Deep Research Archives

The Dichotomy of Diptera: An Analysis of Flies as Pests and Pillars of the Ecosystem

Section 1: The Scientific Case for Flies as Harmful Pests

The designation of certain fly species as "pests" is not an arbitrary human classification but a scientifically grounded assessment of their biology, behavior, and profound impact on human and animal health. This status is a direct consequence of an evolutionary strategy that has made them extraordinarily successful organisms, but which, in proximity to human civilization, transforms them into highly efficient vectors of disease. Species commonly referred to as "filth flies," such as the house fly (Musca domestica), have evolved to thrive in environments rich in decaying organic matter—environments that are also teeming with pathogenic microorganisms.1 When human activities, such as agriculture and urbanization, create an overabundance of these resources (e.g., manure, garbage) and bring them into close contact with human populations, the fly's natural life cycle becomes a potent mechanism for pathogen dissemination. Their very adaptations for survival—their physical structure, feeding habits, and reproductive strategies—make them formidable threats to public health. This section will deconstruct the scientific basis for their pest status, examining the precise mechanisms of disease transmission, the catalogue of pathogens they carry, and the specific roles of key pest species.

1.1. Mechanisms of Pathogen Transmission: The Fly as a Biological Syringe and Mobile Contaminant

Flies employ several highly effective methods to transfer pathogens from contaminated sources to humans, animals, and their food. These mechanisms can be broadly categorized as mechanical transmission, which is the most common route, and biological transmission, where the pathogen may persist or even replicate within the fly.

Mechanical Transmission

Mechanical transmission is the passive, unintentional transfer of pathogens from one location to another, with the fly acting as a contaminated vehicle.4 The fly's anatomy and behavior are exquisitely adapted for this role. Morphological Adaptations for Contamination: The body of a fly is structurally optimized for acquiring and transporting microbes. Its entire exoskeleton is covered in a profusion of fine hairs, known as setae, and its feet (tarsi) are equipped with sticky pads that readily adhere to microscopic particles, including bacteria, viruses, and parasite cysts from the surfaces on which it lands.5 The fly's mouthparts, a sponge-like proboscis, also directly collect contaminants during feeding.5 Studies have quantified this capacity, finding that a single house fly can carry as many as 4 million bacteria on its body surface and over 28 million in its stomach.9 Behavioral Facilitation of Transmission: The primary driver of mechanical transmission is the fly's "filth-to-food" behavior. Flies are naturally attracted to, feed upon, and lay their eggs in highly contaminated materials such as animal feces, human excrement, rotting carcasses, and garbage.1 In these environments, they inevitably acquire a heavy load of pathogenic microorganisms. Because they are also attracted to human food for sustenance, their frequent movement between these filth sources and human kitchens, dining tables, and food processing facilities creates a direct and efficient pathway for contamination.4 Regurgitation and Defecation: A critical and often overlooked mechanism of transmission is the fly's unique feeding process. Lacking teeth to chew solid food, a house fly must first liquefy its meal by regurgitating a droplet of digestive enzymes and saliva—its "vomit"—onto the food surface.7 This regurgitated fluid may contain pathogens that the fly has recently ingested and stored in its crop (a food storage organ). After liquefying the food, the fly sucks up the resulting slurry. This process of regurgitation directly deposits a concentrated inoculum of pathogens onto food intended for human consumption. Concurrently, flies defecate with remarkable frequency, often while feeding, leaving behind small fecal spots ("fly specks") that can also be laden with viable pathogens from their digestive tract.7 Experimental studies have quantified the efficiency of this transfer; for example, a single fly landing on a surface after visiting a contaminated food source can deposit a significant bacterial load, with one study measuring an average transfer of 3.5 log10 Colony Forming Units (CFU) of E. coli per landing.14

Biological Transmission and Pathogen Persistence

Beyond simply carrying pathogens on their exterior, flies can also serve as internal reservoirs, a process that blurs the line between mechanical and biological transmission. Many ingested pathogens are not immediately destroyed by the fly's digestive system. Pathogen Viability in the Fly Gut: A substantial body of research confirms that numerous human and animal pathogens can survive and persist within the fly's alimentary canal for extended periods. The duration of viability varies by pathogen but can range from several hours to over a month.15 For instance, E. coli O157:H7 can be excreted in fly feces for up to three days after ingestion and can survive on the fly's cuticle for as long as 13 days.17 Similarly, Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been shown to remain viable and motile throughout the fly's gut for at least 24 hours.18 This persistence means that a single contaminated meal can enable a fly to continuously shed pathogens through its feces and vomit over a significant portion of its lifespan, greatly increasing its window of infectivity. "Bio-enhanced Transmission": Some research suggests that flies are more than just passive carriers; they can act as mobile incubators that amplify the pathogenic threat. This concept, termed "bio-enhanced transmission," posits that flies can provide a hospitable environment for certain bacteria to multiply, either on their body surfaces or within their regurgitated vomit spots.17 For example, studies have shown that E. coli O157:H7 can survive and multiply within the regurgitation spots deposited by flies on plant leaves. This implies that the fly's vomit spot serves as a nutrient-rich microenvironment that protects the bacteria and allows their population to grow, increasing the infectious dose available for subsequent transmission.17 This elevates the fly from a simple courier to an active disseminator that can augment the microbial risk in the environment.

1.2. A Catalogue of Fly-Borne Pathogens

The close association of filth flies with human and animal waste grants them access to an astonishingly broad spectrum of pathogens. Scientific reviews have implicated flies in the mechanical and biological transmission of more than 130 different pathogenic organisms affecting humans and animals.1 This diverse catalogue underscores the multifaceted nature of the public health threat they represent. Pathogen Type Specific Pathogen (Examples) Associated Disease(s) Primary Fly Vector(s) Bacteria Salmonella enterica Salmonellosis, Typhoid Fever Musca domestica

Shigella spp. Shigellosis (Bacillary Dysentery) Musca domestica

Escherichia coli (e.g., O157:H7) Gastroenteritis, Hemorrhagic Colitis Musca domestica

Vibrio cholerae Cholera Musca domestica

Campylobacter spp. Campylobacteriosis Musca domestica

Bacillus anthracis Anthrax Musca domestica, Calliphoridae

Staphylococcus aureus Food Poisoning, Skin Infections, Mastitis Musca domestica, Haematobia irritans

Anaplasma marginale Bovine Anaplasmosis Stomoxys calcitrans Viruses Rotavirus, Norovirus Viral Gastroenteritis (Diarrhea) Musca domestica

Poliovirus Poliomyelitis Musca domestica

Hepatitis A Virus Hepatitis A Musca domestica

Equine Infectious Anemia Virus Equine Infectious Anemia Stomoxys calcitrans

African Swine Fever Virus African Swine Fever Stomoxys calcitrans Protozoa Entamoeba histolytica Amoebiasis (Amoebic Dysentery) Musca domestica

Giardia lamblia Giardiasis Musca domestica

Cryptosporidium spp. Cryptosporidiosis Musca domestica

Trypanosoma evansi Surra (in animals) Stomoxys calcitrans Helminths Ascaris lumbricoides (Roundworm) Ascariasis Musca domestica

Trichuris trichiura (Whipworm) Trichuriasis Musca domestica

Taenia spp. (Tapeworm) Taeniasis Musca domestica

Enterobius vermicularis (Pinworm) Enterobiasis Musca domestica

Table 1: A summary of major pathogens transmitted by synanthropic flies, the diseases they cause, and the primary fly species implicated as vectors. This list is not exhaustive but represents the most significant public health threats. 1 An emerging and particularly alarming threat is the role of flies in disseminating antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Flies collected from agricultural environments with high antibiotic use, such as dairy farms and poultry houses, as well as from hospital settings, have been found to carry bacteria resistant to multiple classes of antibiotics.11 Because flies are highly mobile, they can act as environmental shuttles, transferring AMR genes from these reservoirs to the wider community. This transforms them from vectors of disease into vectors of potentially untreatable disease, amplifying one of the most critical global health crises of the 21st century.

