Deep Research Archives

The Great Divide: A Global Analysis of Intergenerational Conflict and Solidarity in the 21st Century

Introduction: From "Tteul-ttak" to "OK Boomer" – The New Language of a Global Generation Gap

In South Korea, younger generations have coined the derogatory term "tteul-ttak," mimicking the sound of clacking dentures to mock older individuals they perceive as stubborn and out of touch. Half a world away, the dismissive retort "OK Boomer" has become a global catchphrase, a digital eye-roll used by Millennials and Gen Z to shut down opinions they deem condescending or anachronistic.1 These are not isolated insults; they are potent, localized expressions of a new and increasingly hostile global dialogue between the young and the old. The user's query, originating from an observation of this very dynamic in Korea, highlights a phenomenon that has transcended national borders and cultural contexts to become a defining feature of the early 21st century. These phrases are more than just the latest slang. They are symptoms of a deep and widening fissure in the social fabric, signaling a breakdown of the implicit contract that has historically bound generations together. This contract, built on the premise that each generation would leave the world slightly better off for the next, appears to be collapsing under the weight of diverging economic realities, fragmenting cultural values, and polarizing political priorities. The generation gap of the 1960s, once defined by differing tastes in music and politics, has morphed into a chasm of economic disparity and perceived injustice.3 The core of the conflict has shifted from a debate over values to a struggle over resources. While acute intergenerational conflict is a defining feature of our time—driven by quantifiable economic disparities and amplified by the echo chambers of digital media—it is neither universal nor inevitable. The tensions are not an organic byproduct of the passage of time but the predictable outcome of specific policy choices and societal priorities. This report will argue that by juxtaposing nations experiencing severe generational friction with those that have successfully cultivated intergenerational solidarity, a clear pattern emerges: generational harmony is a product of deliberate, sustainable, and equitable policy, not a matter of cultural chance. To build this argument, this report will first establish a theoretical framework for understanding generational dynamics, defining ageism and the sociological concept of a "generation." It will then conduct an in-depth analysis of the primary economic and cultural drivers of conflict, from pension crises and housing unaffordability to political polarization. This analysis will be grounded in detailed case studies of extreme tension—such as the dehumanizing rhetoric of the COVID-19 pandemic and mass protests against economic exclusion—and contrasted with comprehensive examinations of successful models of solidarity found in the Nordic countries and Singapore. Finally, the report will offer a critical reassessment of the popular "generation war" narrative, arguing that it often serves to obscure deeper, class-based inequalities that cut across all age groups. By exploring these multifaceted dimensions, this report aims to provide a nuanced and evidence-based understanding of one of the most critical social challenges of our era and to illuminate the policy pathways toward forging a new, more durable intergenerational contract for the future.

Section 1: Understanding the Generational Lens: A Theoretical Framework

To comprehend the complex dynamics of intergenerational conflict, it is essential to first establish a clear analytical framework. This requires moving beyond anecdotal observations to a structured understanding of age-based prejudice, the formation of generational identities, and the distinct axes of inequality that shape their interactions.

1.1 Defining Ageism

At its core, much of the animosity between age groups is rooted in ageism. More than half a century ago, the psychiatrist Robert Butler first coined the term, defining it as a process of “systematic stereotyping of and discrimination against people because they are old, just as racism and sexism accomplish this with skin color and gender”.5 This foundational definition has since been expanded by global health bodies. The World Health Organization (WHO) provides a comprehensive framework that breaks ageism down into three distinct but interrelated components: stereotypes (how we think), prejudice (how we feel), and discrimination (how we act) towards others or oneself based on age.7 Crucially, this modern understanding reveals that ageism is not a unidirectional prejudice wielded only against the old. It is a pervasive force affecting people at every stage of life. Children as young as four internalize their culture's age-based stereotypes, which then guide their behavior toward others and inform their own self-perception.7 In Europe, for instance, data indicates that younger people report experiencing more age-based discrimination than any other age group, often facing stereotypes that dismiss their capabilities or limit their opportunities in the workplace.7 This recognition of reciprocal prejudice is fundamental to understanding why contemporary generational conflict often manifests as a two-way street of resentment and misunderstanding. The consequences of ageism are not merely social; they are profoundly detrimental to health and economic well-being. Systemic ageism is linked to poorer physical and mental health, slower recovery from disability, and even a shorter lifespan by an average of 7.5 years.7 It also carries a staggering economic cost. In the United States alone, one analysis attributed US$63 billion in annual healthcare spending for the eight most expensive health conditions directly to the impacts of ageism.7 Ageism, therefore, is not a trivial matter of unkindness but a systemic issue that generates significant global health and economic inequity.6

1.2 The Sociology of Generations

While ageism operates at the level of individual prejudice and institutional discrimination, the concept of a "generation" provides a framework for understanding collective identity and shared experience. The term "generation gap" entered the popular lexicon in the 1960s to describe the profound differences in music, values, and political views between the Baby Boomers and their parents' generation.3 This was a gap largely defined by culture and lifestyle. However, a more rigorous analytical tool is found in the work of sociologist Karl Mannheim. In his seminal 1928 essay, "The Problem of Generations," Mannheim distinguished the biological concept of a generation from the sociological one.10 For Mannheim, a "social generation" is not merely a group of people born within the same 15- or 20-year span. Rather, it is a cohort whose members have collectively experienced a significant historical event during their formative years (typically late adolescence and early adulthood). This shared experience shapes their social consciousness, their worldview, and their collective response to the world.10 Mannheim's theory provides a powerful lens through which to understand today's conflicts. A generation that came of age amidst the unprecedented post-war economic boom, like the Baby Boomers, was shaped by a context of expanding opportunity and institutional stability. Their worldview was forged in an era where it was reasonable to expect that hard work would lead to a secure job, homeownership, and a comfortable retirement. In stark contrast, a generation like the Millennials, whose formative years were defined by the 9/11 attacks, the 2008 global financial crisis, stagnant wages, and the rise of precarious "gig" work, developed a fundamentally different consciousness.10 Their worldview was shaped by instability, scarcity, and institutional failure. The contemporary generation gap, therefore, is not just a matter of different tastes; it is a clash of worldviews forged in radically different socio-historical contexts. The shift from a cultural gap to an economic one is a direct consequence of this divergence in formative experience. The conflict is no longer simply about what younger people believe, but about what economic future they can realistically expect compared to that of their predecessors.

