Deep Research Archives

The Social Synapse: A Scientific Deconstruction of First Impressions

Introduction

The formation of a first impression is a ubiquitous and fundamental aspect of human social interaction. Within moments of an initial encounter, a complex web of judgments is spun, creating a cognitive and affective framework that profoundly influences the subsequent course of the relationship. These initial assessments, often made unconsciously, shape our perceptions of others' character, intentions, and capabilities, with far-reaching consequences in personal, professional, and societal domains. The common adage, "You never get a second chance to make a first impression," speaks to the perceived power and permanence of these initial judgments.1 While intuitive, this folk wisdom is substantiated by a vast and growing body of scientific research that demystifies the process, revealing it to be not a superficial artifact of social grace, but a deeply ingrained, evolutionarily honed cognitive function. The purpose of this report is to provide an exhaustive, evidence-based analysis of the psychological and neuroscientific mechanisms that govern the formation of first impressions. This inquiry moves beyond prescriptive advice on social etiquette to deconstruct the intricate processes at play, from the millisecond-fast neural computations that occur upon seeing a new face to the complex cognitive biases that anchor these judgments and render them resistant to change. The central thesis of this analysis is that first impressions are a product of a dual-process system. They are initiated by a rapid, automatic, and affect-driven appraisal rooted in evolutionary survival imperatives—a "friend-or-foe" assessment—and are subsequently elaborated and defended by a slower, more deliberative cognitive architecture. This report will demonstrate that these impressions are formed with remarkable speed through the subconscious processing of a rich tapestry of non-verbal cues, are shaped by predictable cognitive shortcuts, and are underpinned by specific, identifiable neural circuits. Furthermore, it will explore the developmental trajectory of this ability from infancy to adulthood, its modulation by cultural and contextual factors, and the strategies individuals employ to manage the impressions they convey. While these impressions are powerful and persistent, they are also, to a degree, malleable, and understanding the science behind their formation and revision is critical for navigating the complexities of human perception with greater awareness and equity. By synthesizing research from social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and developmental psychology, this report aims to illuminate the social synapse—the critical moment of connection where one mind begins to form a representation of another.

The Automatic Appraisal: The Speed and Inevitability of First Impressions

The process of forming a first impression is not a deliberate, conscious act of evaluation but rather an automatic, nearly instantaneous appraisal. The human brain is hardwired to make rapid judgments about others based on minimal information, a capacity that is both a remarkable feat of social cognition and a source of significant bias. This section explores the foundational principles of this rapid assessment, focusing on the concept of "thin-slicing," the precise speed at which these judgments occur, and the evolutionary pressures that shaped this indispensable survival mechanism.

The "Thin Slice": Deconstructing Nalini Ambady's Research

The term "thin-slicing" refers to the ability of the unconscious mind to find patterns and make surprisingly accurate judgments about people or situations based on extremely brief excerpts of expressive behavior.4 Coined by psychologist Nalini Ambady and her colleague Robert Rosenthal, this concept challenges the conventional wisdom that more information and longer deliberation lead to more accurate assessments.6 Their research demonstrates that meaningful impressions can be formed from observations lasting less than five minutes, and in many cases, mere seconds.8 A foundational meta-analysis conducted by Ambady and Rosenthal in 1992 reviewed 38 studies and found a robust correlation between judgments made from thin slices of behavior and more objective outcomes, with an overall effect size (r) of.39.9 This analysis revealed that the accuracy of these judgments was not significantly related to the length of the observation; predictions based on clips under 30 seconds were just as accurate as those based on observations of four or five minutes.5 This finding suggests that the critical information for forming an initial impression is transmitted and processed very quickly. One of the most compelling demonstrations of this phenomenon comes from a 1993 study on teacher effectiveness. Ambady and Rosenthal presented participants with silent video clips of college teachers they had never met. The participants' ratings of the teachers' traits—such as competence, confidence, and warmth—based on clips as short as two, five, and ten seconds, significantly predicted the teachers' end-of-semester student evaluations.10 The correlation between the thin-slice judgments and the students' comprehensive evaluations was remarkably high ( r=.76), indicating that the snap judgments of strangers captured the same essential qualities that students perceived over an entire semester.7 The mechanism underlying thin-slicing appears to be a biological and unconscious process. Over one hundred studies across nonverbal communication, evolutionary psychology, and social cognition support the conclusion that these judgments are hardwired into the human brain.12 The process occurs outside of conscious awareness and requires little to no cognitive effort.12 This is evidenced by the fact that individuals are often unable to articulate the specific micro-cues—such as a fleeting smile, a subtle gesture, or a shift in posture—that informed their broader, macro-level judgment of a person's character.8 When prompted to analyze their reasoning, the accuracy of these intuitive judgments often decreases, suggesting that conscious deliberation can interfere with this finely tuned subconscious process.7

The Temporal Threshold: How Quickly the Brain Forms an Impression

While thin-slicing research established that impressions form within seconds, subsequent work in neuroscience has pinpointed the temporal threshold with even greater precision, revealing that the brain's initial assessment occurs in milliseconds. Research led by Princeton psychologist Alexander Todorov has shown that people make specific trait inferences from facial appearance after only a fraction of a second of exposure.12 In a series of timed experiments, Todorov and colleagues found that judgments of key social traits like trustworthiness, competence, and attractiveness are made within 100 milliseconds (one-tenth of a second).15 Further studies have pushed this boundary even lower, suggesting that the brain begins to differentiate between trustworthy and untrustworthy faces after as little as 33 milliseconds of exposure, a duration so brief that it often falls below the threshold of conscious awareness.17 A critical finding from this research is the distinction between the formation of the judgment itself and the confidence in that judgment. When exposure time was increased from 100 milliseconds to 500 or 1,000 milliseconds, the content of the participants' judgments did not significantly change. An individual deemed untrustworthy at 100 milliseconds was still deemed untrustworthy at one second. What did change was the participants' self-reported confidence in their assessment.15 This indicates that the initial snap judgment acts as a powerful cognitive anchor. The brain makes an immediate evaluation, and any additional time is used not to revise this initial take but to gather confirmatory evidence that strengthens one's belief in its accuracy. This process highlights the brain's remarkable efficiency in creating a preliminary social roadmap, even if that map is based on incomplete or potentially misleading information.

Evolutionary Roots: The "Friend-or-Foe" Imperative

The incredible speed and automaticity of first impressions are not arbitrary features of the human mind; they are the products of immense evolutionary pressure. This capacity is widely believed to be an evolved trait that was essential for navigating the complex social world of our ancestors and, ultimately, for survival.12 The primary challenge in any encounter with an unknown individual was to quickly and efficiently answer two fundamental questions: What are this person's intentions (are they a friend or a foe)? And what is their capacity to act on those intentions (are they a threat or an opportunity)?.16 This "friend-or-foe" imperative shaped a neural system optimized for rapid social valuation. The brain regions involved in this process, such as the amygdala, are deeply rooted in our evolutionary history and are specialized for detecting threats and rewards in the environment.21 When we meet someone new, these ancient circuits are activated, performing a swift calculation of the person's potential value or danger to us.21 This assessment is not a detached analysis of personality but a deeply subjective evaluation of another's importance relative to our own motivations and goals.21 This evolutionary framework explains why trustworthiness and dominance emerge as the two primary dimensions of face evaluation in modern psychological research.19 Trustworthiness serves as a proxy for judging intentions (friend or foe), while dominance serves as a proxy for judging capability (ability to help or harm). The brain's immediate response to a new face is, in essence, a modern echo of an ancient survival calculation. The extreme speed of first impressions is a direct consequence of an evolutionary trade-off between efficiency and comprehensive accuracy. The cognitive systems responsible for these snap judgments were not sculpted by natural selection to produce a perfectly detailed and infallible character profile of a stranger. Such a process would be slow, deliberate, and cognitively expensive—a dangerous luxury in an environment where threats could be immediate. Instead, the brain evolved a system that relies on heuristics, or mental shortcuts, to generate a "good enough" assessment that serves the immediate and critical goal of social navigation and threat detection. This system is highly efficient, processing a cascade of non-verbal cues in milliseconds to produce an approach/avoid signal. The "surprising accuracy" observed in thin-slicing studies 5 is likely a testament to this system's effectiveness in capturing cues relevant to immediate social intent, such as warmth and competence, which are critical for predicting short-term behavior. However, this optimization for speed comes at the cost of depth and nuance, rendering the system highly susceptible to the biases and stereotypes that will be explored in subsequent sections. The first impression, therefore, is not an attempt at a complete psychological portrait but rather a rapid, probabilistic bet on another person's immediate social value.

