Deep Research Archives

The Peninsula Paradox: South Korea's Geopolitical Position Between Peril and Power

Introduction: A Nation at the Crossroads

The assertion that the Republic of Korea (South Korea) occupies a "very unfavorable" geopolitical position is a common and understandable one. Situated in a region defined by the confluence of great power interests, historical animosities, and an unresolved civil war, the nation faces a unique and formidable set of challenges. This reality, however, presents a complex paradox: South Korea's geographic and historical constraints are in constant tension with its remarkable economic, technological, and cultural power. This very tension is the defining characteristic of its modern geopolitical identity.1 The nation is engaged in a perpetual, multi-dimensional balancing act. This is not merely a straightforward choice between its security guarantor, the United States, and its primary economic partner, China. It is a complex strategic calculus that must simultaneously account for the existential military threat from North Korea, the historically fraught relationship with Japan, and the strategic interests of a resurgent Russia, all while navigating its own dynamic and often polarized domestic political landscape.4 While South Korea's location presents undeniable and severe vulnerabilities, its strategic response—leveraging economic indispensability, formidable soft power, and a flexible middle-power diplomacy—has allowed it to transform a potentially disadvantageous position into one of pivotal global influence. Its future success will depend on its ability to manage these inherent contradictions with increasing sophistication. This report will first dissect the vulnerabilities that define South Korea's peril, then analyze the strategic assets that constitute its power, and finally, synthesize these elements to propose strategic pathways for navigating the turbulent decades ahead. Table 1: A Geopolitical SWOT Analysis of South Korea

Strengths Weaknesses • Global leadership in critical technologies (semiconductors, batteries) 7

• Robust security alliance with the United States 4

• Formidable soft power ("Hallyu" or the Korean Wave) 10

• Advanced, self-reliant military capabilities and a growing defense industry 10 • Extreme economic dependence on China as an export market and supply chain node 5

• Unresolved historical disputes with Japan, hindering trilateral cooperation 14

• De facto geographical isolation, functioning as a strategic island 16

• Deep domestic political polarization affecting foreign policy consistency 17 Opportunities Threats • Growing role as a "middle power" or "Global Pivotal State" 4

• Leadership in shaping regional norms and institutions (e.g., IPEF, ASEAN+3) 19

• Potential as a key hub for emerging Arctic shipping routes 21

• Expanding defense exports to new partners (e.g., NATO members) 9 • Direct military and nuclear threat from North Korea 23

• Escalating US-China strategic competition forcing difficult choices 25

• Potential for US alliance decoupling or extortionate burden-sharing demands 27

• Supply chain weaponization by regional powers 25

Section I: The Weight of Geography and History: An Anatomy of Vulnerability

South Korea's strategic landscape is fundamentally shaped by a series of profound and persistent vulnerabilities. These challenges, rooted in its geography and the unresolved conflicts of the 20th century, validate the perception of its position as precarious.

1.1 The Unending Standoff: The North Korean Nuclear Sword

The most immediate and defining feature of South Korea's security environment is the existential threat posed by North Korea. This is not a distant or theoretical danger but a constant reality shaped by one of the world's most militarized borders.1 The Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) has developed a formidable arsenal designed to hold its southern neighbor, and its allies, at risk. As of 2024-2025, North Korea is estimated to possess an arsenal of approximately 50 nuclear weapons, with the capacity to produce enough fissile material for six to seven additional weapons per year.24 Its military modernization has focused on diversifying its delivery systems, which now include not only intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) capable of reaching the United States but also a range of tactical nuclear weapons designed for battlefield use on the Korean Peninsula.23 Recent developments, such as the deployment of nuclear-capable missiles on new naval destroyers and ongoing work on submarine-launched platforms, enhance the survivability of its nuclear forces and complicate deterrence calculations for Seoul and Washington.23 This nuclear threat is compounded by North Korea's massive conventional military. A significant portion of its long-range artillery is positioned within striking distance of the Seoul metropolitan area, home to nearly half of South Korea's population and the heart of its economy. This creates a permanent state of vulnerability, where a conventional conflict could rapidly escalate and cause catastrophic damage.33 Pyongyang's willingness to engage in brinkmanship is regularly demonstrated through provocative actions, such as simulated nuclear counterstrike drills and frequent ballistic missile tests, which underscore the credibility of its deterrent and its rejection of denuclearization talks.27