1.3 The Two Axes of Inequality: Intergenerational vs. Intragenerational

To analyze generational conflict with precision, it is vital to distinguish between two different axes of fairness: intergenerational and intragenerational equity. Intergenerational equity refers to the concept of fairness or justice between different generations.16 This framework is applied to the distribution of resources, opportunities, and burdens over time. Key questions of intergenerational equity include: Is the current generation consuming resources (e.g., fossil fuels) in a way that imposes unfair costs (e.g., climate change) on future generations? Is the national debt being managed in a way that burdens the young to pay for the consumption of the old? Are public pension systems structured to be sustainable, or will they collapse, leaving future retirees with nothing? This axis of inequality is central to understanding the macro-level conflicts over pensions, housing, and environmental policy.17 Intragenerational equity, conversely, refers to fairness or justice within a single generation or cohort.21 This concept challenges the notion that generations are monolithic blocks. It forces an examination of the vast disparities in wealth, income, and opportunity that exist among people of the same age. For example, within the Baby Boomer generation, there is a world of difference between a wealthy homeowner with a robust investment portfolio and a low-income renter with minimal savings. Similarly, within the Millennial generation, there are profound divides based on race, educational attainment, and, increasingly, inherited wealth.19 Failing to make this distinction leads to dangerously simplistic and often misleading narratives. The popular trope of a "generation war" implicitly assumes that the primary conflict is intergenerational—pitting all young people against all old people. However, a more nuanced analysis, which will be developed later in this report, reveals that intragenerational inequality is just as, if not more, significant. The true lines of conflict may not be between generations, but between the haves and have-nots within each generation.

Section 2: The Economic Battleground: Scarcity, Security, and Opportunity

The abstract cultural disagreements of the past have been supplanted by tangible, high-stakes conflicts over finite economic resources. Today's intergenerational tensions are forged in the crucible of wealth inequality, unsustainable social security systems, inaccessible housing markets, and ballooning healthcare costs. These are not peripheral issues; they represent the core battlegrounds where the economic futures of different generations are being decided.

2.1 The Great Divergence: Generational Wealth and Income Disparity

The most fundamental driver of modern intergenerational conflict is the dramatic and accelerating divergence in economic fortunes between older and younger cohorts. Data from the United States Federal Reserve provides a stark illustration of this trend. In 1990, the distribution of national wealth was more evenly spread across the life cycle. Households under 40 held a respectable 11.8% of the nation's wealth, while the 55-69 age bracket held 37.2%. By the first quarter of 2024, this landscape had been radically transformed. The share of wealth held by those under 40 had plummeted to just 6.5%, while the share held by those aged 55-69 and 70+ had swelled to a combined 73.2%.22 Table 1: The Great Divergence: U.S. Household Wealth Distribution by Age Cohort (1990 vs. Q1 2024)

Age Cohort Total Wealth (Trillions, 2024 USD) - 1990 % of Total National Wealth - 1990 Total Wealth (Trillions, USD) - Q1 2024 % of Total National Wealth - Q1 2024 Under 40 $2.46 11.8% $9.90 6.5% 40 – 54 $6.65 31.9% $30.76 20.3% 55 – 69 $7.76 37.2% $64.13 42.3% 70+ $4.00 19.2% $46.89 30.9% Source: U.S. Federal Reserve.22 1990 wealth figures are illustrative based on percentage distribution.

When viewed through a generational lens, the disparity is even more pronounced. As of early 2024, the Baby Boomer generation (born 1946-1964) alone holds 51.8% of U.S. wealth, a staggering $78.55 trillion. In contrast, the Millennial generation (born 1981-1996), despite being a larger population group, holds just 9.4% of the nation's wealth.22 As a group, Baby Boomers are more than eight times wealthier than Millennials.23 This chasm is not merely a function of age; younger generations are objectively worse off than their predecessors were at the same stage of life. Millennials are on course to be the first modern generation to be poorer than their parents.24 Despite being the most educated generation in history, they have lower earnings, fewer assets, and significantly less net worth than Baby Boomers and Gen Xers did at a comparable age.14 This economic divergence forms the bedrock of resentment, fueling a narrative among the young of a system rigged in favor of their elders. This dynamic is further complicated by the much-heralded "Great Wealth Transfer." While estimates suggest that as much as $84 trillion will pass from Baby Boomers to their heirs over the next two decades, this will not be a panacea for generational inequality.26 The vast majority of this wealth is concentrated within the top 10% of Boomer households, meaning the inheritances will flow to a small, already-advantaged subset of Millennials and Gen Z.28 Moreover, the average age for a Millennial to inherit is 61, far too late to assist with critical early-life wealth-building milestones like purchasing a first home or starting a family.29 Rather than bridging the generational divide, this transfer is poised to carve a new, deeper chasm of intragenerational inequality, creating a stark class division between the inherited rich and the permanently precarious within the same younger cohort.

2.2 The Collapsing Contract: Pension and Social Security Crises

Nowhere is the zero-sum nature of intergenerational economic conflict more apparent than in the debates surrounding public pension systems. Designed in an era of high birth rates and strong economic growth, these pay-as-you-go (PAYG) systems are now buckling under the demographic pressures of aging populations and declining fertility, pitting the promises made to current retirees against the fiscal capacity of current workers. Table 2: Comparative Models of Old-Age Support Systems

Metric France South Korea Denmark Chile Funding Mechanism PAYG PAYG with Partial Funding Multi-Pillar (PAYG, Funded) Multi-Pillar (Funded, Solidarity) Retirement Age (Men) 64 (post-reform) 65 70 (by 2040) 65 Mandatory Contribution Rate Varies by sector 9% (employee + employer) Varies (incl. labor market schemes) 10% (employee) + 6% (employer, post-reform) Projected Fund Depletion N/A (PAYG) 2054 N/A (Sustainable) N/A (Funded) Key Reform Strategy Increase retirement age Increase contribution/replacement rates Link retirement age to longevity Multi-pillar system, increased employer contribution Source: Data compiled from.30

South Korea serves as an acute case study. The country's rapid transition to a super-aged society, coupled with the world's lowest birth rate, has placed its National Pension System (NPS) on a path to depletion by 2054. Maintaining the current system would require future generations to pay a contribution rate of around 35%—a prohibitively high burden.31 The recent, deeply contentious reform, which raised both contribution and replacement rates, was passed by lawmakers with an average age in their 50s and was met with fury from younger Koreans who saw it as a self-serving deal that mortgages their future to pay for the present.35 The conflict extends beyond pensions to the job market, where proposals to extend the retirement age to 65 are seen by the young as a direct threat, limiting job opportunities and depressing wages for those in their 30s and 40s.35 A similar dynamic played out in France in 2023, where the government's decision to raise the retirement age from 62 to 64 triggered massive, nationwide strikes involving millions of people.37 The protests were fueled by a perception that the reform was fundamentally unfair, disproportionately affecting those who began working at a young age in physically demanding jobs, while doing little to impact those with higher education who start careers later.30 The debate was framed almost entirely around plugging short-term deficits, with little consideration for long-term intergenerational solidarity, deepening the sense among the young that they were being forced to pay for a system from which they would never fully benefit.30