The Anatomy of a Judgment: Decoding Non-Verbal and Physical Cues

The brain's rapid appraisal of another individual is fueled by a rich stream of non-verbal and physical information. While words can be carefully chosen and controlled, these cues are often emitted unconsciously, providing what is perceived as a more authentic window into a person's character and intentions. This section deconstructs the key channels of non-verbal communication, from the intricate signals of the human face to the broader messages conveyed by posture, voice, and attire, and organizes them into a comprehensive taxonomy.

The Face as a Social Canvas: Todorov's Dimensional Model

The face is arguably the most important source of social information, and our brains are exquisitely tuned to its nuances.14 From the moment of birth, infants show a preference for face-like objects over other complex stimuli.14 Research by psychologist Alexander Todorov and his colleagues has provided a powerful framework for understanding how we evaluate faces. Their work suggests that despite the myriad of traits we might attribute to someone, our judgments are fundamentally organized along two primary, independent dimensions: Valence/Trustworthiness and Power/Dominance.19 Trustworthiness judgments, which signal whether another's intentions are good or bad, are strongly linked to facial features that resemble emotional expressions. This is known as the emotion overgeneralization hypothesis. Faces with features that mimic a happy expression—such as upturned corners of the mouth and raised inner eyebrows—are consistently perceived as more trustworthy. Conversely, faces with features resembling an angry expression—such as downturned corners of the mouth and lowered eyebrows—are perceived as untrustworthy.24 Even eye color can play a role, with studies showing a preference for brown eyes, likely because they are statistically associated with other facial features, like a rounder chin and bigger mouth, that align with the trustworthy archetype.27 Dominance judgments, which signal a person's ability to enact their intentions (to help or harm), are linked to physical cues of strength, health, and maturity. Features such as a wider facial structure, a more prominent chin, and other markers of masculinity are typically associated with higher ratings of dominance.24 Competence is often viewed as a secondary judgment derived from a combination of high trustworthiness and high dominance.29 These findings suggest that our brains use a simple, efficient heuristic: we evaluate faces by overgeneralizing cues that, in other contexts, reliably signal emotion and physical strength.

The Body Politic: Posture, Gesture, and Proxemics

Beyond the face, the entire body serves as a canvas for communication. Body language accounts for a significant portion of how we are perceived, with some estimates suggesting it constitutes 55% of communication in an initial encounter.30 Posture is a primary indicator of confidence and attitude. An upright, tall stance with shoulders back and head held high signals confidence, competence, and openness to engagement.31 In contrast, slouching, crossed arms, or a hunched-over posture can be interpreted as signs of disinterest, insecurity, defensiveness, or unfriendliness.32 Gestures add a layer of dynamism and emphasis to communication. The use of natural, open-handed gestures while speaking can make a person appear more agreeable, engaging, and likable.31 Conversely, fidgeting, rapidly tapping fingers, or clasping hands behind the back can signal boredom, impatience, anxiety, or even anger.34 Proxemics, or the use of personal space, is another powerful non-verbal cue that is highly dependent on cultural norms.35 The physical distance one maintains from another person can signal the level of intimacy, comfort, and social status within the relationship. In Western cultures, for example, there are generally four zones: intimate distance (for close relationships), personal distance (for friends and family), social distance (for acquaintances), and public distance (for public speaking).34 Violating these unspoken spatial rules can create immediate discomfort and a negative impression.

The Auditory Signature: Vocal Cues

The sound of a person's voice provides a rich source of information that shapes first impressions, with some research suggesting it accounts for as much as 38% of the impression formed in a face-to-face interaction.30 Key vocal cues include tone, pitch, pace, and clarity. A voice that is clear, articulate, and varied in pitch is often perceived as more confident and intelligent.33 Speaking slowly and calmly can also project an image of greater confidence and control.36 The voice is often considered a particularly "leaky" channel of communication, meaning it can reveal true emotions and intentions that a person might be trying to conceal through their words or facial expressions.7 A striking example of this comes from a study conducted by Nalini Ambady on surgeons' past malpractice claims. By having participants listen to just two 10-second audio clips of a surgeon's voice—with the verbal content filtered out so that only the tone, pitch, and rhythm remained—researchers were able to predict with significant accuracy which surgeons had been sued for malpractice in the past. Surgeons whose vocal tones were rated as more dominant and unfeeling were more likely to have a history of being sued, highlighting how powerfully our vocal delivery communicates underlying attitudes like warmth and empathy.7

Enclothed Cognition: Appearance, Clothing, and Grooming

Appearance, encompassing both clothing and personal grooming, is a potent and immediate signal of a person's identity, social status, and professionalism. Whether consciously or not, we use attire to make rapid inferences about a person's character, competence, and reliability.37 In professional contexts, appropriate and well-maintained clothing is strongly associated with perceptions of competence, authority, and trustworthiness.38 One study found that even subtle differences in tailoring can have a significant impact. When participants were shown faceless images of a man in a bespoke (custom-tailored) suit versus an off-the-peg (ready-made) suit for just five seconds, they rated the man in the bespoke suit as more confident, successful, trustworthy, and flexible.41 This demonstrates that the brain is attuned to fine details that signal investment and attention to detail, which are then generalized to the wearer's character. The context of the interaction is paramount. A formal suit that signals competence in a job interview might appear out of place and create a negative impression at a casual social gathering.40 Similarly, colors can evoke specific psychological associations; for example, blue is often linked with trustworthiness, while red can signify power and passion.43 Ultimately, good grooming and clothing that is clean, well-fitted, and appropriate for the occasion signal respect for oneself and for the situation, contributing powerfully to a positive first impression.38

Table 1: A Taxonomy of Non-Verbal Cues in First Impressions

To consolidate the various channels of non-verbal communication, the following table provides a structured overview of key cues and their common psychological interpretations in Western cultural contexts.

Cue Category Positive Signal (and Common Interpretation) Negative Signal (and Common Interpretation) Facial Expressions Genuine (Duchenne) smile, slightly raised eyebrows 31 Frown, pursed lips, scowl 33

Interpretation: Warmth, friendliness, trustworthiness, confidence Interpretation: Disapproval, distrust, anger, unhappiness Eye Contact Direct but not prolonged gaze, natural blinking 30 Averting gaze, looking down, rapid blinking, staring 30

Interpretation: Confidence, interest, honesty, engagement Interpretation: Dishonesty, discomfort, anxiety, aggression Posture Standing/sitting tall, shoulders back, open stance 30 Slouching, hunching forward, closed stance (arms/legs crossed) 32

Interpretation: Confidence, competence, openness, attentiveness Interpretation: Defensiveness, disinterest, insecurity, anxiety Gestures Natural, open-handed movements, mirroring, nodding 30 Fidgeting, finger-tapping, clenched fists, pointing 34

Interpretation: Engagement, enthusiasm, rapport, agreement Interpretation: Boredom, impatience, anger, aggression Vocal Cues Clear and articulate speech, varied pitch, calm pace 33 Mumbling, monotonous tone, speaking too fast or too slow 33

Interpretation: Confidence, intelligence, authority, composure Interpretation: Insecurity, disinterest, anxiety, lack of credibility Appearance Clean, well-fitted, context-appropriate clothing; good grooming 38 Wrinkled, ill-fitting, or inappropriate attire; poor grooming 38

Interpretation: Professionalism, competence, reliability, attention to detail Interpretation: Laziness, disorganization, lack of respect, incompetence

The Mind's Shortcuts: Cognitive Biases in Social Perception

The formation of first impressions is not a purely objective process of data collection and analysis. Instead, it is heavily influenced by a series of cognitive biases—systematic patterns of deviation from norm or rationality in judgment. These mental shortcuts, or heuristics, allow the brain to make rapid assessments with minimal cognitive effort. While efficient, they often lead to predictable errors and distortions, creating impressions that are not only inaccurate but also remarkably resistant to change. This section examines the key cognitive biases that shape and entrench our initial perceptions of others.