1.2 Caught Between Giants: The US-China Strategic Dilemma

South Korea is confronted by a classic and increasingly acute strategic dilemma: its national security is guaranteed by its alliance with the United States, while its economic prosperity is deeply intertwined with China.5 For decades, Seoul managed this challenge through a policy of "strategic ambiguity," often summarized by the phrase anmi kyŏngjung (안미경중, 安美經中) — "security with the US, economy with China." However, the intensification of the US-China rivalry is making this balancing act untenable.36 The 2016-2017 crisis over the deployment of the US Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system serves as the starkest illustration of this predicament. Intended as a defensive measure against North Korean missiles, the system's powerful radar was perceived by Beijing as a threat to its own strategic deterrent. China responded not with formal sanctions but with a sweeping campaign of unofficial economic retaliation that targeted South Korean industries, including tourism, entertainment, and retail conglomerates like the Lotte Group, which had provided the land for the THAAD battery.38 This episode was a watershed moment, demonstrating China's readiness to weaponize its economic leverage to achieve geopolitical objectives and exposing the profound vulnerability of the South Korean economy. This dilemma has been further exacerbated by the ongoing US-China "tech war." US export controls on advanced semiconductor technology, first announced in October 2022 and subsequently updated, directly impact the global operations of South Korean tech giants like Samsung and SK Hynix. These firms, which dominate the global memory chip market, have invested tens of billions of dollars in manufacturing facilities in China, which are now subject to complex and restrictive US regulations.7 This forces South Korean companies to navigate conflicting regulatory demands from their primary security ally and their largest trading partner, potentially compelling them to undertake costly and disruptive restructuring of their global supply chains.43

1.3 The Burden of the Past: Unresolved Conflicts with Japan

Despite being vibrant democracies, advanced economies, and key US allies, the relationship between South Korea and Japan is chronically plagued by unresolved historical grievances from Japan's colonial rule (1910–1945).14 These are not minor diplomatic irritants; they are deeply emotional issues that touch upon national identity and justice, frequently inflaming public opinion and derailing diplomatic progress. The two most prominent disputes are the issue of "comfort women," a euphemism for the victims of the Japanese Imperial Army's system of sexual slavery during World War II, and the territorial dispute over a group of islets known as Dokdo in Korea and Takeshima in Japan.15 While agreements have been attempted, such as the 2015 "comfort women" deal, they have often unraveled due to domestic political backlash in South Korea, where they are seen as insufficient, or perceived backtracking by Japanese political leaders.44 The strategic consequence of this persistent friction is a significant impediment to the formation of a robust and effective trilateral security framework among Seoul, Tokyo, and Washington. While cooperation has improved recently, the underlying historical tensions create a ceiling on the depth of trust and interoperability. This is a critical vulnerability, as seamless coordination between South Korea and Japan is essential for a coherent response to North Korean provocations and for presenting a united front in the face of China's growing regional influence.4 This unresolved historical baggage creates a strategic seam in the US-led alliance architecture in the Indo-Pacific.

1.4 An Island by Land: Maritime Dependence and Vulnerability

Geographically, South Korea is a peninsula, but geopolitically, it functions as an island. The heavily fortified and impassable Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) with North Korea severs any land-based connection to the Eurasian continent, a condition that profoundly shapes its economic and strategic reality.16 This isolation makes South Korea overwhelmingly dependent on maritime trade. Over 99% of its total trade volume is transported by sea, making the security of Sea Lanes of Communication (SLOCs) a paramount national interest.21 The nation is a major energy importer, with critical supplies of oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) arriving via tankers that must traverse vulnerable maritime chokepoints, including the Strait of Malacca and the increasingly contested South China Sea.49 The Korea Strait, the body of water separating South Korea from Japan, is itself a strategic chokepoint of global significance. It is a vital artery for all of Northeast Asia's maritime commerce and is envisioned as a key southern gateway for the potential Northern Sea Route (NSR), an Arctic shipping lane that could shorten transit times between Asia and Europe.21 The immense strategic value of this strait makes it a locus of interest and potential friction for all regional powers. Any disruption to the freedom of navigation in these key waterways, whether due to conflict, piracy, or coercion, would have an immediate and catastrophic impact on the South Korean economy.