2.3 The Locked Door: The Global Housing Affordability Crisis

The dream of homeownership, once a cornerstone of middle-class identity and a primary vehicle for wealth accumulation, has become a source of profound generational anxiety and resentment. The emergence of "Generation Rent" describes the plight of younger cohorts in many developed nations who find themselves locked out of the property market by soaring prices and stagnant wages.38 This crisis is not a simple market fluctuation but a structural shift driven by the financialization of housing, where property is treated less as a home and more as a financial asset. This has led to a concentration of housing wealth among older generations who bought into the market when it was more affordable. In the United Kingdom, this has been a central theme of the intergenerational fairness debate. David Willetts' influential book, The Pinch, argues that the Baby Boomers have effectively "taken their children's future" through policies that inflated property values, benefiting existing homeowners at the expense of aspiring ones.39 For many young Britons, the only path to homeownership is through parental wealth, either via direct help with a deposit or the promise of a future inheritance, which further entrenches both inter- and intragenerational inequality.39 Japan offers a parallel yet distinct case. Following the collapse of its economic bubble in the late 1980s, the "Lost Generation" that came of age in the 1990s and 2000s faced diminished access to stable, full-time employment. While housing prices stabilized, the precarious labor market made it impossible for many to secure mortgages and follow the traditional path to homeownership.38 This has resulted in a dramatic increase in the proportion of young and middle-aged adults living with their parents, delaying independent household formation and other life milestones. The homeownership rate for Japanese aged 30-39 fell from 53.3% in 1983 to just 39% by 2008.38 In both the UK and Japan, the result is the same: a housing market that functions as a mechanism for transferring wealth upwards to older, asset-owning cohorts, while locking younger generations into a cycle of precarious renting.

2.4 The Cost of Longevity: The Political Economy of Aging and Healthcare

The final economic battleground is the allocation of public resources for healthcare. As populations in developed nations age, the demand for health and long-term care services is exploding, placing immense strain on public finances and creating a direct trade-off between spending on the old and investing in the young. In the United States, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects a fiscally unsustainable trajectory for healthcare spending. Driven by the aging of the population and rising per-person costs, total health spending is projected to climb from 16% of GDP in 2007 to 25% by 2025, and potentially as high as 49% by 2082.41 Federal spending on Medicare and Medicaid, the primary public insurance programs for the elderly and low-income individuals, is set to swell from 4% of GDP in 2007 to 19% by 2082.41 This creates a powerful political dynamic where retirees become an increasingly influential voting bloc, advocating for the protection and expansion of programs that benefit them.42 This can lead to a fiscal squeeze on other areas of government spending that primarily benefit the young, most notably education.42 This intergenerational conflict over budgetary priorities is exacerbated by the fact that health expenditures are heavily concentrated among the elderly. In developed countries, spending on healthcare increases sharply with age, particularly for long-term and nursing home care.43 The rising number of retirees, therefore, directly translates into rising fiscal pressure to divert resources from programs like education to healthcare, creating a clear conflict between the needs of the young and the old.42 This dynamic is not unique to the U.S.; it is a central challenge for all aging societies, forcing difficult choices about how to allocate finite public resources across the lifespan.45

Section 3: The Culture Clash: Values, Identity, and the Digital Divide

Beyond the stark realities of economic competition, the contemporary generational divide is defined and amplified by a profound clash of cultural values, political identities, and modes of communication. This cultural friction, while often expressed through seemingly frivolous memes and online arguments, reflects deep-seated differences in how generations perceive the world, their place in it, and the very nature of social progress.

3.1 The Memes of Discontent: "OK Boomer" as Cultural Retort

The phrase "OK Boomer" is perhaps the single most potent cultural artifact of the current generational conflict. Emerging from the digital ether of platforms like Reddit and TikTok in the late 2010s, it quickly became a global phenomenon.1 To dismiss it as a mere insult is to miss its sociological significance. The phrase has been described as marking "the end of friendly generational relations," functioning as a concise and cutting retort to any statement from an older person perceived as condescending, out of touch, or dismissive of the concerns of younger generations.1 The usage of "OK Boomer" is typically triggered by comments that downplay the severity of issues like climate change, that marginalize minority groups, or that attribute the economic struggles of the young to personal failings like laziness or a taste for "avocado toast" rather than structural factors.1 It is a verbal encapsulation of exhaustion and frustration. It signifies a rejection of the Boomer generation's perceived moral and intellectual authority, a declaration that their worldview is no longer accepted as the default or correct one.46 While critics have labeled the term as ageist, its proponents argue it is not about chronological age per se, but about a specific mindset—one that appears unwilling to acknowledge the vastly different economic and social realities faced by those who came after them.1 In this sense, "OK Boomer" is a tool of cultural counter-power, a way for a generation that feels economically and politically disenfranchised to reclaim a measure of control in the cultural discourse.

3.2 The Digital Agora: Social Media as a Conflict Accelerator

The arena in which this culture clash primarily plays out is the digital world. Social media platforms like Twitter (now X), TikTok, and Facebook have become the de facto public squares for intergenerational debate, but their architecture often serves to accelerate conflict rather than foster understanding.50 These platforms are designed for rapid, emotionally charged communication, which privileges concise, provocative statements—like "OK Boomer"—over nuanced, long-form discussion. Research on hashtags such as #BoomerRemover during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates how social media can become a vector for the perpetuation and magnification of generational stereotypes.51 Algorithmic content curation creates filter bubbles and echo chambers, where users are primarily exposed to content that confirms their existing biases. A young person frustrated with economic inequality is likely to be fed a constant stream of content reinforcing the "greedy geezer" stereotype, while an older person concerned about changing social norms may see endless videos mocking "woke snowflakes." This digital segregation prevents meaningful cross-generational dialogue and instead hardens identities, transforming differing perspectives into opposing tribes.53 While these platforms also host calls for intergenerational unity and understanding, the dominant dynamic is often one of conflict, as outrage and division are powerful drivers of user engagement.51

3.3 Generations at the Ballot Box: Political Polarization

The cultural and economic divides between generations are most consequentially manifested in their political behavior. Voting patterns across Western democracies reveal a stark and growing polarization by age, where the young and the old increasingly inhabit different political universes. Table 3: Generations at the Polls: Age-Based Voting in the Brexit Referendum (2016) and U.S. Presidential Election Polling (2024)

Event Age Group % For Progressive/Remain Option % For Conservative/Leave Option Brexit Referendum (2016) 18-24 71% (Remain) 29% (Leave)

25-49 54% (Remain) 46% (Leave)

50-64 40% (Remain) 60% (Leave)

65+ 36% (Remain) 64% (Leave) U.S. Presidential Election (2024 Polling) 18-29 (Likely Voters) 56% (Biden) 37% (Trump)

30-49 (Registered Voters) 57% (Harris) 34% (Trump)

50-64 (Registered Voters) 45% (Harris) 53% (Trump)

65+ (Registered Voters) 43% (Harris) 55% (Trump) Source: Brexit data from YouGov.54 U.S. data compiled from Harvard Institute of Politics Youth Poll 55 and Pew Research Center polling.56 U.S. data reflects polling from different periods in 2024 and should be seen as indicative of trends.