The Halo Effect: The Cascade of Positive Assumptions

The Halo Effect is one of the most powerful biases in social perception. It describes the tendency for an initial positive impression of a person in one area to positively influence one's opinion of that person in other, unrelated areas.46 In essence, a single positive trait casts a "halo" that illuminates the entire individual, leading to a global positive assessment.46 For example, a person perceived as physically attractive is often unconsciously assumed to also be more intelligent, competent, kind, and trustworthy, a phenomenon sometimes referred to as the "what is beautiful is good" stereotype.51 This bias has profound and tangible consequences across various domains. In educational settings, teachers may unconsciously hold higher expectations for students they find more attractive, which can become a self-fulfilling prophecy.51 In the workplace, the halo effect can influence hiring decisions and performance appraisals, where a single positive attribute, such as confidence or a polished appearance, may overshadow a lack of skill or experience.51 Marketers also leverage this bias by using attractive celebrity spokespeople, knowing that consumers' positive feelings toward the celebrity will likely transfer to the product being endorsed.51 The inverse of this phenomenon is the "Horn Effect," where a single negative trait casts a "horn" that leads to an overall negative evaluation.47 For instance, if a person is perceived as unattractive, they may also be unfairly judged as less intelligent or less friendly. Both the Halo and Horn effects demonstrate the brain's preference for cognitive consistency, simplifying the complex task of person perception into a simple, coherent, and often biased, narrative.

The Primacy Effect: The Enduring Power of "First"

The Primacy Effect is a cognitive bias wherein information presented early in a sequence is given more weight and is more easily recalled than information presented later.3 In the context of impression formation, this means that the very first pieces of information we learn about someone—whether it's their appearance, their handshake, or their opening words—have a disproportionate impact on our overall judgment. Pioneering research by social psychologist Solomon Asch demonstrated this effect clearly. When participants were given a list of traits describing a person, their overall impression was significantly more positive if the list began with positive traits (e.g., "intelligent, industrious, impulsive, critical, stubborn, envious") than if the same list was presented in reverse order.54 The initial positive traits created a cognitive framework, or schema, through which all subsequent, more negative traits were interpreted. "Stubborn," for example, might be interpreted as "principled" in the context of an intelligent person, but as "pig-headed" in the context of an envious one. This anchoring effect explains why first impressions are so "sticky" and difficult to dislodge; the initial judgment creates a lens that colors all future perceptions.1

The Reinforcement Loop: Confirmation Bias

Once an initial impression is formed—often through the combined influence of the Primacy and Halo effects—it is actively defended by another powerful cognitive bias: Confirmation Bias. This is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information that confirms or supports one's preexisting beliefs, while simultaneously ignoring, devaluing, or forgetting contradictory evidence.52 Confirmation bias creates a self-reinforcing loop that solidifies first impressions. If our initial assessment of someone is positive, we will subconsciously pay more attention to their positive behaviors and successes, interpreting ambiguous actions in a favorable light. We might dismiss their mistakes as uncharacteristic or caused by external factors. Conversely, if our first impression is negative, we will be more attuned to their flaws and failures, seeing them as proof of their poor character.52 This selective attention and interpretation makes it very difficult for a person to overcome a bad first impression, as the observer is cognitively predisposed to see what they already expect to see. The observer is not a passive recipient of new information but an active, albeit often unconscious, participant in reinforcing their initial judgment. The persistence of first impressions is therefore not merely a psychological quirk but the predictable outcome of a three-stage cognitive process. This sequence begins with the first pieces of information an observer receives, which are given disproportionate weight due to the Primacy Effect, establishing an initial cognitive anchor. If one of these initial cues is particularly salient and positive (such as physical attractiveness) or negative (such as a rude comment), it can trigger a global evaluation through the Halo Effect or Horn Effect, generalizing that single trait to the person's entire character. Once this global judgment is formed—"this is a good person" or "this is an incompetent person"—the brain's default mechanism is to maintain cognitive consistency and avoid the effortful process of re-evaluation. Confirmation Bias serves precisely this function, acting as a cognitive gatekeeper that filters all subsequent information. It actively seeks out and prioritizes evidence that supports the initial assessment while dismissing or reinterpreting contradictory data. This creates a powerful, self-reinforcing cognitive loop. Consequently, the well-documented difficulty in changing a first impression 2 is not just a function of the strength of the initial judgment but is an active process of cognitive defense. To overcome this impression requires a conscious and deliberate effort to override this entire automatic sequence, a task that is cognitively demanding. This explains why consistent, repeated exposure to contradictory behavior over time is the most effective strategy for repairing a bad first impression, as it provides an overwhelming volume of new data that can eventually force the cognitive system to expend the energy required for a fundamental re-evaluation.

The Neural Architecture of Social Judgment

The rapid and biased formation of first impressions is not a purely abstract psychological phenomenon; it is rooted in the concrete structure and function of the human brain. Advances in cognitive neuroscience, particularly through techniques like functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), have begun to map the neural circuits that underpin social judgment. This research reveals a sophisticated interplay between ancient, emotion-processing regions and more recently evolved cortical areas responsible for higher-order cognition.

The Amygdala: The Brain's Early Warning System

Deep within the brain's temporal lobes lies the amygdala, a pair of almond-shaped structures that are a core component of the limbic system.59 The amygdala is critical for processing emotions, learning from fear, and making rapid, automatic evaluations of stimuli in the environment.21 It is uniquely positioned to receive information from all of the senses, allowing it to act as a central hub for assessing the potential significance of incoming information.21 In the context of first impressions, the amygdala functions as an early warning system, providing the neural basis for the swift "friend-or-foe" judgment. Neuroimaging studies consistently show that the amygdala is involved in the evaluation of facial trustworthiness, even when this evaluation is implicit and occurs below the threshold of conscious awareness.15 The response in the amygdala often shows a negative linear relationship with perceived trustworthiness: as a face appears more untrustworthy, the amygdala's activity increases.25 This is consistent with its broader role in threat detection. Interestingly, some research also shows a quadratic response, with the amygdala responding strongly to faces at both the highly trustworthy and highly untrustworthy ends of the spectrum, suggesting it is attuned to any face that is motivationally salient, whether as a potential threat or a valuable ally.26 This rapid, amygdala-driven assessment provides the initial affective "tag" or "gut feeling" that forms the foundation of a first impression.

The Medial Prefrontal Cortex (mPFC): The Hub for Social Cognition

While the amygdala provides the initial, raw emotional assessment, the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), located in the frontal lobe, serves as the brain's primary hub for more complex social cognition.61 The mPFC is consistently activated when individuals are asked to form impressions of others, particularly when those impressions are based on behavioral information.63 This brain region is crucial for "mentalizing" or "theory of mind"—the ability to represent and reason about the mental states, beliefs, and intentions of others.61 Research suggests that the mPFC is not a monolithic structure but contains subregions with specialized functions in social evaluation. The dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) is often associated with the initial formation of impressions based on specific behaviors.63 The ventral mPFC (vmPFC), with its strong connections to the limbic system, appears to be more involved in processing the value and warmth associated with a person.64 Another region, the anterior mid-cingulate cortex (aMCC), seems to play a critical role in conflict monitoring. It becomes particularly active when we observe behavior that is inconsistent with our initial impression, suggesting it is involved in detecting and attempting to resolve the discrepancy between our expectations and reality.64

The Dynamics of Revision: The mPFC and Impression Updating

First impressions are not always static. When we encounter new information that contradicts our initial assessment, the brain must engage in a process of "impression updating." This cognitively demanding task relies heavily on the mPFC and its associated networks. While the dmPFC is active during initial impression formation, a broader network—including the rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (rlPFC), superior temporal sulcus (STS), and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC)—is recruited when an impression needs to be revised in light of evaluatively inconsistent information.63 The causal role of the mPFC in this process has been demonstrated using non-invasive brain stimulation. Studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to temporarily disrupt activity in the mPFC have found that this interference specifically impairs the ability to update impressions based on conflicting information, while leaving initial impression formation intact.66 This provides strong evidence that the mPFC is not just correlated with but is causally necessary for the flexible revision of our social judgments. This updating process often involves a "top-down" regulation of the amygdala by the mPFC. The initial, rapid emotional signal from the amygdala is relayed to the mPFC, which integrates this affective information with contextual cues, prior knowledge, and goals. The mPFC can then modulate the amygdala's activity, either amplifying or dampening the initial emotional response to form a more nuanced and context-appropriate social judgment.68 This dynamic interplay between the mPFC and the amygdala is fundamental to resolving emotional conflict and adapting our social perceptions over time. The collective neural evidence strongly supports a dual-process model for the formation and maintenance of social judgments. This model posits two distinct but interacting systems. The first, a rapid and automatic System 1, is mediated primarily by the amygdala and other subcortical structures. This system operates quickly, unconsciously, and is driven by affect, generating the initial "gut feeling" or valence tag (e.g., trustworthy/untrustworthy, friend/foe) that constitutes the core of a snap judgment. Its function is rooted in evolutionary survival mechanisms, providing an immediate assessment of potential threat or reward. The second, a slower and more controlled System 2, is mediated by the medial prefrontal cortex and its extensive network of connections to other cortical regions. This system is engaged when there is a need for more deliberate, cognitively demanding processing, such as when integrating complex behavioral information, resolving inconsistencies between an expectation and a new reality, or consciously updating an established impression. The anatomical and functional pathways connecting the mPFC and the amygdala provide the physical substrate for the interaction between these two systems.68 The mPFC can exert top-down control, modulating the initial, raw output of the amygdala. This neural architecture elegantly explains the full lifecycle of a first impression. The powerful, immediate snap judgment is a product of the efficient, heuristic-based System 1. The more difficult, conscious, and less frequent process of changing one's mind about someone is a function of the effortful, rule-based System 2. The well-documented "stickiness" of first impressions can thus be understood neurobiologically: it reflects the inherent cognitive effort required to engage the prefrontal machinery of System 2 to override the default, automatic, and emotionally potent output of System 1.