1.3. The Vectorial Capacity of Key Fly Species

While thousands of fly species exist, a few have a disproportionate impact on human and animal health due to their synanthropic (closely associated with humans) or parasitic nature. The House Fly (Musca domestica): The house fly is the quintessential filth fly and arguably the most significant mechanical vector of disease globally. Its life cycle is inextricably linked to the decaying organic waste produced by human activities, from household garbage to livestock manure.1 This close association ensures constant exposure to a rich soup of enteric pathogens. Its high reproductive capacity and short generation time allow its populations to explode under favorable conditions, amplifying its potential for disease transmission.2 It is the primary vector for a vast array of the bacterial, viral, and parasitic diseases listed in Table 1. The Stable Fly (Stomoxys calcitrans): Unlike the house fly, the stable fly is a hematophagous (blood-feeding) insect, equipped with a piercing proboscis used to take blood meals from livestock, companion animals, and occasionally humans.21 This feeding behavior makes it an exceptionally efficient mechanical vector for blood-borne pathogens. An interrupted feeding on an infected animal can lead to immediate transmission when the fly moves to a new host to complete its meal. It is a primary vector of economically devastating livestock diseases such as Bovine Anaplasmosis, Equine Infectious Anemia, and African Swine Fever.21 Furthermore, its painful, persistent bites cause significant stress to animals, leading to defensive behaviors that reduce feeding time and decrease productivity.31 Blow Flies (Calliphoridae): Blow flies are best known for their role as primary decomposers of carrion, a critical ecological function that is also central to the field of forensic entomology.33 However, this attraction to dead and decaying tissue also makes them potent disease vectors. They are known to transmit the spores of Bacillus anthracis after visiting the carcasses of animals that have died from anthrax.5 Certain species are also responsible for myiasis, the infestation of living tissue in animals and humans, where larvae feed on flesh, causing severe injury and secondary infections.4

Section 2: Quantifying the Damage: The Public Health and Economic Burden

The vectorial capacity of flies translates into tangible and severe consequences for societies worldwide. These impacts can be quantified in terms of public health outcomes, particularly the burden of infectious disease, and direct economic losses to critical industries like agriculture and food service. The density of pest fly populations often serves as a direct and visible indicator of underlying systemic failures in sanitation, waste management, and public health infrastructure. A high fly count is not merely a nuisance; it is a symptom of a larger, more dangerous problem.

2.1. Impact on Public Health: A Tale of Two Worlds

The global health burden of fly-borne diseases is immense, though it is not evenly distributed. Vector-borne diseases collectively account for over 17% of all infectious diseases, leading to more than 700,000 deaths each year, with the highest impact felt in tropical and subtropical regions.35 Disparity between Developing and Developed Nations: There is a stark contrast in the primary public health impact of flies between developing and developed nations, a difference rooted in sanitation and infrastructure. In Developing Regions: In communities with inadequate sanitation, lack of access to clean water, and practices like open defecation, flies are primary drivers of enteric and diarrheal diseases. These illnesses are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, especially among children under five.36 A longitudinal cohort study in Vellore, India, established a direct and statistically significant link between high fly densities in households and an increased risk of diarrheal episodes in children. The study found that fly abundance was six times higher in rural sites compared to urban ones and was significantly associated with garbage disposal near the home and the absence of latrines. Critically, 72% of the flies captured in the study tested positive for enteric pathogens, including Norovirus (50%) and Salmonella spp. (46.7%), demonstrating their role as active vectors in the community.38 In Developed Nations: In countries with robust sanitation infrastructure, widespread fly-borne epidemics like cholera or typhoid are rare. The public health risk shifts from community-wide transmission to more localized foodborne illness outbreaks originating from contamination within the modern food supply chain.40 A lapse in sanitation at a farm, processing plant, or restaurant can allow flies to introduce pathogens like E. coli O157:H7 or Salmonella into food products, potentially leading to multi-state outbreaks. Nosocomial Infections and Community Health: Hospitals and other healthcare facilities can become hotspots for fly-associated disease transmission. Flies are attracted to clinical waste and other organic materials, where they can acquire pathogens, including highly virulent and antibiotic-resistant strains. Studies that have captured flies in and around hospitals have confirmed their contamination with a high load of pathogenic bacteria.20 Their ability to move freely between hospital grounds and nearby residential areas creates a dangerous bridge, facilitating the dissemination of nosocomial pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes into the broader community.

2.2. Economic Consequences for Livestock and Agriculture

The economic toll of pest flies on the agricultural sector is staggering. In the United States alone, the annual cost to the cattle industry is estimated to be between $1 billion and $6 billion.31 This figure encompasses direct production losses, the cost of veterinary treatments for fly-borne diseases, and expenditures on control measures. The economic impact of flies is not linear but often exponential; a small, unmanaged population can reproduce with incredible speed, quickly surpassing a critical threshold where its impact on livestock triggers disproportionately large financial losses. Fly Species Affected Livestock Sector Mechanism of Loss Estimated Annual Cost (U.S.) Stable Fly (Stomoxys calcitrans) Dairy Reduced milk production, stress $360 million

Cow-Calf Reduced calf weight gain, stress $358 million

Pastured Stockers Reduced weight gain, altered grazing $1,268 million

Feeder Cattle Reduced weight gain, feed efficiency $226 million

Total (Stable Fly)

~$2.212 billion Horn Fly (Haematobia irritans) Pasture Cattle (Beef & Dairy) Blood loss, stress, reduced weight gain, reduced milk production

$1 billion All Pest Flies (Combined) All Cattle Sectors Production loss, disease treatment, control costs Up to $6 billion