The 2016 Brexit referendum in the United Kingdom stands as a seminal example of this generational chasm. As Table 3 shows, the decision to leave the European Union was driven overwhelmingly by older voters. A staggering 71% of voters under 25 chose to Remain, a preference that was inverted among those over 65, 64% of whom voted to Leave.54 This age gradient was the single most dramatic fault line in the vote, cutting across traditional party allegiances. The divide was strongly correlated with education; 68% of university degree holders voted Remain, while 70% of those with only secondary school qualifications (GCSEs or lower) voted Leave.54 The result was a political outcome with profound, long-term consequences for the young, decided primarily by the votes of the old. A similar pattern of polarization is evident in the United States. Polling data consistently shows that younger voters are a core constituency of the Democratic Party, while older voters form the bedrock of the Republican base. The 2024 Harvard Youth Poll found that among likely voters aged 18-29, President Biden held a 19-point lead over Donald Trump.55 Conversely, polling of older demographics shows a consistent preference for the Republican candidate.56 This political divergence is not arbitrary; it reflects fundamentally different stances on key issues. Younger generations in both the U.S. and Europe are far more progressive on matters of social equality, racial justice, and, critically, climate change.4 They see these not as peripheral "culture war" topics but as existential threats to their future, a perspective often at odds with the priorities of older, more conservative electorates. This political polarization ensures that the generational conflict is not just fought on social media, but at the ballot box, with lasting consequences for national policy.

Section 4: Case Studies in Extreme Intergenerational Animosity

While economic friction and cultural disagreement form the background radiation of modern generational relations, certain moments of crisis can act as catalysts, transforming latent tensions into overt and extreme forms of animosity. The COVID-19 pandemic and the widespread youth protests against economic austerity in Europe provide two stark case studies of how intergenerational empathy can collapse under pressure, revealing the depths of resentment simmering beneath the surface.

4.1 "Boomer Remover": Dehumanization During a Global Crisis

The emergence of the term "Boomer Remover" as a nickname for the COVID-19 virus represents a nadir in modern intergenerational discourse. First appearing on social media in early March 2020, the hashtag #BoomerRemover quickly went viral, particularly on Twitter.59 The phrase was a direct and macabre reference to the virus's higher mortality rate among older populations, framing a deadly pandemic as a grimly convenient solution to the "Boomer problem".52 This expression of extreme ageism did not arise in a vacuum. It was the toxic culmination of the cultural and economic grievances that had been building for years. The context was twofold. First, early and often inaccurate media reports presented COVID-19 as a disease that was a serious threat only to older adults, fostering a dangerous sense of invulnerability among some of the young.52 Second, this narrative landed in a cultural landscape already saturated with youth anger over what was perceived as the Baby Boomer generation's selfishness and myopia, particularly regarding their political choices on climate change, economic inequality, and social welfare systems.49 For a segment of the youth population, the pandemic was seen through a lens of cynical retribution: a generation that had allegedly jeopardized the planet's future was now facing a threat that targeted them specifically. The discourse surrounding #BoomerRemover became a battleground for this "generational warfare".60 Some users wielded the term to express explicit contempt, arguing it was a natural consequence of a generation's political and economic legacy. Others used it more ironically, to highlight the hypocrisy of a society that seemed more outraged by a mean-spirited joke than by the systemic issues that gave rise to it.49 It is crucial to note, however, that this sentiment was far from universal. A significant portion of the online activity using the hashtag was, in fact, condemnatory. Many users, both young and old, employed #BoomerRemover to speak out against ageism, defend older adults, and call for intergenerational solidarity in the face of a shared crisis.52 A content analysis of tweets from the period found that while many were grounded in personal or political ageism, a substantial number used the hashtag to critique its very existence.52 Nevertheless, the fact that such a dehumanizing term could gain any traction at all reveals the profound breakdown in empathy and the depth of the intergenerational divide that the pandemic laid bare.

4.2 The Streets of Europe: Protests Against Economic Exclusion

If "#BoomerRemover" represented a cultural nadir, the mass youth-led protests that swept across Southern Europe in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis were the physical manifestation of generational economic rage. In countries like Spain and Greece, the austerity measures imposed in response to the crisis had a devastating and disproportionate impact on the young. Youth unemployment skyrocketed to catastrophic levels, approaching 45% in both nations.61 This was not merely a recession; it was perceived as a generational lockout. An entire cohort of young, often highly educated individuals found themselves with no jobs, no prospects, and no path to the economic stability their parents had enjoyed. The result was the emergence of the indignados ("the outraged") in Spain and similar movements in Greece, where hundreds of thousands of young people took to the streets and occupied public squares.61 Their anger was directed at a political and economic establishment—dominated by older generations—that they felt had sacrificed their future to protect the interests of banks and existing asset holders. The protests were a raw expression of a generation feeling "locked out of the economy," with their education rendered worthless and their futures foreclosed.61 This theme of economic sacrifice being forced upon the young resurfaced powerfully during the 2023 French pension reform protests. As detailed previously, millions of people, with a strong youth contingent, participated in nationwide strikes and demonstrations to oppose the raising of the retirement age.37 The protests were not just about working two more years; they were about a fundamental sense of injustice. The perception was that a system designed by and for older generations was being propped up on the backs of the young, who were being asked to work longer for a pension they were increasingly convinced they would never receive in full. These events, from the squares of Madrid to the streets of Paris, demonstrate that when economic policies are perceived as being fundamentally biased against the young, the result is not quiet resignation but mass social and political unrest.

Section 5: Blueprints for Solidarity: Global Models of Intergenerational Harmony

While the narrative of generational warfare dominates headlines, it is not a universal condition. Several nations have successfully cultivated social cohesion and mitigated the most severe forms of intergenerational conflict. These countries are not simply culturally predisposed to harmony; their success is the direct result of decades of deliberate, often difficult, state-led policy choices that institutionalize a long-term social contract. By examining the structural mechanisms in the Nordic countries and the proactive social engineering of Singapore, it becomes clear that intergenerational solidarity is an achievable policy outcome.

