome.19 Simulation of 1% of the human brain's cortex.16 The Human Brain Project focused on foundational research infrastructure.20

Chapter 2: The Core Philosophical and Ethical Debates

2.1. The Question of Personal Identity: Is the Uploaded Mind the Same Person?

The most profound philosophical question posed by the prospect of WBE is whether a digital copy of a brain would truly be the original person.3 This query strikes at the heart of our understanding of selfhood and the continuity of consciousness. The challenge is not a new one in philosophical thought; it is a modern iteration of the classic Ship of Theseus paradox.4 The paradox asks whether a ship that has had all of its original planks replaced one by one remains the same ship. Similarly, WBE, particularly the "copy-and-upload" method, would create a qualitatively identical entity with the same memories, personality, and knowledge, but it would arguably not be the numerically identical individual.1 The original biological brain, the "Ship," would still exist, and the digital emulation would be a new "ship" built from a copy of its blueprint, breaking the continuity of the original consciousness. Philosophers typically distinguish between numerical identity (being one and the same individual) and qualitative identity (sharing all the same properties).23 An uploaded mind would be a perfect qualitative duplicate of the original person at the moment of scanning, with all the memories and personality traits intact.1 However, it would not be the same person in the numerical sense because the continuous stream of subjective experience would have been broken. This raises a fundamental dilemma: is identity defined by the continuity of consciousness or by the presence of a qualitatively identical mind? There is no universally accepted answer, and the technology would force society to confront this question on a massive scale.

2.2. The Nature of Consciousness: The "Hard Problem" and its Implications

The debate over personal identity is inextricably linked to the nature of consciousness itself. Mind uploading forces a direct confrontation with the "Hard Problem" of consciousness, a concept articulated by philosopher David Chalmers.3 The Hard Problem asks why we have subjective, felt experiences—the "what it's like" aspect of consciousness—which cannot be explained by merely describing the physical processes of the brain.3 While a WBE might replicate neural activity, it is not guaranteed to replicate the subjective experience of that activity. The research indicates that while some theories offer a potential pathway for digital consciousness, the problem remains a formidable challenge.3 Two prominent theories of consciousness are often invoked in this context. Integrated Information Theory (IIT), proposed by neuroscientist Giulio Tononi, suggests that consciousness arises from a system's ability to integrate information, implying that a sufficiently complex digital simulation could potentially be conscious.3 In contrast, Global Workspace Theory (GWT), developed by psychologist Bernard Baars, posits that consciousness arises from a central, integrated "workspace" of information in the brain.3 While these frameworks provide conceptual tools for analyzing a simulated mind, they do not resolve the Hard Problem. A digital entity could behave as if it is conscious, but without a solution to the Hard Problem, it is impossible to know if it truly has a subjective inner life.1 Table 2.1: Philosophical Frameworks for Identity in WBE

Paradox/Theory Core Question Application to WBE Ship of Theseus Does an object remain the same after all its components have been replaced? 4 The "copy-and-upload" process breaks numerical identity, creating a new entity from the blueprint of the old one, like building a new ship from the original's plans.14 Continuity of Consciousness Is identity dependent on an unbroken, continuous stream of subjective experience? 3 The uploaded mind, while a perfect replica, would not be the same individual because the continuity of consciousness would have been broken during the scanning and transfer process.1 Numerical vs. Qualitative Identity What makes an individual the same person over time? 23 The digital copy would be qualitatively identical (same memories, personality, etc.), but arguably not numerically the same individual, raising questions about which form of identity truly matters.3 Integrated Information Theory (IIT) Does consciousness arise from a system's ability to integrate information? 3 A sufficiently complex digital emulation, with its massive data integration, could theoretically be conscious, suggesting the possibility of a truly sentient digital mind.3

