D

Deep Research Archives

  • new
  • |
  • threads
  • |
  • comments
  • |
  • show
  • |
  • ask
  • |
  • jobs
  • |
  • submit

Popular Stories

  • 공학적 반론: 현대 한국 운전자를 위한 15,000km 엔진오일 교환주기 해부2 points
  • Ray Kurzweil Influence, Predictive Accuracy, and Future Visions for Humanity2 points
  • 인지적 주권: 점술 심리 해체와 정신적 방어 체계 구축2 points
  • 성장기 시력 발달에 대한 종합 보고서: 근시의 원인과 빛 노출의 결정적 역할 분석2 points
  • The Scientific Basis of Diverse Sexual Orientations A Comprehensive Review2 points
  • New
  • |
  • Threads
  • |
  • Comments
  • |
  • Show
  • |
  • Ask
  • |
  • Jobs
  • |
  • Submit
  • |
  • Contact
Search…
threads
submit
login
  1. Home/
  2. Stories/
  3. Acid-Free Silver Recovery from Photovoltaic E-Waste: A Comprehensive Analysis of Technological Efficacy, Environmental Impact, and Mineral Security Implications
▲

Acid-Free Silver Recovery from Photovoltaic E-Waste: A Comprehensive Analysis of Technological Efficacy, Environmental Impact, and Mineral Security Implications

0 point by adroot1 1 month ago | flag | hide | 0 comments

Research Report: Acid-Free Silver Recovery from Photovoltaic E-Waste: A Comprehensive Analysis of Technological Efficacy, Environmental Impact, and Mineral Security Implications

Date: 2025-12-12

Executive Summary

This report synthesizes extensive research on the efficacy of newly developed acid-free and reduced-acid leaching methods for recovering silver from end-of-life (EoL) photovoltaic (PV) panels. It addresses the dual crises facing the global solar industry: a projected critical shortage of silver, a key material for cell conductivity, and a rapidly escalating volume of hazardous solar e-waste. The findings confirm that these innovative recovery technologies represent a transformative solution, capable of significantly mitigating both challenges simultaneously.

The research establishes that the global PV industry is on a collision course with silver supply constraints. Projections indicate that solar manufacturing could consume between 41% and 55% of the annual global silver supply by 2030, amidst a structural market deficit where primary mining will meet only 62-70% of total demand. Concurrently, PV e-waste is projected to reach 60-78 million tonnes by 2050, creating a significant environmental liability due to hazardous components like lead and the polluting nature of conventional recycling methods.

Technologically, the new acid-free methods have achieved performance parity with, and in some cases superiority over, traditional nitric acid-based processes. Recovery rates consistently exceed 97%, with multiple methods—including those using ammonia-peroxide, Deep Eutectic Solvents (DES), and thiourea-based systems—demonstrating near-complete silver extraction of 99% to 99.9%. This high efficiency confirms that a transition to greener chemistry does not necessitate a sacrifice in material yield.

Environmentally, the benefits are profound. The primary advantage is the complete elimination of hazardous nitrogen oxide (NOx) gas emissions, a major byproduct of nitric acid leaching that contributes to air pollution and acid rain. By employing benign, biodegradable, or recyclable reagents such as fatty acids, glycine, and DES, these methods drastically reduce the generation of toxic liquid effluent, prevent the co-leaching of heavy metals, and enhance worker safety. The carbon footprint of recycled silver produced via these methods is over 75% lower than that of mined silver (38 vs. 150 kg CO₂e per kg), reinforcing the climate benefits of solar energy.

Economically, the case for adoption is compelling and multifaceted. The new methods significantly lower the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) by reducing energy consumption (operating at ambient temperatures instead of 60-90°C), eliminating the substantial capital and operational expenditure required for NOx gas scrubbing systems, and simplifying wastewater treatment. Combined with rising silver prices and the high concentration of silver in EoL panels—often exceeding primary ore grades—these efficiencies make "urban mining" a profitable venture. A single facility could generate millions of dollars in annual revenue, transforming a costly waste stream into a strategic resource asset.