Table 2: Estimated annual economic impact of key pest flies on U.S. cattle industries, based on 2009-dollar valuations and subsequent industry reports. The economic impact of stable flies alone was estimated at over $2.2 billion, with horn flies adding at least another $1 billion in losses. 31 Mechanisms of Loss in Cattle: The financial damage is inflicted through several interconnected mechanisms: Reduced Productivity from Stress and Biting: The constant irritation from biting flies like the stable fly and blood-feeding flies like the horn fly causes significant stress. A single horn fly can take 20-30 blood meals per day.44 This relentless attack forces cattle to expend energy on defensive behaviors such as head tossing, tail switching, and bunching together, rather than grazing.32 This altered behavior directly leads to reduced feed intake and lower feed efficiency, resulting in significant production losses. Research has documented average daily weight gain reductions of up to 0.44 lbs in pastured cattle due to stable flies and milk production losses of up to 0.5 liters per day in dairy cows.48 Economic Injury Level (EIL): To manage these losses, entomologists use the concept of an Economic Injury Level (EIL)—the pest density at which the cost of control measures is equal to the value of the production loss that would be prevented. For horn flies on beef cattle, the EIL is widely accepted to be around 200 flies per animal.44 Beyond this threshold, the economic losses from reduced weight gain and stress begin to outweigh the cost of treatment. For the intensely painful stable fly, the EIL is much lower, estimated at just four to five flies per leg.50 Disease Transmission Costs: Flies are vectors for numerous costly livestock diseases. Face flies are known to transmit Moraxella bovis, the bacterium that causes infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis, or "pinkeye," a painful condition that can lead to blindness and significantly reduced weight gain in calves.44 Horn flies, which often feed on the udders of cows, can mechanically transmit Staphylococcus aureus, a primary cause of mastitis.44 Stable flies are also vectors for diseases like Bovine Anaplasmosis, which can cause severe anemia, death, and result in trade restrictions.24 The costs associated with veterinary care, medication, and lost production from these diseases add another substantial layer to the economic burden.

2.3. Risks to the Food Service and Processing Industries

In the food service and processing industries, the presence of flies is a critical failure of food safety protocols. The economic risks are multifaceted, encompassing direct contamination, regulatory penalties, and severe reputational damage. Contamination and Food Safety: A single house fly can carry millions of bacteria on its body and tens of millions more internally, making it a potent source of contamination.9 They can transfer pathogenic bacteria like E. coli and Salmonella from a contaminated source to ready-to-eat food or a sanitized food-preparation surface within seconds of landing.53 The presence of any flies, particularly small flies like fruit flies, is a direct indicator of underlying sanitation deficiencies, such as rotting produce, dirty drains, or inadequate waste management, which are themselves food safety hazards.54 Regulatory and Reputational Risks: Food safety regulations are stringent, and the presence of flies can lead to immediate and severe consequences. Health inspectors may issue fines, demand corrective actions, or, in cases of severe infestation, order a temporary shutdown of the facility.54 Beyond regulatory action, the reputational damage from a fly infestation can be catastrophic and long-lasting. In the digital age, a single customer photo or negative online review mentioning flies can go viral, deterring countless potential patrons and permanently tarnishing a brand's image.55 The financial fallout includes lost revenue, the cost of product recalls if contamination is discovered, and potential compensation claims. One report estimated that businesses spend an average of $9,000 per year on fly control alone, a cost that pales in comparison to the potential losses from a full-blown infestation.55 HACCP Compliance: The Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) system is a globally recognized, systematic approach to food safety that is a legal requirement for many food businesses. A core principle of HACCP is the identification and control of potential hazards—biological, chemical, and physical.56 Pests, especially flies, are considered a significant biological hazard. A proper HACCP plan must include specific critical control points for pest management, such as maintaining physical barriers (screens, doors), implementing rigorous sanitation schedules, and having a documented pest control program. The presence of flies in a food facility is therefore a direct failure of the HACCP system and can lead to non-compliance and legal penalties.57

Section 3: The Question of Eradication: Strategies, Feasibility, and Consequences

Given the significant harm caused by pest flies, the impulse to seek their complete "extermination" is understandable. However, a scientific approach to pest management requires a critical examination of this goal. It is crucial to distinguish between the concepts of pest control and pest eradication, to understand the sophisticated, multi-tactic strategies of modern pest management, and to recognize the profound biological challenges, particularly insecticide resistance, that render total eradication an untenable goal for most widespread pest fly species. Effective, long-term fly control is not about finding better ways to kill flies, but about understanding and manipulating their evolutionary and ecological dynamics to human advantage.

3.1. Defining the Terms: Pest Control vs. Pest Eradication

The terms "pest control" and "pest extermination" are often used interchangeably in common parlance, but in the context of public health and ecology, they represent fundamentally different philosophies and objectives. Pest Control/Management: This is a continuous, systematic process aimed at reducing or suppressing pest populations to a level where they are no longer causing significant economic or public health harm.58 The goal is not the complete elimination of the species but the mitigation of its negative impacts. This approach acknowledges that the pest is part of an ecosystem and focuses on managing its population below an established threshold, such as the Economic Injury Level (EIL) in agriculture. Pest Eradication: This is the absolute and total destruction of an entire pest population from a defined geographical area.58 It is an ambitious, costly, and often-unrealistic goal. Eradication campaigns are typically only considered for newly introduced invasive species that are confined to a limited, isolated area where they can be contained and eliminated before becoming established. The Screwworm Exception: A Case Study in Eradication: The most celebrated success story in pest fly eradication is that of the New World screwworm fly, Cochliomyia hominivorax, a parasite whose larvae feed on the living flesh of livestock and other warm-blooded animals. This devastating pest was successfully eradicated from North and Central America using the Sterile Insect Technique (SIT). This technique involves mass-rearing and sterilizing male flies with radiation and then releasing them into the wild in overwhelming numbers. Wild females that mate with the sterile males produce no offspring. The success of this program was critically dependent on a unique biological vulnerability of the screwworm: females mate only once in their lifetime.61 This meant that every mating with a sterile male was a reproductive dead end for the population. This biological trait, which is not shared by prolific, polygynous species like the house fly, made the screwworm an ideal but exceptional candidate for eradication via SIT. Its success highlights why such a strategy is not a universal solution for all pest flies.

3.2. An Integrated Approach to Fly Management (IPM)

The modern, scientifically endorsed paradigm for managing pest populations is Integrated Pest Management (IPM). IPM is an ecosystem-based strategy that focuses on long-term prevention of pests and their damage through a combination of techniques. It is a holistic approach that integrates multiple control tactics to minimize economic, health, and environmental risks.49 Management Strategy Specific Tactics Mode of Action Advantages Disadvantages/Limitations Cultural Manure management, sanitation, moisture reduction, waste removal. Eliminates or reduces breeding sites (source reduction). Highly effective, sustainable, low cost, environmentally benign. Labor-intensive, requires consistent effort. Physical/Mechanical Screens, air curtains, sticky traps, baited jug traps, walk-through cattle traps. Creates physical barriers to entry or physically removes adult flies from the population. Non-toxic, can provide continuous control. May have limited efficacy in open areas, requires maintenance. Biological Release of parasitic wasps (Muscidifurax, Spalangia), conservation of dung beetles and predatory mites. Introduces or supports natural enemies that predate or parasitize fly eggs, larvae, or pupae. Self-sustaining, no chemical residue, targets specific pests. Slow to establish, less effective in open environments, initial cost of purchasing organisms. Chemical Residual sprays, baits, larvicides, feed-through insect growth regulators (IGRs). Kills flies via neurotoxicity (adulticides) or disrupts development (larvicides/IGRs). Rapid knockdown of high populations. High risk of insecticide resistance, harms non-target/beneficial insects, potential environmental/health risks.