Section II: The Fulcrum of Influence: Forging Strategic Assets from Adversity

Despite its significant vulnerabilities, South Korea has cultivated a unique and powerful set of strategic assets. These strengths, often developed in direct response to its challenging environment, allow it to not only survive but also to project influence and shape its own destiny on the world stage. The nation's most formidable assets were not developed in a vacuum but were forged in the crucible of its geopolitical reality; the constant threat from the North necessitated the deep alliance with the US, and the lack of natural resources and a small domestic market forced an outward-looking, high-tech industrialization that has made it indispensable to the global economy.

2.1 The Alliance Advantage: More Than a Shield

The security alliance with the United States, forged in the Korean War and codified in the 1953 Mutual Defense Treaty, remains the bedrock of South Korea's national defense.4 It provides a powerful deterrent against North Korean aggression through the forward deployment of approximately 28,500 US troops, advanced military hardware, and an unambiguous security guarantee. Crucially, this alliance extends to the nuclear realm. The US "nuclear umbrella," or extended deterrence, is a vital component of regional stability. This commitment has been recently and tangibly reaffirmed through high-level agreements like the Washington Declaration and the establishment of the Nuclear Consultative Group (NCG). These mechanisms provide Seoul with a voice in joint nuclear planning and are critical for reassuring South Korea, thereby discouraging it from developing its own independent nuclear arsenal—a move that would destabilize the entire region.4 Beyond its defensive role, the alliance acts as a significant force multiplier. It grants South Korea access to cutting-edge military technology, sophisticated intelligence-sharing platforms, and regular, large-scale joint training exercises that ensure a high degree of interoperability between the two militaries.51 This deep integration makes the combined ROK-US forces far more capable than the sum of their individual parts. The alliance also elevates South Korea's diplomatic stature, providing it with a powerful partner in global forums and strengthening its hand in international negotiations, which is a foundational element of its ambition to become a "Global Pivotal State".52

2.2 The Economic Juggernaut: A Linchpin of Global Technology

South Korea's economic transformation from a war-devastated aid recipient to one of the world's largest economies is a cornerstone of its national power.10 This economic strength is built on a foundation of technological supremacy in sectors that are critical to the 21st-century global economy. South Korean firms, most notably Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, hold a dominant position in the global market for memory semiconductors (both DRAM and NAND flash), which are essential components in nearly all modern electronic devices, from smartphones to data centers.7 Furthermore, South Korea is a key player in the advanced logic chip foundry business, manufacturing processors for global tech companies.8 This central role in the high-tech supply chain makes the global economy deeply dependent on South Korean manufacturing. The country is also a leader in next-generation industries. It is one of the world's top three producers of batteries for electric vehicles (EVs) and is making significant investments in green hydrogen and other renewable energy technologies, positioning itself as an indispensable partner in the global transition to a low-carbon economy.55 This technological and industrial might is not merely a source of wealth; it is a powerful instrument of statecraft. In an era of increasing techno-nationalism and supply chain competition, South Korea's control over these critical technologies provides it with significant strategic leverage in its relationships with both the United States and China, both of whom rely on its industrial output.41