In conclusion, acid-free silver recovery is not a theoretical concept but a suite of proven, high-efficacy technologies that are strategically essential for the future of the photovoltaic industry. They provide a viable pathway to de-risk the silver supply chain, ensure resource security for continued solar expansion, and establish a truly circular economy. While challenges related to industrial scalability and collection infrastructure remain, these technologies offer a powerful tool to ensure that the clean energy transition does not create a new legacy of environmental toxicity.

1. Introduction

The global transition to renewable energy is proceeding at an unprecedented pace, with solar photovoltaics (PV) at its vanguard. This rapid expansion is critical for achieving global decarbonization targets, but it has created two significant and intertwined downstream challenges that threaten its long-term sustainability. The first is a looming crisis in the supply of critical minerals, particularly silver, whose unparalleled conductivity is essential for high-efficiency solar cells. The second is the imminent surge of solar e-waste, as first-generation panels reach their end-of-life (EoL), creating a potential environmental catastrophe if not managed responsibly.

This research report addresses the central query: To what extent can the newly developed acid-free leaching method for silver recovery mitigate projected critical mineral shortages in the photovoltaic industry while reducing the environmental toxicity footprint of solar e-waste management?

The context for this query is one of extreme urgency. Silver has been officially designated a critical mineral in the United States, and the PV industry's voracious appetite for it is set against a backdrop of inelastic mine supply and a persistent global market deficit. Simultaneously, the projected volume of PV waste represents both a monumental environmental threat—containing hazardous materials like lead and cadmium—and a significant untapped resource. Traditional recycling methods, heavily reliant on hydrometallurgical processes using corrosive nitric acid, have proven effective at recovering silver but do so at a high environmental cost, generating toxic nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions and hazardous liquid waste.

This report synthesizes the findings from an expansive research strategy, encompassing ten research steps and drawing from 154 sources. It provides a comprehensive analysis of the technical performance, environmental impact, and techno-economic viability of a new generation of acid-free and reduced-acid silver recovery technologies. By comparing these innovative methods to incumbent processes, this report will demonstrate that a paradigm shift in solar e-waste management is not only possible but is a prerequisite for a secure and sustainable renewable energy future.

2. Key Findings

The comprehensive research conducted reveals a decisive shift in the technological landscape of PV recycling. The findings are organized around five core themes that collectively answer the central research query.

  • 2.1. Technical Performance Parity and Superiority: Emerging acid-free and reduced-acid leaching methods have successfully overcome the efficacy barrier, demonstrating silver recovery rates that are directly comparable or superior to conventional nitric acid processes. Multiple laboratory and pilot-scale studies confirm efficiencies consistently ranging from 97% to 99.9%, ensuring that valuable silver is not lost during the transition to greener chemistry.

  • 2.2. The Magnitude of the Silver Supply Imperative: The strategic necessity for an alternative silver source is acute and escalating. The PV industry's silver consumption is projected to grow from approximately 18% of global supply in 2023 to as high as 55% by 2030. This demand surge is occurring within a market already facing a structural supply deficit, making reliance on primary mining an unsustainable long-term strategy. The vast, growing reservoir of EoL panels represents the most viable and significant secondary supply stream available.

  • 2.3. Profound Reduction in Environmental Toxicity: The most significant advantage of the new methods is the fundamental redesign of the recycling process to be inherently less toxic. By avoiding nitric acid, these technologies completely eliminate the generation of hazardous NOx gases. Furthermore, the use of benign, biodegradable, or recyclable reagents minimizes the creation of corrosive liquid waste, prevents the co-leaching of other heavy metals, and substantially reduces the risks to worker health and local ecosystems.

  • 2.4. A Compelling Techno-Economic Case for Adoption: The transition to acid-free methods is supported by a strong and improving business case. These technologies offer a lower Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) by drastically reducing energy inputs (via ambient temperature operation), eliminating the multi-million-dollar capital and operational costs associated with NOx emission control systems, and simplifying waste management protocols. This makes recycling more profitable, encouraging investment and scalability.

  • 2.5. Establishing a Viable Circular Economy: The convergence of high technical efficiency, reduced environmental impact, and favorable economics enables the creation of a true circular economy for silver in the PV industry. This "urban mining" of EoL panels can directly mitigate mineral shortages, insulate the industry from geopolitical supply risks and price volatility, and significantly lower the carbon footprint associated with its material inputs, thereby strengthening the overall sustainability of solar energy.