Table 3: A comparison of the core strategies within an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program for flies. The strength of IPM lies in combining these tactics to create a multi-faceted system that is more effective and sustainable than relying on any single method. 49 The foundation of any effective fly IPM program is cultural control, specifically sanitation and moisture management to eliminate larval breeding sites. This is the most critical step, as it attacks the fly population at the source.66 This is supported by physical controls to exclude or trap adults and biological controls to suppress the survival of immature stages. Chemical controls are reserved as a final tool, used judiciously and in a targeted manner only when monitoring indicates that fly populations have exceeded action thresholds despite the other measures being in place.64

3.3. The Challenge of Chemical Control and Insecticide Resistance

The primary reason that chemical-based eradication strategies are biologically destined to fail against pests like the house fly is their remarkable capacity to evolve insecticide resistance. A single control method, especially a potent chemical, creates an intense and unidirectional selection pressure that the fly's biology is well-equipped to overcome. Rapid Evolution of Resistance: The house fly is a model organism for the study of insecticide resistance, having developed resistance to nearly every chemical class ever used against it, including organochlorines, organophosphates, carbamates, and modern pyrethroids.73 This rapid evolution is fueled by its short generation time (as little as 7-10 days) and high fecundity (a female can lay 500 eggs), which provide immense genetic variation and frequent opportunities for natural selection to act upon any resistant individuals.2 Mechanisms of Resistance: Flies have evolved a sophisticated arsenal of resistance mechanisms at the molecular level. Target-Site Insensitivity: This is a classic form of resistance where the insecticide's molecular target within the insect is altered, preventing the chemical from binding effectively. The best-studied example is "knockdown resistance" (kdr) to pyrethroid insecticides.76 Pyrethroids work by binding to voltage-gated sodium channels in the fly's nerve cells, forcing them to stay open and causing paralysis. The kdr mechanism involves a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the gene encoding this channel protein. The most common mutation, known as L1014F, results in the substitution of the amino acid leucine with phenylalanine at position 1014 of the protein.77 This single change alters the three-dimensional structure of the channel just enough to significantly reduce the binding affinity of pyrethroid molecules, rendering the insecticide ineffective.82 Metabolic Resistance: This mechanism involves the insect's ability to detoxify the insecticide before it can reach its target site. Resistant flies often exhibit an over-expression of detoxification enzymes, primarily from three major families: cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (P450s), glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), and carboxylesterases.76 These enzymes metabolize the insecticide molecules, breaking them down into less toxic, water-soluble compounds that can be easily excreted. A single fly population can possess multiple metabolic resistance mechanisms, sometimes acting synergistically to provide a very high level of protection. Fitness Costs of Resistance: Evolving these resistance mechanisms is not without a biological price. In an environment without the insecticide, resistant individuals may be less fit than their susceptible counterparts. For example, the mutations that confer resistance might make certain physiological processes less efficient, leading to consequences like lower fecundity, slower development, or reduced mating competitiveness.86 This "fitness cost" is a critical concept in resistance management. By rotating different classes of insecticides or implementing periods with no chemical application, an IPM program can allow the more-fit susceptible individuals to outcompete the resistant ones, helping to manage the frequency of resistance genes in the population.

Section 4: The Indispensable Fly: Unseen Roles in a Functioning Ecosystem

While the focus on certain species as pests is justified by their impact on health and the economy, it is crucial to recognize that this represents only a tiny fraction of the vast and diverse order Diptera. The overwhelming majority of fly species are not only harmless but are fundamental to the health and stability of virtually every terrestrial and freshwater ecosystem on the planet. Their roles as decomposers, pollinators, and a foundational part of the food web are so critical that their absence would lead to catastrophic ecological collapse. This reality is often overlooked due to an anthropocentric bias in ecological valuation; we tend to value insects based on their direct, visible benefits to humans (like honey from bees), causing a systematic undervaluation of foundational but less "charismatic" services like decomposition provided by flies.88

4.1. Nature's Cleanup Crew: Flies as Master Decomposers

Decomposition is one of the most vital ecosystem services, responsible for breaking down dead organic matter and recycling essential nutrients back into the soil where they can be used by plants to support new life. Without this process, nutrients would remain locked in dead plants and animals, and ecosystems would quickly grind to a halt.89 Flies are the undisputed champions of this process, particularly in the breakdown of animal remains. Fly Larvae (Maggots) as Primary Decomposers: Flies, especially blow flies (family Calliphoridae) and flesh flies (family Sarcophagidae), are often the very first insects to arrive at a carcass, sometimes within minutes of death.33 They lay their eggs on the remains, and the resulting larvae, or maggots, are voracious consumers of decaying tissue. A large mass of maggots can consume and break down an animal carcass with astonishing speed, preventing the accumulation of dead organic matter and the associated pathogens in the environment.88 Facilitating Microbial Activity: The role of maggots extends beyond mere consumption. By physically breaking down and churning through tissue, they vastly increase the surface area available for colonization by bacteria and fungi, the microbial engines of decomposition. This creates a powerful synergistic relationship where the insects' activity accelerates the work of the microbes, dramatically speeding up the entire process of nutrient cycling.89 Beneficial Human Applications: The remarkable digestive and biological properties of fly larvae have been harnessed by humans in innovative ways, turning the agents of decay into tools for healing and sustainability. Maggot Debridement Therapy (MDT): In a controlled medical setting, the sterile larvae of the green bottle fly, Lucilia sericata, are applied to non-healing wounds, such as diabetic foot ulcers and pressure sores.93 The maggots perform a highly precise form of debridement by secreting a cocktail of powerful proteolytic enzymes—including collagenase, chymotrypsin, and various serine proteases—that selectively liquefy and consume only the necrotic (dead) tissue, leaving healthy granulation tissue unharmed.95 Their secretions also possess potent antimicrobial properties that disinfect the wound and contain compounds that stimulate the growth of new tissue and blood vessels, actively promoting healing.94 Waste Bioconversion with Black Soldier Fly Larvae (BSFL): The larvae of the Black Soldier Fly, Hermetia illucens, are being increasingly utilized on an industrial scale for waste valorization. BSFL are capable of efficiently consuming a vast range of organic waste, from pre-consumer food scraps and brewery grains to animal manure.102 In doing so, they convert this low-value waste into a high-value biomass rich in protein (40-48%) and lipids (25-40%).102 This larval biomass can then be processed into a sustainable, high-quality ingredient for animal feed, particularly for aquaculture and poultry, reducing reliance on traditional sources like fishmeal and soy.108 This process exemplifies a circular bioeconomy, turning a waste problem into a valuable resource.