5.1 The Nordic Consensus: Institutionalizing Equity

The Nordic countries—Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Iceland—are frequently cited for their distinctive welfare model, which combines a free-market economy with a universalist welfare state aimed at promoting social mobility and collective risk-sharing.62 This model, built on high levels of social trust and a willingness to fund public services through taxation, creates a structural buffer against the zero-sum competition that fuels generational conflict elsewhere.64 Two examples stand out as paradigms of institutionalized intergenerational equity. Denmark's Pension System: In stark contrast to the crisis-driven, politically fraught pension debates in France and South Korea, Denmark has implemented a system designed for long-term demographic resilience. Following major reforms in 2006 and 2011, Denmark introduced an automatic indexation mechanism that links the state pension age to increases in life expectancy.32 This policy ensures that as people live longer, the retirement age rises proportionally, with the goal of maintaining a stable period of retirement for each generation (e.g., 14.5 years).32 Changes are decided by Parliament 15 years before they take effect, providing citizens with ample time to plan.32 This approach depoliticizes the process of adjusting the retirement age, transforming it from a contentious biannual fight into a predictable, formula-based adjustment. By ensuring the long-term fiscal sustainability of the system, this policy fosters a sense of fairness, as each generation is expected to contribute in a manner proportional to its own longevity, rather than shifting the burden to the next.67 Norway's Sovereign Wealth Fund: Perhaps the world's most prominent example of intergenerational foresight is Norway's Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG). Established in 1990, the fund was created to manage the revenues from the nation's vast oil and gas resources.68 The core principle of the GPFG is intergenerational equity: the wealth derived from a finite natural resource should not be consumed entirely by the current generation but must be preserved and grown for the benefit of all future generations.69 The government is permitted to spend only the expected real return on the fund's investments (a "bird-in-the-hand" rule, typically around 4%), leaving the principal capital intact to grow over time.68 This effectively separates volatile oil revenues from the annual state budget, preventing boom-and-bust cycles and institutionalizing a culture of long-term savings. The fund, now the largest of its kind in the world, represents a tangible commitment to the future, transforming non-renewable resource wealth into a permanent financial asset for all Norwegians, present and future.70

5.2 The Singaporean Model: Engineering Social Cohesion

If the Nordic model achieves solidarity through consensus and social investment, Singapore provides a compelling example of state-led social engineering designed to proactively foster harmony and preempt conflict. Facing significant ethnic and social challenges at its independence, Singapore's government made social cohesion a central pillar of its national strategy. Housing as a Social Unifier: The cornerstone of this strategy is the Housing and Development Board (HDB). Over 80% of Singapore's population lives in HDB public housing, with homeownership rates exceeding 90%.73 This policy effectively neutralizes the housing affordability crisis that plagues many other developed nations. HDB flats are affordable, high-quality, and located in well-planned towns with integrated amenities like schools, markets, and public transport.75 Critically, the HDB enforces an Ethnic Integration Policy (EIP), which sets racial quotas for each housing block and neighborhood to prevent the formation of ethnic enclaves and promote social mixing.76 By ensuring that citizens of all backgrounds and income levels can afford a home and live together, the HDB system removes a major source of both inter- and intragenerational friction. Promoting Intergenerational Bonding: Beyond housing, Singapore has implemented a suite of national initiatives explicitly designed to strengthen ties between generations. Recognizing the importance of these bonds, the government has launched programs such as: Co-location of Facilities: A plan to build approximately 10 new public housing developments that co-locate eldercare and childcare centers, often sharing common spaces to encourage spontaneous interaction between the very young and the old.77 Inter-generational Learning Programme (ILP): A national program under the National Silver Academy that partners schools with seniors for group learning activities. Students might teach seniors IT skills, while seniors share their life experiences and wisdom with the students. To date, this program has involved over 70 schools and benefited more than 12,000 participants.77 Curriculum Integration: The government is working with the Ministry of Education to incorporate aging-related issues into the national school curriculum, aiming to instill the values of care and respect for seniors from a young age.77

These initiatives, from large-scale urban planning to targeted school programs, demonstrate a comprehensive and proactive approach to building a society where intergenerational contact and mutual support are not left to chance but are actively designed and promoted by the state.78

5.3 Programmatic Solutions and Cultural Factors

While large-scale state policies provide the essential framework for harmony, smaller-scale interventions and cultural factors also play a significant role in mitigating conflict. Programmatic Interventions: There is growing interest globally in intergenerational programs such as co-housing communities, where unrelated people of different ages live in an intentional community with shared spaces, and mentorship schemes that pair older adults with youth.80 These programs aim to foster direct, meaningful contact, which is known to break down stereotypes and build empathy. However, while many such programs report positive anecdotal results, there is a recognized need for more rigorous, evidence-based evaluation to prove their effectiveness and identify best practices for implementation.84 Cultural Counterbalances: In some societies, deep-rooted cultural traditions may act as a counterbalance to modern economic pressures. In East Asian nations like South Korea and Japan, the legacy of Confucianism, with its strong emphasis on filial piety and respect for elders, continues to shape social relations.88 While these traditional values are themselves under strain from rapid modernization and the economic conflicts detailed earlier, they still provide a cultural script that encourages deference to and care for the elderly.90 This does not eliminate conflict, but it may temper its expression and provide a shared ethical framework that is absent in more individualistic societies. Ultimately, the cases of the Nordic countries and Singapore powerfully demonstrate that intergenerational harmony is an engineered outcome. It is the result of long-term vision and deliberate policy choices that prioritize social cohesion and long-term sustainability over short-term political or economic expediency. Their success proves that conflict is not an inevitable result of demographic change, but rather a failure of policy.

Section 6: A Critical Reassessment: Generation War or Class War?

The narrative of a "generation war"—pitting a monolithic bloc of entitled Baby Boomers against a struggling cohort of Millennials and Gen Z—is a compelling and pervasive one. It offers a simple, emotionally resonant explanation for the economic anxieties of the young. However, this framing, while capturing an element of the truth, functions as a powerful form of misdirection. A deeper analysis reveals that the primary driver of inequality is not a horizontal conflict between generations, but a vertical one between economic classes that cuts across all age groups.

6.1 Problematizing the "Generational War" Narrative

The "generation war" narrative conveniently diverts attention from the most significant economic trend of the last four decades: a massive upward redistribution of wealth from labor to capital, and from the bottom 99% to the top 1%.92 Focusing on the cost of Social Security and Medicare for seniors as the primary burden on the young is a profound misreading of the economic landscape. The hit to the lifetime earnings of a typical young worker from this upward redistribution is vastly larger than the cost of funding their parents' retirement benefits.92 For example, since 1979, worker productivity in the U.S. has grown by over 60%, while the hourly pay of a typical worker has risen by only about 6%.92 This enormous gap represents wealth that has been captured not by "Boomers" as a whole, but by corporate executives, shareholders, and the financial elite—a group that includes members of every generation. The narrative that blames retired school teachers and retail clerks for the economic precarity of the young obscures the role of policies—such as deregulation, the weakening of unions, and tax cuts for the wealthy—that have benefited the top of the income distribution at the expense of everyone else, regardless of age.93