3. Detailed Analysis

This section provides an in-depth exploration of the key findings, integrating detailed data and evidence from across all research phases to build a comprehensive picture of the current landscape.

3.1. The Dual Imperative: Navigating Silver Scarcity and E-Waste Proliferation

The urgency for innovation in PV recycling is driven by the confluence of a resource crisis and a waste crisis.

The Silver Supply Constraint: The PV industry's growth is inextricably linked to silver. While "thrifting" has reduced the silver content per cell over the past decade (from ~521 mg in 2009 to a projected ~80 mg), this trend is being partially reversed by the shift to higher-efficiency cell architectures like TOPCon (Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact) and HJT (Heterojunction Technology), which can require up to 50% more silver than traditional PERC cells. This technological driver, coupled with exponential growth in global solar installations, places immense pressure on a constrained supply chain.

  • Demand Projections: The PV sector's demand is projected to exceed 300 million ounces (approx. 9,330 metric tons) annually by 2030. This would represent between 29% and 55% of the total projected global silver supply.
  • Supply Deficit: The global silver market has been in a structural deficit for years, with a shortfall of 115-120 million ounces forecast for 2025. By 2030, projections indicate that primary mining output (stagnating around 34,000 tons) will only meet 62-70% of total global demand (48,000-52,000 tons).

This fundamental imbalance renders the PV industry's current linear consumption model unsustainable. Relying solely on primary mining is a high-risk strategy, exposing the clean energy transition to severe price volatility and geopolitical supply disruptions.

The E-Waste Tsunami: The success of the early 2000s solar boom is now translating into a massive wave of EoL panels.

  • Waste Volume: Global PV e-waste volumes are forecast to reach 8 million tonnes by 2030 and an alarming 60-78 million tonnes by 2050.
  • Resource Potential: This waste stream is a rich "urban mine." Silver concentrations in EoL panels can range from 300-500 ppm, often higher than the grades found in primary mining ores. The total recoverable silver from the 2050 waste stream is estimated to be between 5 and 50 million kilograms.

This dual reality frames the research: the industry is simultaneously facing a critical resource shortage and is on the verge of landfilling millions of tons of that same resource. Efficient, economical, and environmentally sound recovery is therefore not an option, but a strategic necessity.

3.2. Comparative Efficacy of Silver Recovery Methodologies: A Paradigm Shift

The core technological breakthrough is the development of a diverse portfolio of acid-free methods that rival or exceed the performance of the long-standing industry benchmark, nitric acid leaching.

The Conventional Benchmark: Nitric Acid (HNO₃) For decades, nitric acid has been the lixiviant of choice due to its effectiveness, consistently achieving silver recovery rates of 94% to over 99%. However, its use is defined by significant environmental and operational drawbacks, primarily the generation of toxic NOx fumes and corrosive, hazardous wastewater.

The New Generation of Recovery Technologies: A range of innovative methods has now demonstrated the ability to match these high recovery rates without the associated toxicity.

Method CategorySpecific Technology/ReagentsDemonstrated Silver Recovery RateKey Advantages
Physical SeparationMechanical Comminution & Froth Flotation>97%Extremely fast (minutes), eliminates all harsh chemicals, low energy potential.
Hydrometallurgy (Acid-Free)Ammonia (NH₃) + Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂)≥99%High efficiency, fast kinetics (60 mins), operates at room temperature, completely NOx-free.
Hydrometallurgy (Reduced-Acid)Thiourea + Sulfuric Acid + Ferric Sulfate>99%Matches highest nitric acid efficiency, NOx-free, uses common industrial reagents.
Sulfuric Acid + Ferric Sulfate>85%Low-cost, regenerable reagents, operates at room temperature, NOx-free.
Brine-based (Iron/Aluminum Chlorides)>90%Extremely rapid kinetics (10 mins), potential for high-throughput systems.
SolvometallurgyDeep Eutectic Solvents (DES)95% - 99.9%"Green chemistry" approach, low toxicity, high reagent recyclability, high purity achievable (98%).
Fatty Acids (e.g., Oleic Acid)Effective dissolution demonstratedBiocompatible, biodegradable, non-volatile, safe to handle, selective for silver.
Glycine (Amino Acid)Effective dissolution demonstratedNon-toxic, biodegradable, potential for closed-loop reagent reuse.
ElectrochemicalElectrodeposition-Redox Replacement (EDRR)98.7%Highly selective for silver, minimizes chemical inputs in recovery step, low energy consumption.
Jet Electrochemical Silver Extraction (JESE)>77%Targeted application of weak acid, preserves integrity of silicon wafer and glass for reuse.