4.2. The Unsung Pollinators

While bees dominate the public imagination as the quintessential pollinators, flies are the second most important group of pollinating insects worldwide.112 Their contribution to the reproduction of both wild plants and agricultural crops is immense and largely underappreciated. They are known to visit at least 555 plant species, including over 100 cultivated crops such as mango, onion, and, critically, cocoa.113 Types of "Fly Flowers": Many plant species have evolved specific traits to attract flies as their primary pollinators. These "fly flowers" often have characteristics that appeal to the senses of flies, such as pale or dark, fleshy colors (dull browns, purples, deep reds) and, most notably, putrid odors that mimic rotting meat, dung, or fungus. Well-known examples include the Pawpaw (Asimina triloba), Skunk Cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus), and Red Trillium (Trillium erectum), also known as "Stinking Benjamin".114 However, not all fly pollinators are drawn to decay. Many species, such as the bee-mimicking hoverflies (family Syrphidae), are attracted to the same sweet-smelling, brightly colored flowers as bees and are important pollinators in their own right.114 Pollination Efficiency: An individual fly may be a less efficient pollinator than an individual bee on a per-visit basis, as they lack specialized pollen-carrying structures like the pollen baskets on a honeybee's legs.115 However, they compensate for this in several ways. The pollen that adheres to the hairs on a fly's body remains available for transfer to the next flower's stigma. Furthermore, their sheer abundance and diversity often make them the most important group of pollinators in certain ecosystems, especially at high altitudes and latitudes where bee activity is limited by cold temperatures.113 Some studies have even found that common blow flies can carry a greater quantity of pollen on their bodies than a honeybee, highlighting their significant potential.115

4.3. A Foundational Link in the Food Web

Flies, in both their larval and adult stages, represent a critical, energy-dense food source that sits at the base of many terrestrial and freshwater food webs.7 Flies as a Primary Food Source: The abundance of flies makes them a staple food for an enormous diversity of animal life. Their larvae, rich in protein and fat, are a crucial resource for many species. Dependence of Other Species: A vast array of predators relies heavily on flies for sustenance. This includes a majority of insectivorous birds, which depend on insects like flies to feed their young; amphibians such as frogs and salamanders; reptiles like lizards; many species of freshwater fish; and a host of other predatory arthropods, including spiders, dragonflies, and predatory wasps.88 The stability of these predator populations is directly linked to the availability of flies. A significant decline in fly populations would not be a minor disruption but the removal of a cornerstone of the food web, leading to starvation and population crashes among the species that depend on them.

Section 5: The Ecological Fallout of Eradication

Synthesizing the understanding of flies as both specialized pests and indispensable ecosystem engineers allows for a direct and critical assessment of the user's final query: what would be the impact of their eradication? The scientific evidence overwhelmingly indicates that a world without flies would not be a cleaner, healthier world. Instead, the complete eradication of the order Diptera would trigger a series of cascading ecological failures, resulting in a global environmental catastrophe. This hypothetical scenario must be viewed through the lens of the current, real-world biodiversity crisis, where global insect populations are already in steep decline.118

5.1. A World Without Flies: Modeling Cascading Trophic Failures

The attempt to achieve total eradication would likely create a more dangerous and resilient pest population while simultaneously destroying the beneficial species that help regulate them. A massive, global campaign of insecticide application—the only conceivable method for such a goal—would exert an unprecedented selection pressure, rapidly favoring the evolution of multi-resistant "superflies".73 At the same time, this broad-spectrum approach would decimate non-target organisms, including the parasitic wasps and predatory beetles that provide natural biological control, as well as the vast majority of beneficial fly species.67 The paradoxical result would be an ecosystem with fewer beneficial insects, broken ecological cycles, and a small but potent population of pest flies virtually immune to chemical intervention. The attempt to seize total control would result in a total loss of control. Breakdown of Decomposition: The most immediate and dramatic consequence would be the near-cessation of rapid decomposition of animal carcasses. Without the primary colonizing work of blow fly and flesh fly larvae, dead organic matter would accumulate in the environment.88 This would not only create a massive sanitation problem but would also lead to the sequestration of essential nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus. These nutrients, locked away in undecomposed biomass, would be unavailable for uptake by plants, leading to a catastrophic decline in soil fertility and a collapse in primary productivity across terrestrial ecosystems.89 Pollination Crisis: The reproductive cycle of thousands of plant species that rely partially or wholly on fly pollinators would be broken.88 This would lead to the rapid decline and potential extinction of these plants, fundamentally altering the composition of natural plant communities and impacting the herbivores that depend on them. The agricultural sector would also suffer, with crops like cocoa, mangoes, and various fruits and vegetables facing pollination failure. Collapse of Food Webs: The removal of a foundational food source at the base of the food web would trigger a devastating trophic cascade. Populations of countless species of insectivorous birds, amphibians, reptiles, fish, and predatory arthropods that depend on flies and their larvae would plummet due to widespread starvation.88 The ripple effects would travel up the food chain, impacting the predators that feed on these insectivores. This would represent one of the most significant and rapid mass extinction events in modern history, driven by the removal of a single, critical insect order.

5.2. The Future of Fly Management in a Changing Climate

The challenges posed by pest flies are not static; they are being actively amplified by global climate change. This reality makes the development of sustainable management strategies more urgent than ever. Climate Change as a Threat Multiplier: Warmer global temperatures are predicted to have several direct effects on fly populations. These include the expansion of the geographical range of tropical and subtropical species into previously temperate zones, increased rates of overwintering survival, and a longer activity season, allowing for more generations to be produced each year.119 Increased Vector Capacity: Climate change not only affects the vectors but also the pathogens they carry. Higher ambient temperatures can accelerate the replication rate of viruses and bacteria within the fly (the extrinsic incubation period), potentially increasing the fly's vectorial capacity and the overall rate of disease transmission.119 Therefore, the public health and agricultural threats posed by pest flies are expected to intensify in a warming world. Reinforcing the Need for IPM: The escalating threat from flies in a changing climate makes effective management more critical. However, it also makes a reliance on chemical-centric strategies even more untenable. Warmer temperatures can shorten generation times, which in turn can accelerate the rate at which insecticide resistance evolves in a population.119 This underscores the critical need to move away from simplistic chemical solutions and fully embrace the principles of Integrated Pest Management. IPM's focus on sanitation, biological control, and habitat management provides a more resilient and sustainable framework for controlling pest populations in a future where chemical tools will likely become less effective and the pest pressure will be greater.