2.3. Ethical and Legal Considerations of Post-Mortem Emulation

Beyond the metaphysical debates, WBE presents a host of practical legal and ethical problems. The legal system is currently ill-equipped to handle the implications of a "digital person," even a non-sentient one.6 Legal scholar Victoria Haneman has argued that the estates of deceased individuals should have the right to digital deletion to prevent "digital resurrection" and give them the "right to be dead".6 This is not an abstract debate; it is a real issue facing families today who must navigate the legal ambiguities of digital inheritance, as most people die without leaving clear instructions for their online accounts.7 The Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act (RUFADAA) allows family members access to accounts but does not prohibit data scraping of a deceased person's digital footprint, a practice that could be used to create an AI-based avatar.6 The advent of WBE would dramatically amplify these existing legal dilemmas. The debate over the legal personhood of a digital entity is a key concern.22 A sentient, uploaded mind would challenge the current legal distinction between a "natural person" (a human) and a "juridical person" (a nonhuman entity like a corporation).24 Would a WBE have the right to privacy? The right to not be deleted? Could it own property or be held liable in a court of law? The legal system's struggle to classify brain organoids—biological tissues with neural activity—highlights its unpreparedness.24 Brain organoids are not considered natural persons because they lack the capacity to integrate a body and are not "born" in the legal sense, but WBE would simulate the integrative functions of an entire person, making the legal classification a far more complex issue.24

Chapter 3: The Societal and Economic Trajectory of WBE

3.1. The Precursor Market: Digital Immortality and Sextech

The future commercialization of WBE will be heavily influenced by the trajectory of its precursor markets, particularly the burgeoning digital immortality and sextech industries. The "digital immortality" market is currently a multi-billion dollar sector, with a value of $27.30 billion in 2024 and a projected growth to $54.51 billion by 2029.9 This rapid expansion is driven by the growing demand for AI-based virtual agents and personalized digital experiences, technologies that are already blurring the line between physical and digital intimacy and providing tools for legacy preservation.27 A parallel market, sextech, provides a powerful case study for the commercial and ethical challenges that await WBE. The market is projected to reach $109.67 billion by 2030, but its growth is constrained by significant commercial barriers, including regulatory and legal uncertainty, data-privacy risks, and payment-processing discrimination.28 Mainstream payment gateways often label erotic businesses as "high-risk," leading to higher fees and service termination.28 In response to this stigma, companies like Realbotix have strategically rebranded their products, shifting their corporate messaging from "sex robots" to "social robots".29 This pivot emphasizes companionship, emotional support, and conversational skills to appeal to a broader audience and mitigate the negative public perception sensationalized by the media.29 The ethical debates surrounding sex robots—concerns about reinforcing gender stereotypes, objectification, and the erosion of consent—are not just academic; they are a direct commercial barrier that the industry is actively working to circumvent.30 This corporate strategy serves as a blueprint for how the WBE industry might navigate its own ethical challenges. The future of WBE will be shaped by how it is framed and marketed to avoid social backlash and ensure commercial viability. The societal and ethical debates are not a side effect of the technology; they are a direct force shaping its development and marketability. Table 3.1: Digital Immortality Market Forecast & Key Drivers

Category Market Value ($ Billion) CAGR (%) Market Size (2024) $27.30 9 N/A Projected Market Value (2025) $31.43 26 15.1% 26 Projected Market Value (2029) $54.51 9 14.8% 9 Key Drivers Growing demand for virtual agents; rising demand for personalized digital experiences.9 N/A Commercialization Barriers Regulatory and legal uncertainty, data-privacy and cybersecurity risks, payment-processing discrimination, material shortages.28 N/A

3.2. WBE: A Privilege for the Elite or a Public Utility?

The user's query about accessibility for the masses is addressed directly by the high cost of the technology. The initial cost of WBE hardware and research would be astronomical. As of the early 2010s, the world's fastest supercomputers cost hundreds of millions of dollars, and even a single, high-end AI-enabled sex doll costs upwards of $13,000.33 The computational power required for WBE is so immense that it would likely require infrastructure on par with the world's most powerful supercomputers, if not more.5 This economic barrier alone suggests that initial access would be limited to a tiny, privileged fraction of the global population, a clear answer to the user's question. The path to democratization, if it exists, would follow the same pattern as other technologies: costs would eventually fall due to mass production and competition, a phenomenon captured by the "Law of Accelerating Returns".18 However, WBE is also a medical procedure, and its access could be limited by ethical review boards and regulatory bodies, not just by cost.6 The initial users would likely be individuals with vast personal wealth, potentially creating a significant chasm between an "emulated class" of immortal, digital people and a "biological underclass" still subject to mortality and the physical limitations of the human body.