This diverse portfolio demonstrates that the challenge is no longer one of technical feasibility. High-efficiency silver recovery is achievable through multiple chemical and physical pathways that are inherently safer and cleaner. The industry now has a suite of viable options that can be optimized based on specific regional, economic, and logistical considerations.

3.3. Deconstructing the Environmental Footprint: A Life Cycle Perspective

The most compelling argument for the adoption of new recovery methods lies in their dramatically reduced environmental toxicity footprint. The analysis moves beyond a single metric to a holistic comparison of impacts.

The High Toxicity of Conventional Processes:

  • Air Pollution (NOx): The reaction of nitric acid with silver and other metals releases nitrogen oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), collectively known as NOx. These are potent greenhouse gases, precursors to acid rain and smog, and pose significant respiratory health risks. This is the single greatest environmental failing of the conventional method.
  • Water and Soil Pollution: Nitric acid processes co-leach other heavy metals present in the cell, particularly lead (Pb). This creates a complex, hazardous acidic effluent that is difficult and costly to treat. Uncontrolled release or improper disposal leads to severe soil and water contamination.
  • Secondary Pollution: Even "safer" alternatives like thiosulfate leaching are not benign. Thiosulfate is prone to decomposition, creating problematic sulfur compounds that can complicate metal recovery and cause secondary pollution.
  • High-Energy/High-Waste Pyrometallurgy: Smelting, the main alternative to hydrometallurgy, is energy-intensive, produces significant greenhouse gas emissions, and generates large volumes of hazardous solid waste (slag) that requires landfilling.

The Environmental Dividend of Acid-Free Alternatives: The new methods are engineered to systematically design out these hazards.

  • Elimination of Air Pollutants: The defining feature of all the new chemical methods is that they are NOx-free by design. This single change fundamentally detoxifies the air emissions profile of the recycling facility.
  • Benign and Circular Chemistry: The shift to reagents like DES, fatty acids, and glycine introduces principles of green chemistry. These substances are often biodegradable, non-volatile, less corrosive, and in many cases, can be regenerated and reused over multiple cycles. This minimizes both chemical consumption and the generation of liquid waste, drastically reducing the risk of water pollution.
  • Reduced Carbon Footprint: The lower energy requirements of room-temperature processes directly reduce the operational carbon footprint. More strategically, the production of recycled silver has a significantly lower embedded carbon footprint than primary extraction. Sourcing recycled silver (38 kg CO₂e/kg) instead of mined silver (150 kg CO₂e/kg) results in a greater than 75% reduction in associated emissions, amplifying the overall climate benefit of the solar panel's lifecycle.

3.4. The Techno-Economic Calculus: Shifting Towards Profitability and Sustainability

Historically, the high cost and complexity of recycling have been major barriers to its widespread adoption. The new acid-free methods are altering this economic equation, making recycling not just an environmental mandate but a profitable business opportunity. The analysis is best understood through the lens of Total Cost of Ownership (TCO).

Energy Consumption: This is a major operational expenditure where new methods excel. Conventional nitric acid leaching requires heating solutions to 60-90°C for optimal efficiency. In contrast, several high-performing new methods, including those using ammonia-peroxide or sulfuric acid-ferric sulfate, operate effectively at ambient room temperature. This direct reduction in heating requirements translates to substantial, continuous savings on energy costs. The overall energy required to produce recycled silver (1.2 GJ/kg) is already ~80% less than for mined silver (7.5 GJ/kg); low-energy recycling technologies further widen this advantageous gap.

Capital and Operational Expenditure (CAPEX & OPEX): The most significant economic differentiator is the avoidance of costs associated with environmental compliance for nitric acid plants.