Conclusion: A Nuanced Verdict and Recommendations

The scientific evidence presents a clear and compelling dichotomy. On one hand, certain synanthropic and hematophagous fly species are undeniably harmful pests, acting as highly efficient vectors for a multitude of pathogens that cause significant disease in humans and devastating economic losses in agriculture. Their control in settings where they pose a direct threat to health and food safety is not only justified but necessary. On the other hand, the concept of their complete "extermination" is a dangerously simplistic and ecologically illiterate notion. Such an endeavor would be practically unfeasible, doomed to failure by the rapid and relentless engine of evolution that drives insecticide resistance. More importantly, it would be an act of profound ecological self-harm. The order Diptera, in its immense diversity, performs indispensable services that form the bedrock of healthy ecosystems. As master decomposers, they recycle the very nutrients that sustain life. As crucial pollinators, they support the reproduction of countless plants. As a foundational food source, they underpin the stability of entire food webs. The ecological fallout from the hypothetical eradication of flies would be swift and catastrophic, leading to accumulating waste, collapsing soil fertility, widespread plant extinction, and the starvation of innumerable animal species that depend on them. Therefore, the question is not whether to eradicate flies, but how to intelligently manage the specific populations that pose a risk. This compels a redefinition of the term "pest." A pest is not an organism, but an organism existing in a state of imbalance with its environment, often an imbalance created by human activity. The solution, therefore, is not to eliminate the organism, but to restore the environmental balance. The evidence overwhelmingly supports a global shift away from eradication-focused, chemical-dependent strategies and toward the widespread adoption of Integrated Pest Management (IPM). IPM strategies—which prioritize sanitation, habitat modification, and biological controls, using chemicals only as a targeted last resort—mitigate the harm caused by pest flies by addressing the root causes of their proliferation. This approach restores a degree of ecological balance, controlling pest populations to levels below those of economic and public health concern while preserving the vital, life-sustaining services provided by the vast and varied world of flies. 참고 자료 A Review: Biochemical Role of House Fly in the Transmission of Medically Important Parasites - ResearchGate, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391443145_A_Review_Biochemical_Role_of_House_Fly_in_the_Transmission_of_Medically_Important_Parasites Musca domestica: INFORMATION - ADW, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Musca_domestica/ House Fly - Field Guide to Common Texas Insects, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://texasinsects.tamu.edu/house-fly/ Filth Flies: Significance and Control in Contingency Operations, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.acq.osd.mil/eie/afpmb/docs/techguides/tg30.pdf Evaluation of the House Fly Musca domestica as a Mechanical Vector for an Anthrax, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012219 Flies as Vectors and Potential Sentinels for Bacterial Pathogens and Antimicrobial Resistance: A Review - MDPI, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/9/6/300 Should I throw away food once a fly has landed on it? - The University of Sydney, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2016/01/04/should-i-throw-away-food-once-a-fly-has-landed-on-it-.html Parasitic load on Musca domestica (Dipthera: Muscidae) from different synanthropic environments in Umuahia metropolis - Academic Journals, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://academicjournals.org/article/article1379690476_Oghale%20et%20al.pdf Flies - Yavapai, AZ, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.yavapaiaz.gov/Resident-Services/Environmental-Safety/Environmental-Disease-Control/Flies (PDF) Musca Domestica: A Vector of Pathogenic Microorganisms and Biocontrol Approaches - ResearchGate, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351552663_Musca_Domestica_A_Vector_of_Pathogenic_Microorganisms_and_Biocontrol_Approaches House Flies Are Underappreciated Yet Important Reservoirs and Vectors of Microbial Threats to Animal and Human Health, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10054770/ How Flies Impact Food Safety and What You Can Do About It - Ecowize, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ecowize.co.za/flies-impact-food-safety/ Phylogenetic characterization of bacteria in the gut of house flies (Musca domestica L.) | FEMS Microbiology Ecology | Oxford Academic, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://academic.oup.com/femsec/article/79/3/581/491160 Quantitative contamination and transfer of Escherichia coli from foods by houseflies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera - Gilbert Industries, Inc., 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.gilbertinc.com/Quantitative_contamination_and_transfer.pdf Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from the external and internal parts of the housefly | JABET - Bangladesh Society for Microbiology, Immunology, and Advanced Biotechnology, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.bsmiab.org/jabet/178-1683613081-molecular-characterization-of-multidrug-resistant-bacteria-isolated-from-the-external-and-internal-parts-of-the-housefly Detection of Intestinal Parasites Transmitted Mechanically by House Flies (Musca domestica, Diptera: Muscidae) Infesting Slaughterhouses in Khartoum State, Sudan, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://clinmedjournals.org/articles/ijtd/international-journal-of-tropical-diseases-ijtd-1-011.php?jid=ijtd Transfer of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to Spinach by House Flies, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) - APS Journals, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/pdf/10.1094/PHYTO-09-12-0217-FI Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Musca domestica L.: Temporospatial Examination of Bacteria Population Dynamics and House Fly Antimicrobial Responses | PLOS One - Research journals, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0079224 Housefly: Common zoonotic diseases transmitted and control - CABI Digital Library, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20220218511 A systematic review of human pathogens carried by the housefly (Musca domestica L.), 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6104014/ Transmission of pathogens by Stomoxys flies (Diptera, Muscidae): a ..., 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.parasite-journal.org/articles/parasite/full_html/2013/01/parasite130035/parasite130035.html House Fly Diseases: Types, Transmissions, and More - Pests - Orkin, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.orkin.com/pests/flies/house-flies/house-flies-and-disease Health Risks Associated With House Flies - Environmental Factor, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://environmentalfactor.com/health-risks-associated-with-house-flies/ FLY BORNE DISEASES IN ANIMALS - Unique Scientific Publishers, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://uniquescientificpublishers.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/114-127.pdf A Different Glance on Flies in Terms of Public Health or Why We Cannot Give Up on Flies? - Journal, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://acquaintpublications.com/article/a_different_glance_on_flies_in_terms_of_public_health_or_why_we_cannot_give_up_on_flies Housefly (Musca domestica) and Blow Fly (Protophormia terraenovae) as Vectors of Bacteria Carrying Colistin Resistance Genes | Applied and Environmental Microbiology - ASM Journals, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/aem.01736-17 House Flies (Musca domestica) from Swine and Poultry Farms Carrying Antimicrobial Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella - PubMed Central, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9968028/ Environmental and Sex Effects on Bacterial Carriage by Adult House Flies (Musca domestica L.) - MDPI, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/11/7/401 Housefly - Wikipedia, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Housefly EENY-048/IN205: House fly, Musca domestica Linnaeus (Insecta: Diptera: Muscidae), 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/IN205 Flies Impacting Livestock, Poultry and Food Safety | National Agricultural Library - USDA, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.nal.usda.gov/research-tools/food-safety-research-projects/flies-impacting-livestock-poultry-and-food-safety-6 Economic Impact of Stable Flies (Diptera: Muscidae) on Dairy and Beef Cattle Production | Journal of Medical Entomology | Oxford Academic, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/49/1/198/863180 Insecticides and Forensic Entomology: Understanding effects on ..., 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://hammer.purdue.edu/articles/thesis/_b_Insecticides_and_Forensic_Entomology_Understanding_effects_on_blow_fly_Diptera_Calliphoridae_oviposition_development_and_carcass_decomposition_b_/28817597 A Review of Bacterial Interactions With Blow Flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) of Medical, Veterinary, and Forensic Importance - FLIES Facility at Texas A&M University, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://forensicentomology.