6.2 Intragenerational Inequality: The Divide Within

The idea of a unified generational experience collapses under scrutiny. Both the Boomer and Millennial cohorts are riven by profound internal inequalities, making broad generalizations about either group misleading. The Boomer Divide: The stereotype of the universally affluent "greedy geezer" is a caricature that ignores the economic reality for millions of older adults. While the Boomer generation is the wealthiest in aggregate, this wealth is highly concentrated. A significant portion of this generation faces profound economic insecurity. Many have insufficient retirement savings, with one study finding that 26% of Boomers have less than $50,000 saved for retirement, and 10% have nothing saved at all.95 They are vulnerable to the escalating costs of healthcare and long-term care, and many rely heavily on Social Security for their income.96 A low-income Boomer struggling to pay rent has far more in common with a struggling Millennial renter than with a multi-millionaire member of their own generation. The Millennial Divide: Similarly, the Millennial generation is not a uniformly struggling mass. It is the most racially diverse and highly educated generation in history, but its economic outcomes are fractured along class, race, and educational lines.14 The wealth gap within the Millennial generation is already vast and growing. The wealthiest top 10% of Millennials now hold, on average, 20% more wealth than their Baby Boomer counterparts did at the same age.101 Meanwhile, the majority of the generation grapples with student debt, unaffordable housing, and stagnant wages.15 This has been described not as a generation war, but as a "new class war" taking place within the Millennial cohort, a divide that the "Great Wealth Transfer" is set to exacerbate dramatically.101

6.3 Re-centering the Conflict on Class

When the data is disaggregated, it becomes clear that the true conflict is not primarily generational but structural. The key determinant of economic well-being is not the year one was born, but one's position in the class structure. The political class of the last 40 years, which has been disproportionately composed of Baby Boomers, has enacted policies that have systematically benefited the asset-owning class at the expense of the wage-earning class.94 These policies—such as financial deregulation, which fueled asset bubbles that enriched homeowners and investors, and anti-labor policies that suppressed wage growth—have had cross-generational effects. They have benefited wealthy Boomers, wealthy Gen Xers, and are now creating a new class of wealthy Millennials. Simultaneously, they have harmed working-class Boomers who lost manufacturing jobs, working-class Gen Xers who faced a shrinking social safety net, and working-class Millennials who entered a precarious labor market.24 The "generational war" narrative is therefore a powerful and politically convenient tool of misdirection. It channels the legitimate economic anger of the young towards a broad, diffuse, and internally divided target—all older people—while obscuring the role of the economic elite and the class-based policies that are the primary drivers of inequality for the majority of people in all generations. It encourages the 99% to fight amongst themselves based on age, rather than uniting to challenge the economic structures created by and for the 1%.