The Developing Social Brain: A Lifespan Perspective

The sophisticated capacity to form impressions of others is not fully formed at birth but develops progressively throughout infancy, childhood, and adolescence. This developmental trajectory is closely linked to the maturation of the brain's social cognition networks. Early in life, infants demonstrate foundational abilities to perceive and react to social cues, which are gradually refined into the complex, trait-based inferential systems used by adults.

Innate Predispositions: Infant Sensitivity to Faces

The building blocks of impression formation are present from a very early age. Research shows that infants, as young as 6 to 8 months old, exhibit a preference for looking at faces that adults have rated as trustworthy over faces rated as untrustworthy.70 This suggests an early sensitivity to the facial cues that underlie adult social judgments. However, this preference is likely not based on an abstract understanding of "trustworthiness" as a character trait. Instead, it is more probably rooted in a more fundamental sensitivity to emotional expressions. As established by Todorov and others, faces perceived as trustworthy by adults share many structural features with happy expressions (e.g., upturned mouth), while untrustworthy faces share features with angry expressions (e.g., downturned eyebrows).25 Given that even newborns can discriminate between some facial expressions, such as happiness and fear 73, the infant preference for "trustworthy" faces may be an extension of an innate or very early-learned preference for positive affect.74 This early bias provides a crucial foundation, predisposing the infant to orient toward individuals who display signals of positive intent. Neuroimaging studies with infants support this view, showing that the infant's medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is actively involved in this process. The mPFC's response can distinguish between smiling and frowning faces directed at the infant, and the strength of this neural response predicts the infant's subsequent looking preferences, indicating that the neural architecture for social evaluation begins to function very early in life.75

Learning to "Read" Others: The Role of Social Referencing

While infants possess an initial sensitivity to facial cues, they learn to attach specific meanings to ambiguous situations and people through a powerful learning mechanism known as social referencing. This is the process wherein infants and young children look to the emotional expressions of a trusted caregiver to interpret an uncertain situation and guide their own behavior.76 The classic "visual cliff" experiment provides a compelling demonstration of this phenomenon. An infant placed on a solid surface that appears to have a sharp drop-off will look to their caregiver's face. If the caregiver displays a fearful or anxious expression, the infant will typically refuse to cross the "cliff." However, if the caregiver shows a smiling and encouraging expression, the infant is much more likely to cross.76 This process is not limited to physical environments; it also applies to social encounters. An infant's reaction to a stranger is heavily influenced by the caregiver's vocal tone and facial expression when greeting that stranger.78 Social referencing is a cornerstone of early social-emotional development. It allows children to learn about the world vicariously, leveraging the knowledge and emotional appraisals of others to build their own map of what is safe, what is dangerous, who is friendly, and who is not. This process is fundamental to impression formation, as it teaches the child to link specific people and contexts with specific emotional valences, forming the associative basis for later, more abstract trait judgments.79

Childhood and Adolescence: Refining Trait Inference

As children's cognitive abilities mature, their method of evaluating others undergoes a significant transformation. They move from reacting primarily to transient affective cues to making inferences about stable, internal dispositions, or traits. This shift becomes evident around the age of 3 or 4. At this stage, children begin to make trait attributions to faces that show remarkable consistency with those made by adults. When shown pairs of faces, they reliably identify which one looks "nice" versus "mean" (trustworthiness), "strong" versus "not strong" (dominance), and "smart" versus "not smart" (competence).80 The consensus on these judgments strengthens with age, and by ages 5 to 6, children's consistency on some traits, particularly trustworthiness, reaches adult levels.80 However, the ability to use these facial trait inferences to predict or interpret behavior develops more gradually. While 4-year-olds can infer traits from faces, it is not until around age 5 that they begin to consistently use this information to guide their own social behaviors, such as being more likely to share a toy with a person who has a trustworthy-looking face.83 Similarly, the ability to use facial cues to interpret ambiguous intentions (e.g., deciding if a misbehavior was accidental or on purpose) appears to emerge around age 6.84 Adolescence marks another critical period of development in social cognition, driven by the ongoing maturation of the prefrontal cortex and a heightened orientation toward the peer group.85 During this time, individuals become more sophisticated in their understanding of social dynamics, personality, and the nuances of impression management. They experiment with different identities and become more adept at perceiving and interpreting the complex mental states of others, a process that is central to forming adult-like social relationships.54 The developmental path of impression formation follows a clear and logical progression from a concrete, affect-based system to a more abstract, trait-based one. This journey begins in infancy with a fundamental, likely innate, sensitivity to the emotional valence of facial expressions—a simple discrimination between positive (approachable) and negative (threatening) cues.73 This is the foundational layer of social perception. The next critical step is facilitated by social referencing, where the infant learns to use a caregiver's emotional signals not merely as standalone affective information but as a guide to interpreting a third object, person, or situation.76 This process forges the crucial link between external referents and emotional meaning. Finally, during early childhood, a significant cognitive leap occurs. The child begins to abstract these learned associations into stable, internal dispositions or "traits." They move from reacting to a transient state ("that person is smiling at me") to inferring a permanent quality ("that person is nice").80 This developmental pathway mirrors the dual-process neural model. The infant's initial, affect-driven reaction is likely mediated by the fast-acting amygdala. The subsequent development of abstract trait inference and the ability to use those traits to predict behavior requires the maturation of higher-order cognitive functions supported by the prefrontal cortex. This progression illustrates how a basic biological sensitivity is progressively sculpted by social learning into the sophisticated cognitive skill of person perception.

The Social Stage: Contextual and Cultural Dynamics

The formation of first impressions, while rooted in universal biological and cognitive mechanisms, is not a monolithic process. The meaning and weight assigned to various cues are profoundly shaped by the context of the interaction and the cultural background of the perceiver. A behavior or attribute that creates a positive impression in one setting can be interpreted negatively in another. This section explores how situational demands and cultural frameworks moderate the process of social judgment, adding a critical layer of complexity to our understanding of first impressions.

Situational Context: The Rules of the Game

The setting of an initial encounter establishes a set of explicit and implicit expectations that guide how individuals present themselves and interpret the behavior of others. The cues that are prioritized in a professional job interview, for example, are substantially different from those that are salient in a casual social meeting or a virtual conference call.36 In a professional setting like a job interview, cues related to competence, professionalism, and reliability are paramount.89 An applicant's attire is expected to be formal and polished, their posture confident, their handshake firm, and their communication style articulate and focused.36 The goal of impression management is to project an image of a capable and diligent potential employee. Interviewers, in turn, are attuned to these cues, using them to make rapid judgments about an applicant's suitability for the role.89 In a casual social setting, such as a first date or a party, the emphasis shifts from competence to warmth, approachability, and compatibility.42 Here, overly formal attire or a rigid posture might be perceived as standoffish or awkward. Instead, open body language, genuine smiles, and the ability to engage in light, reciprocal conversation (small talk) are prioritized.92 The goal is to signal friendliness and create a sense of connection. The rise of virtual interactions has introduced a new context with its own unique set of rules. In a video meeting on a platform like Zoom, technical and environmental factors become critical components of a first impression.94 Cues such as lighting quality, camera angle, and the appropriateness of one's virtual or physical background are immediately processed and contribute to judgments of professionalism and preparedness.96 The quality of the audio-visual connection itself can impact perceptions; poor quality can lead to less accurate and less positive impressions, potentially disadvantaging individuals with less access to high-speed internet.95 Furthermore, the limited field of view in a video call means that facial expressions and upper-body gestures become even more significant channels for conveying engagement and confidence.97