3.3. Legal and Regulatory Frameworks

The most profound societal implication of WBE is the potential for a new form of societal stratification. This is not merely an economic divide but a fundamental schism in the human condition, with an immortal, elite class existing alongside the mortal population. The existing legal frameworks are completely unprepared for this reality. The current legal precedents for digital assets, for example, often draw a distinction between full ownership and a "right-to-use" license, and legal precedent has denied the bequest of licensed digital goods.25 This foundational issue would need to be addressed for WBE to be a viable form of legacy, inheritance, or immortality. The legal vacuum also extends to the very concept of digital personhood. The current debates over the rights of brain organoids, which are biological tissues cultivated in a lab, reveal the legal system's struggle.24 An uploaded mind would be a far more complex entity, and the lack of a legal framework for its rights and responsibilities would create immense instability. This societal stratification, enabled by technology and unaddressed by law, is the most profound and concerning implication of WBE.

Chapter 4: The Human Impact and Psychological Dimensions

4.1. The Psychology of Digital Grief: From "Echos" to "Ghosts"

The psychological impact of WBE can be understood by first examining the current state of digital legacy and its effect on the grieving process. A deceased person's digital footprint—social media profiles, photos, and messages—can be a source of profound comfort, allowing for communal mourning and the healthy process of maintaining a bond with the deceased.12 However, the persistence of this data also presents unique challenges. An unmanaged digital legacy can be a source of distress, and automated reminders on social media can unexpectedly trigger renewed grief, creating a state of "suspended grief" where the finality of death feels less absolute.7 An uploaded mind would transform this psychological dynamic from a passive "digital echo" to an active, sentient "digital ghost" with agency and the capacity for interaction. This would likely transform "suspended grief" into a state of "perpetual presence," where the living must navigate a relationship with a sentient, responsive version of the deceased. The psychological and emotional burden of this is completely unaddressed in current research and represents a critical, destabilizing factor. It would force families and friends to redefine their relationships with the dead, confronting questions of whether a continued relationship with a sentient digital entity is healthy or emotionally sustainable.

4.2. WBE and Human Relationships

The existence of WBE would also profoundly transform human relationships and intimacy. The existing market for AI-powered companionship and social robots shows a clear human desire for connection that can be fulfilled by non-human entities.33 Companies are actively rebranding these products to focus on companionship and emotional support, as exemplified by the Realbotix's Harmony AI, which is designed to be a "perfect companion" with customizable personalities and conversation.33 However, this raises a troubling question: if a perfectly tailored digital twin is available, what happens to the value of an imperfect human partner? Ethical analyses of AI companionship, particularly in the context of sex robots, have argued that interaction with a non-consenting, non-demanding entity could degrade our capacity for genuine human connection.30 They argue that this technology promotes antisocial behavior and fosters unrealistic expectations of what a human relationship should be.31 WBE would fulfill this desire for a perfectly tailored partner at the highest possible level, with a sentient, responsive mind. This could lead to a societal shift where the value of authentic, imperfect human connection is diminished in favor of a flawless digital substitute.