Conclusion: Forging an Intergenerational Contract for the Future

The global rise of intergenerational tension, expressed in everything from dismissive memes to mass street protests, is one of the defining social phenomena of our time. This report has demonstrated that these conflicts are not an inevitable byproduct of demographic change or a simple clash of cultural tastes. They are, instead, the predictable and painful outcome of a series of economic and political choices made over the past half-century that have systematically eroded the social contract between generations. The drivers of this great divide are primarily economic—rooted in wealth disparity, housing unaffordability, and unsustainable social security systems. The expressions are cultural, amplified by the polarizing dynamics of social media. And the solutions, therefore, must be political. A central finding of this analysis is that a singular focus on the "generational" lens is insufficient and often misleading. While real economic divergences exist between age cohorts, the narrative of a "generation war" obscures the more profound reality of a class war. The vast economic inequalities within both the Baby Boomer and Millennial generations reveal that the true lines of conflict are vertical, not horizontal. The policies that have created widespread precarity for the young have also left millions of older adults economically insecure, while simultaneously enriching an elite class that spans all age groups. To move from conflict to solidarity, a new, explicit intergenerational social contract is required. The successful models of harmony in the Nordic countries and Singapore provide a clear blueprint. This is not a call for a single, one-size-fits-all solution, but for a framework of principles grounded in long-term stewardship and mutual obligation. Key pillars of such a contract would include: Long-Term Stewardship of Resources: Nations must adopt policies that treat national wealth—be it from natural resources or economic growth—as a shared inheritance. The establishment of sovereign wealth funds, modeled on Norway's GPFG, institutionalizes the principle that the current generation is a steward for the future, not merely a consumer of the present.69 Sustainable and Fair Social Security: Pension and healthcare systems must be reformed to be demographically resilient and equitable. This requires moving away from short-term political fixes and toward predictable, long-term mechanisms, such as automatically linking the retirement age to gains in life expectancy, as pioneered by Denmark.32 Housing as a Social Good: The hyper-financialization of housing must be countered with robust state intervention to ensure affordability. Large-scale public or social housing programs, as demonstrated by Singapore and Vienna, can de-commodify a basic human need and prevent the housing market from becoming a primary engine of intergenerational inequality.75 Equitable Taxation for Social Investment: To fund these initiatives and address the root causes of inequality, the tax burden must shift. A greater emphasis on taxing wealth, particularly large inheritances and estates, can curb the formation of dynastic wealth that exacerbates both inter- and intragenerational divides, while providing the revenue needed for investments in education, healthcare, and infrastructure that benefit all generations.103 Proactive Social Integration: Beyond economic policy, societies must actively invest in fostering direct, meaningful contact between generations. Co-locating eldercare and childcare, integrating aging-related topics into school curricula, and supporting community-based intergenerational programs can help rebuild the empathy and mutual understanding that have been eroded by social and digital segregation.77 Ultimately, the challenge facing nations across the globe is not to determine a "winner" in a supposed war between generations. It is to recognize that such a war has no victors. The true task is to rebuild a society where each generation understands that its own security, prosperity, and well-being are inextricably linked to the well-being of those who came before and those who will come after. Forging this new social contract is the great political and ethical imperative of the 21st century. 참고 자료 OK boomer - Wikipedia, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OK_boomer What does "ok, boomer" mean? | Social media definitions - SocialBee, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://socialbee.com/glossary/ok-boomer/ Generation gap - Wikipedia, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_gap Generation Gap: What It Is and Why It's Important to Business - Investopedia, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/generation-gap.asp journalofethics.ama-assn.org, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/ageism-source-global-mental-health-inequity/2023-10#:~:text=More%20than%2050%20years%20ago,1 Ageism as a Source of Global Mental Health Inequity - AMA Journal of Ethics, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/ageism-source-global-mental-health-inequity/2023-10 Ageing: Ageism - World Health Organization (WHO), 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/ageing-ageism Ageism - World Health Organization (WHO), 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.who.int/health-topics/ageism Taking a closer look at ageism: self- and other-directed ageist attitudes and discrimination, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5550624/ Theory of generations - Wikipedia, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_generations How to Explain the Millennial Generation? Understand the Context - Inquiries Journal, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/878/how-to-explain-the-millennial-generation-understand-the-context Coming Up for Air: Exploring an Intergenerational Perspective on Social Work - PMC, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4985731/ 252. The Theory of Generations - YouTube, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ot5xdqdho4Y The wealth of generations, with special attention to the millennials - Brookings Institution, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-wealth-of-generations-with-special-attention-to-the-millennials/ Information on the Economic Status of Millennial Households Compared to Previous Generations | U.S. GAO, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-20-194 Intergenerational equity - Wikipedia, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intergenerational_equity Intergenerational and intragenerational mobility social mobility (video) - Khan Academy, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/social-inequality/social-class/v/intergenerational-and-intragenerational-mobility-social-mobility What's The Difference Between Intergenerational And Intragenerational Mobility? - YouTube, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLmmWXKeIqs Rethinking Inter-Generational Inequality | Cairn.info, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-francaise-de-sociologie-2013-4-page-641?lang=en Intragenerational VS Intergenerational Equity: what is it and why we should care., 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.earthtohumankind.com/intragenerational-vs-intergenerational-equity-what-is-it-and-why-we-should-care/ Intragenerational inequality aversion and intergenerational equity - EconStor, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/250897/1/MartinetDelCampoCairns-2022-accepted_manuscript-EER.pdf Wealth Distribution in the U.S. By Generation - SmartAsset.com, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://smartasset.com/financial-advisor/wealth-by-generation How big is the generational wealth gap in America? - Self Credit Builder, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.self.inc/info/generational-wealth-gap/ How the American dream turned into greed and inequality - The World Economic Forum, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2017/11/the-pursuit-of-happiness-how-the-american-dream-turned-into-greed-and-inequality/ The Fed - Are Millennials Different? - Federal Reserve Board, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/feds/are-millennials-different.htm The Great Wealth Transfer: Boomers to Millennials and Gen Z - Barnum Financial Group, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://barnumfinancialgroup.com/the-great-wealth-transfer-boomers-to-millennials-and-gen-z/ Bridging the Gap: How Generational Wealth Transfer Impacts the Future, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://suddenwealthprotectionlaw.com/generational-wealth-transfer/ The Great Wealth Transfer and its Implications for the American Economy, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/mje/2025/04/03/the-great-wealth-transfer-and-its-implications-for-the-american-economy/ Millennials are set for an 'inheritance boom' but it won't solve their home ownership and inequality woes - Resolution Foundation, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/press-releases/millennials-are-set-for-an-inheritance-boom-but-it-wont-solve-their-home-ownership-and-inequality-woes/ The 2023 France Pension Reform - Intereconomics, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.intereconomics.eu/contents/year/2023/number/3/article/the-2023-france-pension-reform.html Korea's National Pension: Structural Reform Measures - KDI - Korea Development Institute - RESEARCH - KDI FOCUS, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://kdi.re.kr/eng/research/focusView?pub_no=18361 Pension Projection Exercise 2021 Country Fiche Denmark - Economy and Finance, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-05/dk_-_ar_2021_final_pension_fiche.pdf Pension notes - FIAP, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.fiapinternacional.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/NP-86-ING-act3-1.pdf The Chilean pension withdrawals and the 2025 reform: Fiscal and retirement consequences, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-pension-economics-and-finance/article/chilean-pension-withdrawals-and-the-2025-reform-fiscal-and-retirement-consequences/ADAA0903863A29C2DED67EDFC4306770 Securing Our Future: Why the National Pension Matters Now - The Argus, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.theargus.org/news/articleView.html?idxno=3031 S. Korea's National Pension System reformed so that workers will pay more to get more, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXo_BUaU9DI 2023 French pension reform strikes - Wikipedia, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_French_pension_reform_strikes 'Generation Rent' and Intergenerational Relations in The Era of Housing Financialisation, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.housing-critical.com/data/USR_057_DEFAULT/02_Generation_Rent_and_Intergenerational_Relations_in_The_Era_of_Housing_Financialisation.pdf Housing and Intergenerational Fairness | Policy Exchange, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://policyexchange.