Cultural Frameworks: The Lens of Interpretation

Culture provides the overarching framework through which all social cues are interpreted. Beliefs, values, and norms internalized from one's cultural group shape the schemata used to perceive and make sense of the world and the people within it.98 Consequently, a non-verbal cue that is positive in one culture may be neutral or even offensive in another, leading to significant potential for misunderstanding in cross-cultural first encounters. Eye contact is a classic example. In many Western cultures, direct and sustained eye contact is interpreted as a sign of honesty, confidence, and interest.35 However, in many East Asian, African, and Latin American cultures, prolonged eye contact, particularly with an elder or a person of higher status, can be seen as disrespectful or aggressive.35 Avoiding eye contact in these contexts is a sign of deference and respect, not dishonesty.100 Gestures are also highly culture-specific. The "thumbs-up" gesture, a sign of approval in North America, is considered a rude and offensive insult in parts of the Middle East and Greece.99 Similarly, the "A-OK" sign is offensive in Brazil and Turkey.99 Even a seemingly simple act like pointing is subject to cultural variation: using the index finger is common in the United States, while in many Asian countries, it is considered rude, and pointing with an open hand is preferred.35 Physical touch and personal space (proxemics) are also deeply informed by cultural norms. Cultures can be broadly categorized as "high-contact" (e.g., Latin America, Southern Europe, Middle East), where frequent touching and close proximity during conversation are common, and "low-contact" (e.g., East Asia, Northern Europe), where personal space is larger and touching is less frequent.35 A person from a high-contact culture might perceive someone from a low-contact culture as cold or unfriendly, while the latter might perceive the former as invasive or aggressive.

Individualism vs. Collectivism: Shaping Trait Perception

One of the most influential dimensions for understanding cultural variation is the spectrum of individualism versus collectivism.101 Individualistic cultures (predominantly found in North America and Western Europe) emphasize personal independence, uniqueness, and the pursuit of individual goals. In these cultures, the self is seen as an autonomous entity, and traits like assertiveness and self-expression are highly valued. Collectivistic cultures (prevalent in many parts of Asia, Africa, and Latin America) emphasize group harmony, interdependence, and the fulfillment of social roles and obligations. The self is defined in relation to the group, and traits like modesty, cooperation, and respect for authority are prioritized. This fundamental cultural difference influences how personality traits are perceived and expressed. From a trait perspective, the "Big Five" personality traits (Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism) appear to be largely universal in their structure.102 However, cultural psychology argues that the expression and importance of these traits are context-dependent.103 For example, behavior in collectivistic cultures may be more strongly guided by situational norms and role expectations than by internal personality traits, leading to greater behavioral variability across different social contexts.103 An individual might be reserved and deferential with their family but assertive and outgoing with close friends. This is not seen as inconsistency but as appropriate adaptation to social roles. In contrast, in individualistic cultures, there is a stronger expectation for cross-situational consistency in behavior as an expression of an "authentic" self.104 These differing expectations mean that the same behavior—such as speaking up to challenge a superior—could be interpreted as confident and competent in an individualistic context but as disrespectful and disruptive in a collectivistic one.

Impression Management: The Art and Science of Self-Presentation

While many of the processes involved in forming first impressions are automatic and unconscious on the part of the perceiver, the person being perceived is often an active, strategic participant in the interaction. Impression management is the conscious or unconscious process through which individuals attempt to influence the perceptions that other people form of them.105 This involves carefully regulating and controlling information in social interaction to present a desired image of oneself. This section explores the theoretical framework for understanding this process and details the specific strategies people employ in both face-to-face and digital environments.

The Dramaturgical Metaphor: Goffman's Front Stage and Back Stage

Sociologist Erving Goffman, in his seminal 1956 work The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, provided a powerful framework for understanding impression management known as dramaturgical analysis.107 Goffman used the metaphor of a theatrical performance to describe social interaction. In this view, individuals are "actors" on a social stage, performing specific "roles" for an "audience" with the goal of presenting a particular image of themselves.109 Goffman distinguished between two key regions of this performance: the "front stage" and the "back stage".108 The front stage is where the performance takes place. It is any setting where an individual knows they are being watched by others and acts in accordance with the social norms and expectations of that situation.112 On the front stage, individuals engage in impression management, carefully curating their appearance (costume), manner (demeanor), and setting (props) to project a desired image and maintain a coherent performance.108 A job applicant in an interview, a server in a restaurant, or a student in a classroom are all performing on the front stage. The back stage is a private region where the actor can relax, drop the performance, and step out of character.111 It is where individuals can be their more "authentic" selves, free from the scrutiny of the audience. The backstage is also where actors prepare for their front stage performances—rehearsing what they will say, adjusting their appearance, and preparing mentally for the role they are about to play.112 A crucial aspect of successful social interaction, according to Goffman, is maintaining a strict separation between these two regions. When the backstage is inadvertently revealed to the audience—a phenomenon Goffman called "performance disruption"—it can lead to embarrassment and a breakdown of the social reality the actors were trying to create.112

A Taxonomy of Impression Management Strategies

Within the dramaturgical framework, individuals employ a variety of specific tactics to shape others' perceptions. These strategies can be broadly categorized based on the desired outcome, such as being seen as likable, competent, or powerful. Key strategies include: Ingratiation: This strategy involves behaviors aimed at making oneself more likable to others to gain their approval.114 Common ingratiation tactics include flattery, expressing agreement with the other person's opinions, doing favors, and showing interest in them. While it can be a genuine way to build rapport, it can also be perceived as manipulative if it appears insincere.105 Self-Promotion: This strategy focuses on highlighting one's accomplishments, skills, and abilities to be perceived as competent.114 Self-promotion is common in professional settings like job interviews, where the goal is to convince the audience of one's qualifications. The key challenge with self-promotion is to convey competence without appearing arrogant or boastful.105 Exemplification: This involves attempting to project an image of integrity and moral worthiness. Individuals using this strategy go out of their way to appear dedicated, hardworking, and virtuous, hoping to be seen as a role model.114 This tactic can be effective but risks backfiring if the projected image is perceived as inauthentic or "too good to be true".117 Intimidation: This strategy aims to create an impression of power and dangerousness to elicit fear and obedience from others. It involves the use of threats, aggressive body language, and a commanding tone.105 While effective for asserting dominance, it is generally a high-risk strategy that can damage relationships and create hostility. Supplication: This is the opposite of intimidation and involves appearing helpless or in need to elicit sympathy and assistance from others.114 By highlighting their weaknesses, individuals using supplication hope to leverage social norms of helping those in need.

Impression Management in the Digital Age

The rise of social media and virtual communication has created new and complex "stages" for impression management. Digital platforms offer unprecedented control over self-presentation, allowing individuals to carefully curate their front stage performance for a potentially vast and diverse audience. On social media platforms like LinkedIn, Instagram, and Facebook, the user profile serves as a persistent digital front stage.120 Every element—the profile picture, the bio, the cover image, and the content shared—is a deliberate act of impression management designed to construct a particular identity.120 A professional headshot and a bio listing accomplishments on LinkedIn are forms of self-promotion.124 A curated Instagram feed showing travel and social events is a form of self-presentation aimed at conveying a desirable lifestyle.123 The goal is often to create a cohesive and positive online brand.125 However, the persistence and searchability of digital content introduce new challenges. A post from years ago can be resurfaced, potentially creating a conflict between a past self and the current desired impression.126 This has led to the practice of "retrospective impression management," where individuals curate or delete past content to align their digital history with their current self-presentational goals.126 Virtual meetings on platforms like Zoom have become a primary front stage for professional interactions.94 In this context, impression management extends beyond personal appearance to include technical and environmental factors. A clear, high-quality video and audio setup, appropriate lighting, and a non-distracting background are now crucial cues that signal professionalism and competence.96 Even subtle behaviors, such as looking directly at the camera to simulate eye contact and using the mute button appropriately, are important impression management tactics in the virtual environment.96

Beyond the First Encounter: The Malleability and Persistence of Impressions

While first impressions are formed with remarkable speed and are fortified by powerful cognitive biases, they are not necessarily immutable. Social perception is a dynamic and ongoing process. Although initial judgments create a strong cognitive anchor, they can be revised in light of new and compelling information. However, overcoming a negative first impression is a cognitively effortful process that requires time, consistency, and strategic action. This section examines the psychological barriers to changing impressions and explores the evidence-based frameworks for successfully repairing them.