Conclusion: A Look Ahead

Whole-brain emulation is not a near-term reality, but a distant, speculative goal that rests on the successful resolution of immense technical, philosophical, and societal challenges. The optimistic timelines offered by futurists are challenged by the cautious, evidence-based projections of neuroscientists, who recognize that WBE is bottlenecked not by predictable computational trends but by fundamental, unresolved questions in biology and engineering. The prospect of WBE forces a profound reckoning with our understanding of identity and consciousness, as the technology directly confronts the enduring philosophical paradox of the Ship of Theseus and the Hard Problem of subjective experience. From a societal perspective, WBE would not be an equalizing force but a stratifying one. Its initial, astronomical cost would likely create a new form of class division, with a small, wealthy, and potentially immortal emulated class existing alongside the mortal population. The existing legal frameworks for digital legacy and personhood are already straining to cope with simpler digital technologies, suggesting they are completely unprepared for the complexities of a sentient, digital entity. Ultimately, the true potential and peril of WBE do not lie in the code itself, but in the values, ethics, and society we build around it. The journey toward WBE will force humanity to redefine what it means to be alive, what it means to be a person, and what it means to grieve. The true test of this technology will be whether we can create a future where digital intelligence is a force for enhancement and unity, rather than for division and existential fragmentation. 참고 자료 Beyond the Mind's Horizon: The Quest for Whole Brain Emulation | by Coded Conversations | Medium, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://medium.com/@codedconversations/beyond-the-minds-horizon-the-quest-for-whole-brain-emulation-ea3455cc2dc6 WBE (Whole Brain Emulation) | Envisioning Vocab, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://www.envisioning.io/vocab/wbe-whole-brain-emulation The Philosophy Behind Mind Uploading - Number Analytics, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/philosophy-behind-mind-uploading Ship of Theseus - Wikipedia, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_of_Theseus Whole Brain Emulation: A Roadmap - Future of Humanity Institute, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/brain-emulation-roadmap-report.pdf Law Professor: Let Bereaved Families Delete Data To Stop AI ..., 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://www.pcmag.com/news/law-professor-let-bereaved-families-delete-data-to-stop-ai-digital-resurrection How Does Digital Legacy Impact Family Dynamics? - Lifestyle → Sustainability Directory, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://lifestyle.sustainability-directory.com/question/how-does-digital-legacy-impact-family-dynamics/ Would an AI Emulation of Someone's Brain Be Conscious? — Would It Be an Upload of Their Mind? | by Rick Mammone | The Quantastic Journal | Medium, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://medium.com/the-quantastic-journal/would-an-ai-emulation-of-someones-brain-be-conscious-would-it-be-an-upload-of-their-mind-8cc9af50847f Digital Immortality Global Market Report 2025 - GII Research, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://www.giiresearch.com/report/tbrc1750968-digital-immortality-global-market-report.html Whole brain emulation by Murray Shanahan, Carlos Grande, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://carlosgrande.me/whole-brain-emulation/ (PDF) Ethics of Brain Emulations - ResearchGate, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263474325_Ethics_of_Brain_Emulations Psychology of Digital Legacy → Term, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://lifestyle.sustainability-directory.com/term/psychology-of-digital-legacy/ Comparative prospects of imaging methods for whole-brain mammalian connectomics Logan Thrasher Collins,1,* Todd Huffman, Randal - arXiv, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.10488 Mind uploading - Wikipedia, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_uploading Brain-Inspired Computing Can Help Us Create Faster, More Energy-Efficient Devices — If We Win the Race | NIST, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://www.nist.gov/blogs/taking-measure/brain-inspired-computing-can-help-us-create-faster-more-energy-efficient Brain simulation - Wikipedia, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_simulation Brave new world: the evolution of mind in the twenty-first century, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, http://www.ghandchi.com/iranscope/Anthology/Kurzweil-BNW.htm The Singularity Is Near - Wikipedia, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Singularity_Is_Near What are memories made of? A survey of neuroscientists on the structural basis of long-term memory | PLOS One - Research journals, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326920 Human Brain Project - Wikipedia, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Brain_Project Human Brain Project - Forschungszentrum Jülich, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://www.fz-juelich.de/en/research/research-fields/information/hbp Emulated Brain: Mind Uploading and Digital Consciousness - YouTube, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqdc_S3MnHw Ship of Theseus – Philosophical Thought - OPEN OKSTATE, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://open.library.okstate.edu/introphilosophy/chapter/ship-of-theseus/ The legal personhood of human brain organoids - PMC, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10070033/ Digital inheritance - Wikipedia, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_inheritance www.giiresearch.com, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://www.giiresearch.com/report/tbrc1750968-digital-immortality-global-market-report.html#:~:text=The%20digital%20immortality%20market%20size,(CAGR)%20of%2015.1%25. www.forbes.com, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://www.forbes.com/sites/virginieberger/2024/10/22/ai-is-changing-the-future-of-human-intimacy-heres-what-to-know/#:~:text=Meanwhile%2C%20several%20startups%20are%20developing,between%20physical%20and%20digital%20intimacy. SexTech Market Size, Share & 2030 Growth Trends Report, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/sextech-market Rebranding Sex Robots: Realbotix's Corporate Metamorphosis, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/197721/Masterson%20and%20Robert%20Accepted%20Realbotix_Ro_Man_Camera_Ready.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Sex robots increase the potential for gender-based violence | The Royal Society of Canada, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://rsc-src.ca/en/voices/sex-robots-increase-potential-for-gender-based-violence DRAFT: We Robot Conference 2012 Sinziana Gutiu 1 Sex Robots and Roboticization of Consent, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://robots.law.miami.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Gutiu-Roboticization_of_Consent.pdf The Harmful Effects of Sex Robots on Women and Society - Open Journal Systems, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://ojs.tchpc.tcd.ie/index.php/TrinityWomensReview/article/download/2049/594/5642 Tech Companies Developing AI Sex Robots - CBS Sacramento, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/tech-companies-developing-ai-sex-robots/ RealDolls sex robots are ready to talk you into bed - CNET, 8월 25, 2025에 액세스, https://www.cnet.com/culture/abyss-creations-ai-sex-robots-headed-to-your-bed-and-heart/