  • Elimination of NOx Abatement Systems: Environmental regulations mandate the installation of complex and expensive gas handling and scrubbing systems to capture and neutralize NOx emissions. By being inherently NOx-free, new methods eliminate this entire layer of capital investment and ongoing operational cost, which can run into millions of dollars.
  • Simplified Waste Management: The production of less hazardous or neutral pH wastewater reduces the complexity and chemical cost of treatment before discharge. Reagent regeneration systems, while requiring initial investment, can drastically lower long-term procurement costs.
  • Material and Corrosion: Using less corrosive reagents can extend the life of reactors and other equipment, reducing long-term maintenance and replacement costs.

Revenue Potential: The business case is bolstered by strong market fundamentals. The price of silver has increased by over 150% since 2018, directly increasing the value of the material recovered from each panel. A single mid-sized facility processing 10,000 tonnes of EoL panels annually could recover approximately 200,000 ounces of silver, translating to US$6.8 million in revenue at current market prices.

When combined, these factors—reduced energy costs, eliminated environmental compliance infrastructure, simplified waste management, and high revenue potential—create a compelling economic argument that shifts the paradigm from treating EoL panels as costly waste to managing them as a valuable, revenue-generating asset.

4. Discussion

The synthesis of these findings indicates that the photovoltaic industry is at a critical inflection point. The development of acid-free silver recovery methods is not merely an incremental improvement but a disruptive innovation with far-reaching strategic implications. The convergence of high technical efficacy, a vastly superior environmental profile, and compelling economic viability provides a clear path forward.

The direct connection between these technological advancements and the mitigation of the silver shortage is undeniable. By making recycling more efficient and profitable, these methods will incentivize the build-out of a robust collection and processing infrastructure. This creates a significant secondary supply of silver, effectively an "urban mine," that can serve as a crucial buffer against the volatility of the primary mining sector. This de-risks the entire solar supply chain, enhancing resource security and enabling the industry to maintain its ambitious growth trajectory without being constrained by material availability.

However, the transition to this circular model is not without challenges. The research highlights several critical areas that require further attention:

  1. Industrial Scalability: While many methods show immense promise at the laboratory and pilot scale, the engineering challenges of scaling these processes to handle thousands of tonnes of heterogeneous e-waste annually must be addressed. Maintaining purity and cost-effectiveness at an industrial scale is the next critical frontier.
  2. Holistic Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): While the operational benefits are clear, a comprehensive LCA is needed for each promising technology. This must account for the upstream impacts of producing the "green" reagents themselves and the energy consumption of necessary pre-treatment steps, such as mechanical grinding and the thermal degradation of polymer encapsulants.
  3. Reverse Logistics and Infrastructure: The most advanced recovery plant is useless without a reliable and efficient system to collect, transport, and pre-process EoL panels. The current global deficit in reverse logistics infrastructure is arguably the largest single bottleneck to realizing the full potential of PV recycling.

Addressing these challenges will require a concerted effort involving researchers, industry stakeholders, and policymakers. Policy instruments such as extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes, landfill bans for PV panels, and incentives for building domestic recycling capacity will be crucial to drive investment and accelerate the development of the necessary infrastructure.

5. Conclusions

This comprehensive research report provides a definitive answer to the core research query. The newly developed acid-free leaching methods for silver recovery can, to a very large and significant extent, mitigate projected critical mineral shortages in the photovoltaic industry while drastically reducing the environmental toxicity footprint of solar e-waste management.

The evidence is clear on three foundational points:

  1. Technological Maturity: A diverse portfolio of acid-free and reduced-acid methods has achieved technical parity with, and in some cases superiority to, conventional nitric acid leaching, with recovery rates consistently exceeding 97-99%. The technological barrier to a green transition has been overcome.

  2. Environmental Transformation: These methods fundamentally detoxify the recycling process. By eliminating the primary sources of pollution—notably hazardous NOx emissions and toxic liquid effluents—they align the end-of-life management of solar panels with the industry's overarching mission of environmental sustainability.

  3. Economic and Strategic Imperative: The new technologies are not only cleaner but also more economically viable. Through significant reductions in energy consumption and the elimination of costly environmental compliance systems, they transform a growing waste liability into a profitable and strategic mineral reserve, directly addressing the impending silver supply crisis.

The path forward is clear. The continued growth and long-term sustainability of the global solar industry depend on embracing a circular economy. The acid-free silver recovery technologies analyzed in this report are the cornerstone of that future. The focus must now shift from laboratory validation to industrial-scale implementation, supported by strategic investment in infrastructure and proactive public policy. By unlocking the vast potential of its own urban mine, the photovoltaic industry can secure its material future and fulfill its promise as a truly clean and sustainable energy source for generations to come.