The Challenge of Revision: Why First Impressions Stick

The persistence of first impressions is a robust finding in social psychology.2 This "stickiness" is not simply a matter of stubbornness but is a direct consequence of the cognitive architecture discussed in Section 3. The Primacy Effect ensures that initial information serves as the foundation for the entire impression, coloring the interpretation of all subsequent data.3 The Halo Effect then generalizes this initial assessment, creating a coherent but potentially inaccurate global judgment.47 Finally, Confirmation Bias actively works to maintain this initial judgment by causing individuals to selectively seek out and favor information that supports their impression while ignoring or dismissing contradictory evidence.52 This cognitive trifecta makes changing a first impression a significant challenge. The brain's default state is to conserve cognitive energy; revising a well-formed schema requires effortful, conscious processing to override the automatic, heuristic-based initial judgment. As a result, people tend to cling to their first impressions, even when presented with evidence to the contrary.2

Frameworks for Repairing a Bad First Impression

Despite these cognitive hurdles, it is possible to overcome a poor first impression. Research in psychology and communication has identified several key strategies that can facilitate impression updating. These strategies generally focus on providing a consistent stream of new, positive information that is strong enough to force a re-evaluation of the initial negative judgment. A study from Harvard University suggests that it can take as many as eight subsequent positive encounters to successfully reverse a single negative first impression.128 This highlights the importance of consistency and persistence. A single grand gesture is often less effective than a series of smaller, reliable, and positive interactions. Over time, the cumulative weight of this new evidence can begin to outweigh the initial negative anchor. Consistently demonstrating competence, warmth, and reliability provides the necessary data for the other person's brain to begin the effortful process of updating their schema.3 Another effective strategy is to directly acknowledge the misstep. Instead of ignoring the awkward initial encounter, a straightforward and sincere acknowledgment can reframe the situation and demonstrate self-awareness and humility. An approach such as, "I feel like we got off on the wrong foot, and I was a bit nervous. I'd appreciate the chance to start over," can be disarming and effective.3 Providing a brief, honest explanation for the behavior (e.g., "I was distracted by a personal matter") without making excuses can also foster empathy and encourage the other person to reconsider their initial judgment.42 Research also suggests that the type of information presented is critical. Impressions are more significantly influenced by information related to morality (e.g., honesty, integrity) than by information related to sociability or competence.133 This "moral primacy effect" means that a negative impression can be most effectively improved by demonstrating positive moral character. For example, if someone initially comes across as incompetent, demonstrating honesty and integrity in a subsequent interaction will do more to repair the overall impression than simply demonstrating competence.134 Finally, a subtle but powerful strategy involves appealing to the other person's self-concept as a fair and open-minded individual. Psychologists refer to this as the "egalitarian goal".129 By complimenting someone on their fairness or open-mindedness, one can subtly prompt them to act in accordance with that self-image and give the benefit of the doubt. This can lower their cognitive defenses and make them more receptive to new, positive information that contradicts their initial negative impression.129

The Role of Context and Time in Impression Updating

The ability to update an impression is also context-dependent. Some research suggests that implicit, or automatic, evaluations are more resistant to change than explicit, conscious judgments. While a person might consciously agree that their initial negative impression was wrong, their underlying "gut feeling" may persist.1 However, this is not always the case. Highly diagnostic and extreme new information—such as learning that a previously disliked person performed a heroic act—can sometimes lead to a rapid revision of even implicit attitudes.1 Ultimately, time and continued interaction are the most reliable agents of change. As colleagues work together on projects or as new friends share more experiences, the initial "thin slice" of information is replaced by a much thicker and more nuanced dataset. This accumulation of new information provides the necessary evidence to either confirm or, with sufficient consistency, overturn the initial impression, allowing for the development of a more accurate and complex understanding of the other person.135