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/10/Tomberlin-et-al-2017.pdf Vector-borne diseases - World Health Organization (WHO), 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/vector-borne-diseases Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Pathogens In Developed and Developing Countries: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - PMC - PubMed Central, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4140330/ Developing countries and infectious disease | EBSCO Research Starters, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/consumer-health/developing-countries-and-infectious-disease Environmental Factors Associated with High Fly Densities and Diarrhea in Vellore, India, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/aem.01236-15 Environmental Factors Associated with High Fly Densities and Diarrhea in Vellore, India, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279300173_Environmental_Factors_Associated_with_High_Fly_Densities_and_Diarrhea_in_Vellore_India Evaluation of Whole Genome Sequencing for Outbreak Detection of Salmonella enterica | PLOS One - Research journals, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0087991 Detecting Outbreaks with Whole Genome Sequencing | AMD - CDC, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.cdc.gov/advanced-molecular-detection/about/detecting-outbreaks.html First molecular-based detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus in the field-collected houseflies - PMC, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8260644/ A systematic review of human pathogens carried by the housefly (Musca domestica L.), 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://d-nb.info/1169194389/34 More Than Annoyance: Flies Can Impact Health and Profits - Drovers, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.drovers.com/news/beef-production/more-annoyance-flies-can-impact-health-and-profits Understanding Horn Flies and Their Impact on Cattle - Altosid® IGR, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.altosidigr.com/blog/horn-flies-impact-on-cattle/ How Many Flies is Too Many? Take Control with Altosid IGR, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.altosidigr.com/blog/economic-threshold/ Economic impact of stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae) on dairy and beef cattle production - Publication : USDA ARS, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publication/?seqNo115=250712 6 Impacts of Flies on Farms - Dalton Supplies, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.daltonsupplies.com/blogs/news/impacts-of-flies-on-farms Integrated Pest Management of Flies in Texas Dairies - AgriLife Extension Entomology, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://extensionentomology.tamu.edu/resources/management-guides/integrated-pest-management-of-flies-in-texas-dairies/ Stable Flies on Pastured Cattle | UNL Beef, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://beef.unl.edu/beefwatch/2023/stable-flies-pastured-cattle/ Horn Flies and Grazing Cattle | UNL Beef, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://beef.unl.edu/horn-flies-and-grazing-cattle/ Large Flies and Food Safety | Ecolab, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ecolab.com/articles/2024/03/large-flies-and-food-safety House Flies and Food Safety - ANAB Blog, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://blog.ansi.org/anab/house-flies-and-food-safety/ Fruit Flies and Food Safety - Ecolab, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ecolab.com/articles/2024/03/fruit-flies-and-food-safety 5 ways flies can impact your business | Rentokil, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.rentokil.com/blog/industry-insights/5-ways-flies-impact-businesses Specialized Processes | Minnesota Department of Agriculture, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.mda.state.mn.us/food-feed/specialized-processes Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) - Food Standards Agency, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.food.gov.uk/business-guidance/hazard-analysis-and-critical-control-point-haccp rodentsolutioninc.com, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://rodentsolutioninc.com/blog/whats-the-difference-between-pest-control-and-pest-extermination/#:~:text=Traditional%20Definition&text=Exterminators%20are%20typically%20called%20in,in%20preventing%20and%20controlling%20pests. Is Pest Control the Same as Extermination? - Mosquito Squad, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.mosquitosquad.com/greater-fort-worth/blog/is-pest-control-the-same-as-extermination/ cms.ctahr.hawaii.edu, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://cms.ctahr.hawaii.edu/epp/Education/Study-Guide-Packets/APC-Core/APC-Unit1#:~:text=Pest%20Control%20Goals&text=suppression%20%2D%20reducing%20pest%20numbers%20or,destroying%20an%20entire%20pest%20population. Deconstructing the eradication of new world screwworm in North America: retrospective analysis and climate warming effects - PubMed Central, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6849717/ Integrated Pest Management | National Invasive Species Information Center, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/subject/integrated-pest-management Integrated Pest Management: An Update on the Sustainability Approach to Crop Protection, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11465254/ Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Principles | US EPA, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.epa.gov/safepestcontrol/integrated-pest-management-ipm-principles Preventing Disease Transmission in Livestock and Poultry: Vectors-Flies - The Center for Food Security and Public Health, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/Infection_Control/Routes/English/fly_control.pdf Flies Management Guidelines--UC IPM, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://ipm.ucanr.edu/PMG/PESTNOTES/pn7457.html Integrated Pest Management for Fly Control in Maine ... - Maine.gov, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.maine.gov/dacf/php/integrated_pest_management/documents/UMCEFlyIPMBulletin.pdf Livestock IPM - Cornell CALS, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://cals.cornell.edu/integrated-pest-management/outreach-education/ipm-areas/livestock-ipm Integrated Pest Management (IPM) of Nuisance Flies on Animal Facilities - YouTube, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqhrIq4H6hc Muscidifurax raptor and M. raptorellus - Biocontrol Agent Fact Sheet - Cornell CALS, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://cals.cornell.edu/integrated-pest-management/outreach-education/fact-sheets/muscidifurax-raptor-and-m-raptorellus-biocontrol-agent-fact-sheet Muscidifurax raptor - Biological Control, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://biocontrol.entomology.cornell.edu/parasitoids/muscidifurax.php IPM for Managing Barn Flies, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.northeastipm.org/saremod/flies.pdf Insecticide resistance in house flies from the United States: Resistance levels and frequency of pyrethroid resistance alleles | Request PDF - ResearchGate, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258851583_Insecticide_resistance_in_house_flies_from_the_United_States_Resistance_levels_and_frequency_of_pyrethroid_resistance_alleles Organophosphate Insecticides Resistance in Field Populations of House Flies, Musca domestica L.: Levels of Resistance and Acetylcholinesterase Activity - MDPI, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/13/2/192 Status and preliminary mechanism of resistance to insecticides in a field strain of housefly (Musca domestica, L) - SciELO, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.scielo.br/j/rbent/a/8h6d449CV43ZcfGqyk4rjrF/?lang=en Frequency of Pyrethroid Insecticide Resistance kdr Gene and Its Associated Enzyme Modulation in Housefly, Musca domestica L. Populations From Jhang, Pakistan - Frontiers, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-science/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.806456/full Frequency of kdr Gene in House Fly Field Populations: Correlation of Pyrethroid Resistance and kdr Frequency - BioOne Complete, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://bioone.org/openurl?genre=article&issn=0022-0493&volume=97&issue=3&spage=1036 Phenotypes of the pyrethroid knockdown resistance allele, kdr (L1014F) - ResearchGate, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Phenotypes-of-the-pyrethroid-knockdown-resistance-allele-kdr-L1014F-and-the_tbl1_8431209 Multiple Origins of kdr-type Resistance in the House Fly, Musca domestica | PLOS One, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052761 Investigating the molecular mechanisms of deltamethrin resistance in Musca domestica populations from Saudi Arabia - PMC, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11831778/ Level of association