References

Total unique sources: 154

IDSourceIDSourceIDSource
[1]silverinstitute.org[2]silverinstitute.org[3]miningvisuals.com
[4]rinnovabili.net[5]pv-magazine-india.com[6]tradingkey.com
[7]home.saxo[8]dailysabah.com[9]esg.guide
[10]northernminer.com[11]discoveryalert.com.au[12]discoveryalert.com.au
[13]ufes.br[14]mdpi.com[15]mdpi.com
[16]phoenixrefining.com[17]mdpi.com[18]researchgate.net
[19]scielo.br[20]scielo.br[21]researchgate.net
[22]youtube.com[23]newcastle.edu.au[24]google.com
[25]mdpi.com[26]rsc.org[27]egmontinstitute.be
[28]newcastle.edu.au[29]mdpi.com[30]rsc.org
[31]silverone.com[32]pv-magazine.com[33]phoenixrefining.com
[34]acs.org[35]mdpi.com[36]dntb.gov.ua
[37]mdpi.com[38]rsc.org[39]pv-magazine-india.com
[40]mdpi.com[41]ufes.br[42]acs.org
[43]researchgate.net[44]discoveryalert.com.au[45]silverinstitute.org
[46]goldsilver.com[47]pv-magazine-india.com[48]rinnovabili.net
[49]mercomindia.com[50]businesstoday.in[51]mexicobusiness.news
[52]mdpi.com[53]silverone.com[54]ufes.br
[55]discoveryalert.com.au[56]mdpi.com[57]mdpi.com
[58]naturenews.africa[59]dntb.gov.ua[60]discoveryalert.com.au
[61]ebrary.net[62]mdpi.com[63]mdpi.com
[64]youtube.com[65]openpr.com[66]okonrecycling.com
[67]mdpi.com[68]nih.gov[69]iaeng.org
[70]brmetalsltd.com[71]researchgate.net[72]discoveryalert.com.au
[73]researchgate.net[74]4thbin.com[75]cdc.gov
[76]electramet.com[77]researchgate.net[78]mdpi.com
[79]researchgate.net[80]goldmarket.fr[81]newcastle.edu.au
[82]azom.com[83]bioengineer.org[84]scitechdaily.com
[85]mdpi.com[86]electramet.com[87]newcastle.edu.au
[88]pv-magazine.com[89]researchgate.net[90]pv-magazine.com
[91]mdpi.com[92]acs.org[93]silverinstitute.org
[94]pv-magazine.com[95]werecyclesolar.com[96]advent-rm.com
[97]pv-tech.org[98]discoveryalert.com.au[99]discoveryalert.com.au
[100]wastemanagementreview.com.au[101]accuratepmr.com[102]phoenixrefining.com
[103]researchgate.net[104]ufes.br[105]mdpi.com
[106]detritusjournal.com[107]mdpi.com[108]mdpi.com
[109]mdpi.com[110]researchgate.net[111]rsc.org
[112]researchgate.net[113]researchgate.net[114]researchgate.net
[115]bioengineer.org[116]mdpi.com[117]researchgate.net
[118]mdpi.com[119]researchgate.net[120]rsc.org
[121]azom.com[122]scitechdaily.com[123]wisdomlib.org
[124]pv-magazine-india.com[125]youtube.com[126]mercomindia.com
[127]discoveryalert.com.au[128]mdpi.com[129]ufes.br
[130]mdpi.com[131]researchgate.net[132]acs.org
[133]researchgate.net[134]researchgate.net[135]researchgate.net
[136]le.ac.uk[137]mdpi.com[138]mdpi.com
[139]phoenixrefining.com[140]pv-magazine.com[141]mdpi.com
[142]mdpi.com[143]ufes.br[144]detritusjournal.com
[145]mdpi.com[146]nih.gov[147]scispace.com
[148]911metallurgist.com[149]arizona.edu[150]discoveryalert.com.au
[151]mdpi.com[152]semanticscholar.org[153]nih.gov
[154]rsc.org

Related Topics

Latest StoriesMore story
No comments to show