Conclusion: Navigating the Complexities of Human Perception

The formation of a first impression is a testament to the remarkable efficiency and profound complexity of the human brain. It is a process that begins in the earliest moments of life, is honed by millions of years of evolutionary pressure, and is executed in fractions of a second. This report has deconstructed this phenomenon, revealing it to be a multifaceted interplay of rapid neural processing, subconscious cognitive shortcuts, developmental learning, and socio-cultural modulation. The scientific evidence demonstrates that first impressions are not trivial. They are initiated by an automatic, amygdala-driven appraisal system designed for a fundamental survival task: the "friend-or-foe" assessment. This system rapidly processes a rich stream of non-verbal data—from the subtle geometry of a face to the tone of a voice and the cut of a suit—to generate an immediate "gut feeling" about another's intentions and capabilities. This initial judgment is then seized upon by a host of cognitive biases, most notably the Primacy and Halo effects, which solidify the impression into a coherent, though often oversimplified, narrative. Confirmation bias then acts as a cognitive sentinel, defending this initial narrative from contradictory evidence and rendering it powerfully persistent. However, the process is not purely deterministic. The maturation of the medial prefrontal cortex provides a neural substrate for more nuanced social cognition, allowing for the conscious updating and revision of these initial judgments. This capacity for revision, though cognitively effortful, underscores the dynamic nature of person perception. Furthermore, the meaning of the cues that fuel our impressions is not absolute; it is filtered through the lenses of situational context and cultural norms. What signals confidence in one setting may signal arrogance in another; what is respectful in one culture may be offensive in another. This contextual dependency highlights a critical limitation of our automatic impression-formation system: it is inherently egocentric, projecting our own learned rules and expectations onto others. Understanding the science of first impressions carries significant implications. It illuminates the deep-seated roots of social bias and discrimination, showing how rapid, unconscious judgments based on superficial cues can lead to systemic inequities in hiring, justice, and social interactions.16 It also provides a framework for more effective communication and impression management, enabling individuals to navigate social and professional worlds with greater intentionality. Most importantly, it fosters a crucial form of cognitive humility. By recognizing the powerful, automatic, and often fallible nature of our own initial judgments, we can learn to treat our first impressions not as infallible truths, but as preliminary hypotheses—to be acknowledged, questioned, and consciously updated with the richer, more complex data that only time and genuine engagement can provide. In the intricate dance of human interaction, the first step is swift and automatic, but the journey toward true understanding requires a slower, more deliberate, and more mindful path. 참고 자료 How Does Reinterpretation Influence Our First Impressions? | Keller Center for Research, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://kellercenter.hankamer.baylor.edu/news/story/2016/how-does-reinterpretation-influence-our-first-impressions First Impressions | Psychology Today, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/first-impressions The Psychology of First Impressions: What Happens in the First Seven Seconds of Meeting, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://maclynninternational.us/blog/the-psychology-of-first-impressions-what-happens-in-the-first-seven-seconds-of-meeting/ 5 Tips for Making a Great First Impression in Under 30 Seconds - the SDCBA, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.sdcba.org/?pg=FTR-Mar-2018-4 Thin-Slicing Judgments In Psychology, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.simplypsychology.org/thin-slicing-psychology.html Thin slices of behavior - TSpace, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://utoronto.scholaris.ca/items/b6c7b338-7149-487a-8bff-151ec03812eb Snap Judgments Work! | Harvard Magazine, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2001/07/snap-judgments-work-html Thin Slices & First Impressions - Psychology Today, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/beyond-words/201203/thin-slices-first-impressions Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis - Index of /, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://courses.media.mit.edu/2004fall/mas921/Ambady%20Rosenthal%201992.pdf Thin-slicing - Wikipedia, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thin-slicing Half a Minute: Predicting Teacher Evaluations From Thin Slices of Nonverbal Behavior and Physical Attractiveness - CiteSeerX, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=c3e5eb6e36b08679ffb3b57bde59c3cb5e546962 First impression (psychology) | EBSCO Research Starters, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/psychology/first-impression-psychology www.ebsco.com, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/psychology/first-impression-psychology#:~:text=More%20than%20one%20hundred%20studies,awareness%20and%20requiring%20no%20cognitive Todorov explores the 'Irresistible Influence of First Impressions' - Princeton University, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.princeton.edu/news/2017/10/16/todorov-explores-irresistible-influence-first-impressions Snap judgments decide a face's character, psychologist finds, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.princeton.edu/news/2006/08/22/snap-judgments-decide-faces-character-psychologist-finds Snap-Judgment Science, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/snap-judgment-science EvaluaTiNg faCES ON TruSTwOrThiNESS afTEr miNimal TimE ExpOSurE - Humintell, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.humintell.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/TPO09.pdf (PDF) Evaluating Faces on Trustworthiness After Minimal Time Exposure - ResearchGate, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228692172_Evaluating_Faces_on_Trustworthiness_After_Minimal_Time_Exposure CHAPTER 4 - Evaluating Faces on Social Dimensions - Alexander Todorov, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://bpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/voices.uchicago.edu/dist/f/3051/files/2021/02/Todorov_Chap4EvaluatingFacesonSocialDimensions.pdf Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18721917/ The Science of First Impressions | Psychology Today, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-science-luck/201302/the-science-first-impressions Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions - PubMed, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18951830/ Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions - Andrew D. Engell, Ph.D., 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.andrewengell.com/PDFs/Todorov%20Understanding%20evaluation%20of%20faces%20on%20socia.pdf Do Characteristics of Faces That Convey Trustworthiness and Dominance Underlie Perceptions of Criminality? | PLOS One - Research journals, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0037253 Evaluating face trustworthiness: A model based approach - ResearchGate, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23479358_Evaluating_face_trustworthiness_A_model_based_approach Evaluating face trustworthiness: a model based approach - PMC, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2555464/ How do facial attributes dramatically affect judgements of trustworthiness? - Quora, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.quora.com/How-do-facial-attributes-dramatically-affect-judgements-of-trustworthiness Judgements of Social Dominance From Faces and Related Variables - Frontiers, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873147/full facial stereotypes of competence (not trustworthiness or dominance) most resemble facial - UCSB Social Perception Lab, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://spl.psych.ucsb.edu/publication/journal-article/facial-stereotypes-of-competence/Facial%20stereotypes%20of%20competence.pdf Mastering Nonverbal Cues in Interviews: Key Tips - Final Round AI, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.finalroundai.com/blog/mastering-nonverbal-cues-in-interviews-key-tips Master Your Body Language to Create a Great First Impression - Medium, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://medium.com/@anupama-mathew/how-to-master-body-language-for-a-great-first-impression-17afba6c9eaf 5 (Non-Verbal) Ways to Make a Great First Impression - TPD | Workforce Solutions, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://tpd.com/blog/5-ways-make-great-first-impression-body-language/ The Psychology of First Impressions: Appearance, Communication, and Confidence, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://bodyzone.com/the-psychology-of-first-impressions-appearance-communication-and-confidence/ How to Understand Body Language and Facial Expressions, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.verywellmind.com/understand-body-language-and-facial-expressions-4147228 Non Verbal Communication - Andrews University, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.andrews.edu/~tidwell/bsad560/NonVerbal.html First impressions count - American Psychological Association, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.apa.org/gradpsych/2012/11/first-impressions The influence of clothing on first impressions: Rapid and positive responses to minor changes in male attire - University of Hertfordshire (Research Profiles), 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://researchprofiles.herts.ac.uk/files/2747442/906722.pdf The Science Of First Impressions: How Grooming Shapes Perception - Hello Lovely Living, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.hellolovelyliving.com/blog/the-science-of-first-impressions-how-grooming-shapes-perception Dressing For Success: How Personal Appearance Influences Your Career, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://blog.lucywalkerrecruitment.com/dressing-for-success-how-personal-appearance-influences-your-career The Psychology of Dressing: How Your Wardrobe Influences Confidence and Success, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://kleinepsteinparker.com/blogs/seasonal-style-guide/the-psychology-of-dressing (PDF) The influence of clothing on first impressions: Rapid and positive responses to minor changes in male attire - ResearchGate, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256846903_The_influence_of_clothing_on_first_impressions_Rapid_and_positive_responses_to_minor_changes_in_male_attire How to Make a Good First Impression - Verywell Mind, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.verywellmind.com/make-a-good-first-impression-7197993 Statistics on How Outfit Choices Influence First Impressions on Dates | Grapevine Birmingham, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.grapevinebirmingham.com/statistics-on-how-outfit-choices-influence-first-impressions-on-dates/ The Power Of First Impressions: 5 Tips That Can Impact Your Business, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesbusinesscouncil/2024/04/08/the-power-of-first-impressions-5-tips-that-can-impact-your-business/ The Science of a Good First Impression - Toastmasters International, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.toastmasters.org/magazine/magazine-issues/2025/may/the-science-of-a-good-first-impression Halo Effect: Why We Judge a Book by Its Cover - Positive Psychology, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://positivepsychology.com/halo-effect/ Halo effect - Wikipedia, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo_effect Halo Effect | Psychology Today, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/halo-effect Halo Effect - Ethics Unwrapped, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/glossary/halo-effect Halo Effect Bias In Psychology: Definition & Examples, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.simplypsychology.org/halo-effect.html The Halo Effect in Psychology - Verywell Mind, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-the-halo-effect-2795906 The Halo Effect: How First Impressions Shape Our Judgments - Psychology for everyone, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://upseducation.com/the-halo-effect-how-first-impressions-shape-our-judgments/ What Is Halo and Horn Effect & How It Impacts Hiring? - WeCP, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.wecreateproblems.com/blog/halo-and-horn-effect Impression formation - Wikipedia, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impression_formation 5.1 Initial Impression Formation – Principles of Social Psychology - BC Open Textbooks, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://opentextbc.ca/socialpsychology/chapter/initial-impression-formation/ Halo effect - The Decision Lab, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/halo-effect Confirmation Bias - The Decision Lab, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/confirmation-bias The First Impression Bias - The Decision Lab, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://thedecisionlab.com/reference-guide/psychology/the-first-impression-bias Brain: Parts, Function, How It Works & Conditions - Cleveland Clinic, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/22638-brain Brain Anatomy and How the Brain Works | Johns Hopkins Medicine, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/anatomy-of-the-brain Novel Insights into the Social Functions of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex during Infancy, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.eneuro.org/content/12/5/ENEURO.0458-24.2025 The Role of Medial Prefrontal Cortex in Memory and Decision Making - PubMed Central, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3562704/ The neural dynamics of updating person impressions - PMC, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3739907/ Distinctive roles of mPFC subregions in forming impressions and guiding social interaction based on others' social behaviour, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9714428/ (PDF) Distinctive Roles of MPFC Subregions in Forming Impressions and Guiding Social Interaction Based on Others' Social Behaviour - ResearchGate, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360655912_Distinctive_Roles_of_MPFC_Subregions_in_Forming_Impressions_and_Guiding_Social_Interaction_Based_on_Others'_Social_Behaviour