between the L1014F (kdr-West) mutation and pyrethroids resistance (RR - ResearchGate, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Level-of-association-between-the-L1014F-kdr-West-mutation-and-pyrethroids-resistance_fig4_366121806 CRISPR/Cas9 modified An. gambiae carrying kdr mutation L1014F functionally validate its contribution in insecticide resistance and combined effect with metabolic enzymes | PLOS Genetics, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1009556 Insights into insecticide-resistance mechanisms in invasive species: Challenges and control strategies - Frontiers, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2022.1112278/full Autosomal Interactions and Mechanisms of Pyrethroid Resistance in House Flies, Musca domestica - PMC, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3149284/ Mechanism of Insecticide Resistance in Insects/Pests - Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, http://www.pjoes.com/pdf-108513-46260?filename=Mechanism%20of%20Insecticide.pdf Fitness cost, realized heritability and stability of resistance to spiromesifen in house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) | Request PDF - ResearchGate, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342705921_Fitness_cost_realized_heritability_and_stability_of_resistance_to_spiromesifen_in_house_fly_Musca_domestica_L_Diptera_Muscidae Fitness costs of resistance to insecticides in insects - PMC, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10620942/ Tiny But Mighty: How Flies Shape Agroecosystems - LTER Network, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://lternet.edu/stories/tiny-but-mighty-how-flies-shape-agroecosystems/ A study to access the significant role of insects in decomposition and ..., 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.biochemjournal.com/archives/2024/vol8issue9S/PartB/S-8-9-11-884.pdf The Ecological Significance of Insect Decomposition - Number Analytics, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ecological-significance-insect-decomposition The Role of Insects in Decomposition and Recycling Nutrients - Garden Route Safari Camp, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://gardenroutesafaricamp.com/the-role-of-insects-in-decomposition-and-recycling-nutrients/ Unidirectional dispersal of blow fly larvae following decomposition fluids from a pig carcass - South African Journal of Science, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://sajs.co.za/article/view/17589/21710 Maggot debridement therapy: A systematic review - ResearchGate, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269180797_Maggot_debridement_therapy_A_systematic_review Maggot therapy - Wikipedia, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maggot_therapy Maggot debridement therapy: a systematic review - BiologiQ, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.biologiq.nl/UserFiles/MDT%20Systematic%20review%20BJCN%20Dec%2014.pdf www.researchgate.net, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262878350_Identification_and_characterisation_of_different_proteases_in_Lucilia_sericata_medicinal_maggots_involved_in_maggot_debridement_therapy#:~:text=Collagenase%20is%20an%20enzyme%20that,using%20for%20maggot%20debridement%20therapy. Identification and characterisation of different proteases in Lucilia sericata medicinal maggots involved in maggot debridement therapy | Request PDF - ResearchGate, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262878350_Identification_and_characterisation_of_different_proteases_in_Lucilia_sericata_medicinal_maggots_involved_in_maggot_debridement_therapy A Complete Guide to Maggot Therapy - 8. Maggot Debridement - Open Book Publishers, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0300/ch8.xhtml A Novel Serine Protease Secreted by Medicinal Maggots Enhances Plasminogen Activator-Induced Fibrinolysis, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3960166/ A novel mechanism in maggot debridement therapy: protease in excretion/secretion promotes hepatocyte growth factor production - American Journal of Physiology, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://journals.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1152/ajpcell.00065.2011 Lucifensins, the Insect Defensins of Biomedical Importance: The Story behind Maggot Therapy - MDPI, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/7/3/251 Evaluating Different Supplements on the Growth Performance and Bioconversion Efficiency of Kitchen Waste by Black Soldier Fly Larvae - MDPI, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/16/1/22 What Is The Waste To Biomass Conversion Rate Of Black Soldier Fly Larvae Fed On Organic Waste - Consensus Academic Search Engine, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://consensus.app/questions/waste-biomass-conversion-rate-black-soldier-larvae/ Black soldier fly larvae efficiently bioconvert the organic fraction of municipal solid waste thanks to the functional plasticit - AIR Unimi, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://air.unimi.it/retrieve/b3c88ed6-51be-4fbc-9842-9171787b7caa/jiff-article-p157_9.pdf Valorisation of Organic Waste By-Products Using Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) as a Bio-Convertor - MDPI, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8345 Nutritional content and bioconversion efficiency of Hermetia illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae): harvest as larvae or prepupae? - University of Pretoria, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://repository.up.ac.za/server/api/core/bitstreams/709e5090-d4a5-4247-8c7c-87a89cc1752c/content Abstract Effect of different feed on nutritional content of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens): A systematic review and meta- - ResearchGate, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frendy-Afandi/publication/381660443_OPEN_ACCESS_Effect_of_different_feed_on_nutritional_content_of_black_soldier_fly_Hermetia_illucens_A_systematic_review_and_meta-analysis/links/6679863c1846ca33b84dda53/OPEN-ACCESS-Effect-of-different-feed-on-nutritional-content-of-black-soldier-fly-Hermetia-illucens-A-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis.pdf Synergistic bioconversion of organic waste by black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae and thermophilic cellulose-degrading bacteria - Frontiers, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1288227/full (PDF) Bioconversion of biowaste by black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.) for dried larvae production: A life cycle assessment and environmental impact analysis - ResearchGate, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372307176_Bioconversion_of_biowaste_by_black_soldier_fly_larvae_Hermetia_illucens_L_for_dried_larvae_production_A_life_cycle_assessment_and_environmental_impact_analysis Feed conversion rate (FCR) obtained over 15 production batches (B1 to... - ResearchGate, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Feed-conversion-rate-FCR-obtained-over-15-production-batches-B1-to-B15-The-FCR-is_fig2_346414578 Production and Optimization of Hermetia illucens (L.) Larvae Reared on Food Waste and Utilized as Feed Ingredient - MDPI, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/9864 The Role of Flies as Pollinators of Horticultural Crops: An Australian Case Study with Worldwide Relevance - PubMed Central, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7349676/ The forgotten flies: the importance of non-syrphid Diptera as pollinators - PubMed Central, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4389612/ Fly Pollination - Forest Service - USDA, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.fs.usda.gov/wildflowers/pollinators/animals/flies.shtml Five reasons flies are awesome (despite being really annoying) - CSIRO, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.csiro.au/en/news/All/Articles/2018/January/five-reasons-flies-are-awesome The Insect Effect: Insect Decline and the Future of Our Planet – Thompson Earth Systems Institute - Florida Museum of Natural History, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/earth-systems/the-insect-effect/ Mayflies (Ephemeroptera) and Their Contributions to Ecosystem Services - PubMed Central, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6628430/ Insects Matter. Why Are We Wiping Them Out? | Earth.Org, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://earth.org/insects-matter-so-why-are-we-wiping-them-out/ The impact of climate changes on microorganisms and their vectors - ResearchGate, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393563138_The_impact_of_climate_changes_on_microorganisms_and_their_vectors Potential distribution of Musca domestica in Jesús María Municipality, Aguascalientes, Mexico, based on climate change scenarios - SciELO México, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S2007-11242019000100014&script=sci_arttext_plus&tlng=en Impacts of Changing Climate on Arthropod Vectors and Diseases Transmission, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379499453_Impacts_of_Changing_Climate_on_Arthropod_Vectors_and_Diseases_Transmission The Impact of Climate Change on Agricultural Insect Pests - MDPI, 8월 1, 2025에 액세스, https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/12/5/440