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/housing-and-intergenerational-fairness.pdf (PDF) Emerging Patterns of Intergenerational Inequality in the Housing Market: The Shifting Position of Younger People in Cities in Europe and East Asia - ResearchGate, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268085727_Emerging_Patterns_of_Intergenerational_Inequality_in_the_Housing_Market_The_Shifting_Position_of_Younger_People_in_Cities_in_Europe_and_East_Asia The Long-Term Outlook for Health Care Spending - Congressional Budget Office, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/ftpdocs/87xx/doc8758/maintext.3.1.shtml Retiree migration and intergenerational conflict - IZA World of Labor, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://wol.iza.org/articles/retiree-migration-and-intergenerational-conflict/long Intergenerational Aspects of Health Care - Federal Reserve Board, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200938/200938pap.pdf The effect of population aging on health expenditure growth: a critical review - PMC, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5549212/ Address sustainability risks in health insurance funds: generational actuarial balance and intergenerational equity perspective - Frontiers, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1641233/full What Does 'Ok Boomer' Mean? And Where Does It Come From? - Jeff Butler, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://jeffjbutler.com/what-does-ok-boomer-mean-and-where-does-it-come-from/ "OK Boomer" : Why Language Matters in the Fight for Social Justice - Dana Sayre, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.danasayre.com/ok-boomer-language-matters-in-social-justic/ Ok Boomer - Lark, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.larksuite.com/en_us/topics/genz-workplace-glossary/ok-boomer COVID-19 a 'boomer remover' — Why millennials are angry and done with older generation, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://theprint.in/opinion/pov/covid-19-a-boomer-remover-why-millennials-are-angry-and-done-with-older-generation/381223/ Social media is fueling a public health crisis for children and teens. Experts say accountability is overdue. - Johns Hopkins in Washington, D.C., 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://washingtondc.jhu.edu/news/social-media-mental-health-policy/ "A Toxic Trend?": Generational Conflict and Connectivity in Twitter Discourse Under the #BoomerRemover Hashtag - PubMed, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33159524/ #BoomerRemover: COVID-19, ageism, and the intergenerational twitter response, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350511084_BoomerRemover_COVID-19_ageism_and_the_intergenerational_twitter_response The growing intergenerational nature of social media | Institute for Public Health, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://publichealth.wustl.edu/the-growing-intergenerational-nature-of-social-media/ How Britain voted at the EU referendum - YouGov, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/15796-how-britain-voted 47th Edition - Spring 2024 | The Institute of Politics at Harvard University, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://iop.harvard.edu/youth-poll/47th-edition-spring-2024 If you must be a poll junkie, be wary: The case of the youth vote | Brookings, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/if-you-must-be-a-poll-junkie-be-wary-the-case-of-the-youth-vote/ Brexit vote explained: poverty, low skills and lack of opportunities, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.jrf.org.uk/public-attitudes/brexit-vote-explained-poverty-low-skills-and-lack-of-opportunities Political Perspectives | The Political Impact of the UK's Ageing Population - the University of Manchester WordPress Websites & Blogs, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://sites.manchester.ac.uk/political-perspectives/2023/02/17/political-impact-of-uk-ageing-population/ #BoomerRemover: COVID-19, ageism, and the intergenerational twitter response - PMC, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9758966/ What Is 'Boomer Remover' and Why Is It Making People So Angry? - Newsweek, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.newsweek.com/boomer-remover-meme-trends-virus-coronavirus-social-media-covid-19-baby-boomers-1492190 Dimensions of the global youth revolt | International Socialist Review, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://isreview.org/issue/81/dimensions-global-youth-revolt/index.html Nordic model - Wikipedia, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_model The Nordic Welfare Model in the Wake of Post-WWII Transformations and Algorithms of Changing Social Policy - Athens Journal, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.athensjournals.gr/social/2019-6-3-1-Backman.pdf Social policy and welfare | Nordic cooperation, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.norden.org/en/information/social-policy-and-welfare The Nordic Model: Capable of Responding to the Social Side of Crises and Sustaining Social Investment? - Intereconomics, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.intereconomics.eu/contents/year/2023/number/5/article/the-nordic-model-capable-of-responding-to-the-social-side-of-crises-and-sustaining-social-investment.html Guest Comment: Denmark's pension dilemma, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.europeanpensions.net/ep/Guest-Comment-Denmark-pension-dilemma.php Polishing Denmark's world-class pension system - Rangvid's Blog, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://blog.rangvid.com/2025/06/09/polishing-denmarks-world-class-pension-system/ CHAPTER 6 The Economics of Sovereign Wealth Funds: Lessons from Norway in: Beyond the Curse - IMF eLibrary, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.elibrary.imf.org/display/book/9781616351458/ch006.xml The Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG) in Norway - Centre for Public Impact, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://centreforpublicimpact.org/public-impact-fundamentals/the-government-pension-fund-global-gpfg-in-norway/ The Norwegian Oil Fund in a Warming World: What are the Interests of Future Generations?, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21550085.2021.1940451 The Government Pension Fund - regjeringen.no, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.regjeringen.no/en/topics/the-economy/the-government-pension-fund/id1441/ Intergenerational Equity, the Public Trust Doctrine, Norway and North Sea Oil, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/102856.html Housing a Nation – The HDB Story - UN-Habitat, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://mirror.unhabitat.org/downloads/docs/9118_91744_HousingAndDevelopmentBoard_Singapore.pdf Public Housing In Singapore: A Success Story In Sustainable Development - NUS Law, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://law.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/014_2020_LyeLinHeng.pdf Building a Cohesive Society: The Case of Singapore's Housing Policies - Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI), 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.cigionline.org/static/documents/documents/PB%20no.128web.pdf HDB: Understanding Singapore's Public Housing Model | by Luthfiyyah Damayani - Medium, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://luthfiyyahdamayani.medium.com/hdb-understanding-singapores-public-housing-model-34478302d78f Efforts to boost inter-generational harmony - Ministry of Health, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.moh.gov.sg/newsroom/efforts-to-boost-inter-generational-harmony Promoting intergenerational understanding between the young and old: the case of Singapore Leng Leng Thang, National University, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/family/docs/egm11/EGM_Expert_Paper_Theng_Leng_Leng.pdf Intergenerational Guide for the Community Care and Early Childhood Sectors | AIC, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.aic.sg/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Bridging-Generations-Intergenerational-Guide-for-the-Community-Care-and-Early-Childhood-Sectors.pdf 5 Step Guide for Successful Mentorship Programs - Chronus, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://chronus.com/how-to-start-a-mentoring-program Cohousing Assn of the US: Senior Cohousing, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.cohousing.org/senior-cohousing/ Beyond Contact-Intergenerational Living in Cohousing Communities, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://aese.psu.edu/outreach/intergenerational/articles/intergenerational-contact-zones/residential-cohousing-communities Cohousing Community: The Future of Housing - Downers Grove Rehab & Nursing, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.downersgrovehc.com/blog/cohousing-community Evaluating - Sharing Our Space, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, http://www.sharingourspace.org/evaluating/ Intergenerational Programs: Evidence and Outcomes - Bronfenbrenner Center for Translational Research, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.bctr.cornell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Systemic-Translational-Review-intergenerational-programs.pdf Intergenerational Programmes Evaluation - Generations Working Together, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://generationsworkingtogether.org/downloads/5841b1a4032fa-Intergenerational%20Programmes%20Evaluation.pdf A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Intergenerational Programs - PMC, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5663734/ Korean Confucianism - Wikipedia, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_Confucianism Ancient Chinese Philosophy in Korea: Implied Influences of Confucianism in Contemporary Korea and the Korean Idealistic Alteration | International Journal of Asian Social Science Research - Zeus Press, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://journals.zeuspress.org/index.php/ijassr/article/view/33 Rational Rendering of Confucian Relationships in Contemporary Korea - ResearchGate, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265032196_Rational_Rendering_of_Confucian_Relationships_in_Contemporary_Korea How Does Confucianism Influence Health Behaviors, Health Outcomes and Medical Decisions? A Scoping Review - PubMed Central, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9314298/ Dean Baker | Diverting Class Warfare Into Generational Warfare - Truthout, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://truthout.org/articles/diverting-class-warfare-into-generational-warfare/ Diverting Class Warfare into Generational Warfare - CEPR.net, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://cepr.net/diverting-class-warfare-into-generational-warfare/ CMV: Boomer's have compromised America's future more than any other generation. : r/changemyview - Reddit, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/1mkeeaa/cmv_boomers_have_compromised_americas_future_more/ Are We in a Baby Boomer Retirement Crisis? - Investopedia, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/032216/are-we-baby-boomer-retirement-crisis.asp Baby Boomers Have Never Been So Wealthy, Yet Many Aren't Feeling the Booming Economy. Here's Why., 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://247wallst.com/personal-finance/2025/01/18/baby-boomers-have-never-been-so-wealthy-yet-many-arent-feeling-the-booming-economy-heres-why/ Retirement of Baby Boomers Is Unlikely to Precipitate Dramatic Decline in Market Returns, but B - GAO, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-06-718.pdf The 2030 Problem: Caring for Aging Baby Boomers - PMC, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1464018/ 15 ECONOMIC FACTS ABOUT MILLENNIALS - Obama White House Archives, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/millennials_report.pdf The millennial generation: A demographic bridge to America's diverse future | Brookings, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/millennials/ To Best Understand Inequality, Think Class, Not Generation, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://inequality.org/article/to-best-understand-inequality-think-class-not-generation/ Green Social Housing: Lessons from Vienna - Climate and Community Institute, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://climateandcommunity.org/research/vienna-green-social-housing/ Inheritance Taxation in OECD Countries, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/inheritance-taxation-in-oecd-countries_e2879a7d-en.html Follow the money: Tax inheritances, not estates - Brookings Institution, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/follow-the-money-tax-inheritances-not-estates/ Taxation and Intergenerational Fairness: Exploring the Role of Inheritance Taxes with a Focus on Ireland | Social Policy and Society - Cambridge University Press, 8월 10, 2025에 액세스, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/social-policy-and-society/article/taxation-and-intergenerational-fairness-exploring-the-role-of-inheritance-taxes-with-a-focus-on-ireland/B27BD0AF592D852EB771334AD891DADE