The Updating of First Impressions | Request PDF - ResearchGate, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373550923_The_Updating_of_First_Impressions Interfering with activity in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex via TMS, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://collaborate.princeton.edu/en/publications/interfering-with-activity-in-the-dorsomedial-prefrontal-cortex-vi Functional connectivity between the amygdala and prefrontal cortex underlies processing of emotion ambiguity - PubMed Central, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10613296/ Prefrontal–Amygdala Pathways for Object and Social Value Representation - PMC, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11602012/ pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6126855/#:~:text=Results%20showed%20that%20infants%20preferred,the%20faces%20were%20upside%20down. Infants prefer a trustworthy person: An early sign of social cognition in infants - PubMed, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30188941/ Infants prefer a trustworthy person: An early sign of social cognition in infants | PLOS One, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0203541 The perception of facial expressions in newborns - PMC, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2836746/ Why do infants preferentially attend to trustworthy faces? Exploring the role of facial affect - OSF, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://osf.io/57pc3/download Impression Formation in the Human Infant Brain - PMC - PubMed Central, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7592636/ What Is Social Referencing in Child Development? An Easy Explanation, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.rasmussen.edu/degrees/education/blog/what-is-social-referencing-in-child-development/ Social Referencing - DePauw University, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.depauw.edu/learn/lab/publications/documents/infant%20development/2010_Infant_development_Social_referencing.pdf Social Referencing: Defining and Delineating a Basic Process of Emotion - Interpersonal Development Lab, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://idlab.ucmerced.edu/sites/g/files/ufvvjh1066/f/page/documents/walle_reschke_knothe_-_revision_2.pdf www.rasmussen.edu, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.rasmussen.edu/degrees/education/blog/what-is-social-referencing-in-child-development/#:~:text=Similar%20to%20a%20child's%20own,learn%20how%20to%20react%20themselves. Inferring Character From Faces: A Developmental Study - PMC - PubMed Central, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5580985/ Young Children Form First Impressions From Faces - Association for Psychological Science, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.psychologicalscience.org/news/releases/young-children-form-first-impressions-from-faces.html Inferring Character From Faces: A Developmental Study - Princeton University, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://collaborate.princeton.edu/en/publications/inferring-character-from-faces-a-developmental-study Children Use Targets' Facial Appearance to Guide and Predict Social Behavior, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://banaji.sites.fas.harvard.edu/research/publications/articles/2019_Charlesworth_DevPsy.pdf Facial impressions of niceness influence children's interpretations of peers' ambiguous behavior - Bohrium, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://bohrium.dp.tech/paper/arxiv/38981332 Developing adolescents: A reference for professionals, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.apa.org/topics/teens/developing-adolescents-professionals-reference Social cognition in adolescence: A tribute to Sandy (A. E.) Jackson (1937–2003): A Special Issue of the European Journal of Developmental Psychology - ResearchGate, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330436966_Social_cognition_in_adolescence_A_tribute_to_Sandy_A_E_Jackson_1937-2003_A_Special_Issue_of_the_European_Journal_of_Developmental_Psychology Social Influence in Adolescent Decision-Making: A Formal Framework - Frontiers, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01915/full “No more a child, not yet an adult”: studying social cognition in adolescence - Frontiers, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01011/full Confirming First Impressions in the Employment Interview - ResearchGate, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232418644_Confirming_First_Impressions_in_the_Employment_Interview Impression Management in the Job Interview: An Effective Way of Mitigating Discrimination against Older Applicants? - PubMed Central, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5432631/ Looking for romance? That first impression matters | University of ..., 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/looking-romance-first-impression-matters The Impact of First Impressions. How Initial Encounters Shape Our… | by Keshav Rana | The Inner Compass | Medium, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://medium.com/the-inner-compass/the-impact-of-first-impressions-3a4606cc075c How to Make a Good First Impression: 7 Tips for Success - Highrise Coaching, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.tryhighrise.com/blog-posts/how-to-make-a-good-first-impression Virtual first impressions: Zoom backgrounds affect judgements of trust and competence, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10529556/ Are first impressions on Zoom the same as face-to-face? - British Psychological Society, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.bps.org.uk/research-digest/are-first-impressions-zoom-same-face-face Tips for Making a Good Impression in Virtual Meetings | Student Success | The University of Southern Mississippi, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.usm.edu/student-success/tips-virtual-meetings.php 5 Ways to Make a Good First Impression Over Zoom - Effective Presentations, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://effectivepresentations.com/blog/make-a-good-first-impression-on-zoom/ Culture, Personality, and Perception | Introduction to Communication CST 110, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://courses.lumenlearning.com/zelicst110/chapter/culture-personality-and-perception/ Cultural Differences in Body Language to be Aware of – VirtualSpeech, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://virtualspeech.com/blog/cultural-differences-in-body-language 4.4 Nonverbal Communication and Culture - Maricopa Open Digital Press, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://open.maricopa.edu/com110/chapter/4-4-nonverbal-communication-in-context/ Cross-Cultural Psychology, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/cross-cultural-psychology Cross-Cultural Research on the Five-Factor Model of Personality - ScholarWorks@GVSU, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1038&context=orpc Implicit Theories and Self-Perceptions of Traitedness Across Cultures - ResearchGate, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247724013_Implicit_Theories_and_Self-Perceptions_of_Traitedness_Across_Cultures Culture, Cross-Role Consistency, and Adjustment: Testing Trait and Cultural Psychology Perspectives - PMC, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2552975/ Impression management - Wikipedia, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impression_management Understanding Impression Management: Strategies for Success - NetReputation, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.netreputation.com/impression-management-what-is-it/ Goffman on the Presentation of Self - New Learning Online, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://newlearningonline.com/literacies/chapter-12/goffman-on-the-presentation-of-self The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life - Wikipedia, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Presentation_of_Self_in_Everyday_Life The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life: A Synopsis | by Bookey | Medium, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://medium.com/@bookey.en/the-presentation-of-self-in-everyday-life-a-synopsis-a5957266662a 108: Presentation of Self in Everyday Life - Goffman - Talking About Organizations Podcast, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.talkingaboutorganizations.com/108-presentation-of-self-in-everyday-life-goffman/ Dramaturgical Analysis | EBSCO Research Starters, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/drama-and-theater-arts/dramaturgical-analysis Erving Goffman's Front-Stage and Backstage Behavior - ThoughtCo, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.thoughtco.com/goffmans-front-stage-and-back-stage-behavior-4087971 Dramaturgy In Sociology - Simply Psychology, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.simplypsychology.org/dramaturgy-in-sociology.html Self-Presentation and Impression Management | Social Psychology Class Notes - Fiveable, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://library.fiveable.me/social-psychology/unit-4/self-presentation-impression-management/study-guide/ZSSpnDUS8IMRMSMD Erving Goffman's The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://web.pdx.edu/~tothm/theory/Presentation%20of%20Self.htm In Erving Goffman's dramaturgy, the back stage is con- trasted with the front stage; it is the space in which people can relax - Sage Publishing, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-assets/21315_book_item_21315.pdf Impression Management: How to Influence the Way Others See You - Verywell Mind, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.verywellmind.com/impression-management-8619231 Ingratiation and Self-Promotion Children's differentiation between ingratiati - Royal Holloway Research Portal, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://pure.royalholloway.ac.uk/ws/files/6360354/Watling_Banerjee_in_press_b.pdf (PDF) Impression Management Tactics in the Workplace: Enhancing or Compromising the Employee Performance? - ResearchGate, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380293484_Impression_Management_Tactics_in_the_Workplace_Enhancing_or_Compromising_the_Employee_Performance The Science of First Impressions: What Your Social Media Profile Says About You, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://frogmanmediagroup.com/the-science-of-first-impressions-what-your-social-media-profile-says-about-you/ The Power of First Impressions: Why Your Social Media Profile Photos and Covers Matter, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.socialpreviewing.com/blog/the-power-of-first-impressions-why-your-social-media-profile-photos-and-covers-matter Social Media: The First Impression is the Last Impression | by Cre8ive Mind | Medium, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://medium.com/@cre8iveminddesign/social-media-the-first-impression-is-the-last-impression-cd4c5abea860 The Importance of a Digital First Impression - Homemade Social, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.homemadesocial.com/blog/2020/8/24/the-importance-of-a-digital-first-impression Impression Management in Social Media: The Example of LinkedIn, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISSN/1854-4231/11_203-212.pdf The Art of Impression Management in Social Networks - Number Analytics, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/impression-management-in-social-networks Playful Backstalking and Serious Impression Management: How Young Adults Reflect on their Past Identities on Facebook - Annenberg School for Communication - University of Pennsylvania, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.asc.upenn.edu/sites/default/files/2021-03/Playful%20backstalking%20and%20serious%20impression%20management-%20How%20young%20adults%20reflect%20on%20their%20past%20identities%20on%20Facebook.pdf The Science of First Impressions - Zoom, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://explore.zoom.us/media/science-first-impressions-report-new.pdf www.thehedgescompany.com, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.thehedgescompany.com/the-do-over-how-to-correct-a-bad-first-impression/#:~:text=A%20Harvard%20study%20revealed%20that,a%20one%2Dtime%20splashy%20event. Using psychology to fix a bad first impression - everywoman, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.everywoman.com/my-development/using-psychology-fix-bad-first-impression/ The Do-Over: How To Correct A Bad First Impression - The Hedges Company, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.thehedgescompany.com/the-do-over-how-to-correct-a-bad-first-impression/ How to Recover From a Bad First Impression - Jordan Harbinger, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.jordanharbinger.com/how-to-recover-from-a-bad-first-impression/ Overcoming a Bad First Impression: 7 Tips - Thriveworks Counseling, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://thriveworks.com/blog/overcoming-bad-first-impression/ Changing impressions_ Moral character dominates impression updating - Marco Brambilla, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.mbrambilla.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Brambilla-et-al-2019-Impression-Updating.pdf How to Overcome a Poor First Impression | Psychology Today, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/why-bad-looks-good/202301/how-to-overcome-a-poor-first-impression How to Make a Good First Impression | The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.chicagobooth.edu/magazine/how-to-make-a-good-first-impression Reactions to Discrimination, Stigmatization, Ostracism, and Other Forms of Interpersonal Rejection: A Multimotive Model - PMC - PubMed Central, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2763620/ Consequences of Attributing Discrimination to Implicit vs. Explicit Bias - OSF, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/42j7v/download/?format=pdf The Psychology of First Impressions, Prejudice and Discrimination., 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://mentalhealthnursetraining.wordpress.com/2012/12/01/first-impressions-prejudice-discrimination/ Is It Ethical to Use Social Media and Digital Footprints in Talent Assessments? - TestHiring, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://testhiring.com/blog/is-it-ethical-to-use-social-media-and-digital-footprints-in-talent-assessments How Snap Judgments Can Lead Bargainers Astray In Negotiations, 8월 2, 2025에 액세스, https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/dealing-with-difficult-people-daily/how-snap-judgments-can-lead-negotiators-astray-in-negotiation-conversations/