2.3 The Cultural Superpower: The "Hallyu" Phenomenon

In recent decades, South Korea has developed a uniquely potent form of influence: soft power. This is the ability to shape global preferences through attraction and appeal rather than coercion. The primary vehicle for this influence is the Hallyu, or Korean Wave—the explosive global popularity of South Korean cultural exports.10 This phenomenon encompasses a wide range of cultural products, including K-pop music, led by global superstars like BTS; K-dramas and films that have achieved worldwide acclaim, such as the Oscar-winning movie Parasite and the Netflix series Squid Game; and a globally influential cosmetics and beauty industry (K-beauty).10 Hallyu is far more than just entertainment; it is a multi-billion dollar export industry that drives tourism, enhances brand Korea, and creates a positive "halo effect" for other South Korean products, from smartphones to automobiles.11 The South Korean government actively supports these cultural industries as a key pillar of its public diplomacy. The global appeal of Hallyu creates a reservoir of goodwill, fosters a positive national image, and provides a unique platform for diplomatic engagement.60 This cultural reach, which far exceeds what would be expected given the country's size, provides South Korea with a distinct and valuable form of global influence that complements its hard economic and military power. This synergy is powerful; the global tech leadership of companies like Samsung provides the platforms (smartphones, smart TVs) on which Hallyu content is consumed, while the cultural appeal of that content reinforces the desirability of the technology, creating a virtuous cycle of influence.

2.4 The Middle Power Mandate: Navigating the Great Power Game

Facing the constant pressure of being situated among larger, more powerful neighbors, South Korea has consciously adopted a strategy of "middle power" diplomacy.18 This approach is designed to create diplomatic space and influence by acting as a bridge-builder, a facilitator of cooperation, and a champion of the rules-based international order, rather than simply aligning with one great power bloc.3 This strategic identity has evolved over time. Early iterations, such as the "Balancer in Northeast Asia" theory under the Roh Moo-hyun administration, have given way to the more ambitious and proactive vision of becoming a "Global Pivotal State" (GPS).4 The GPS concept, articulated in South Korea's Indo-Pacific Strategy, envisions the country taking on a leading role in setting agendas and building coalitions to address global challenges, from supply chain resilience to climate change and democratic governance.66 South Korea actively pursues this strategy through vigorous participation in multilateral forums like the G20 and ASEAN+3, and by initiating its own "minilateral" groupings. A key example is MIKTA, an informal partnership comprising Mexico, Indonesia, South Korea, Turkey, and Australia, which serves as a consultative platform for middle powers to coordinate on global issues.20 This diplomatic networking allows South Korea to build coalitions of like-minded states, amplifying its influence and providing an alternative to being forced into a binary choice in the great power competition.

Section III: Navigating the Future: Strategic Pathways for a Pivotal State

To secure its future prosperity and security, South Korea must skillfully leverage its strategic assets to mitigate its inherent vulnerabilities. This requires a sophisticated grand strategy that is adaptable, resilient, and multi-faceted, directly addressing the question of the "way forward." The greatest impediment to implementing such a strategy, however, is not external pressure but internal division. The sharp, often ideological, swings in foreign policy between conservative and progressive administrations create a strategic unpredictability that can be exploited by adversaries and can frustrate allies, undermining the long-term coherence of any grand strategy.4 Overcoming this domestic constraint is paramount. Table 2: Comparative Analysis of ROK Foreign Policy Orientations

Key Issue Yoon Administration ("Value-Based/Alliance-First") Lee Administration ("Pragmatic/Autonomy-Focused") United States Deepen the comprehensive strategic alliance; expand trilateral cooperation with Japan; fully support the US Indo-Pacific strategy.4 Maintain a strong alliance but seek greater operational autonomy; exercise caution against over-alignment in the US-China rivalry.68 China Emphasize "strategic clarity"; actively de-risk from economic coercion; vocally support the rules-based order against revisionism.25 Pursue "pragmatic" engagement; manage relations to protect economic interests; avoid provoking Beijing unnecessarily.17 North Korea Prioritize deterrence and pressure; view denuclearization as a precondition for significant engagement and sanctions relief.4 Prioritize dialogue and engagement; pursue risk reduction and peaceful coexistence; seek to reopen communication channels.68 Japan Promote future-oriented cooperation; compartmentalize historical issues to advance security and economic collaboration.4 Insist that addressing historical grievances remains a priority; view cooperation as conditional on Japan's stance on the past.71

3.1 Calibrating the Alliance-Autonomy Spectrum: The Quest for Smart Power

The central challenge for South Korean statecraft is to find the optimal balance between deep integration within the US alliance system and the pursuit of greater strategic autonomy.68 This is not a static choice but a dynamic calibration. The conservative approach, exemplified by the Yoon administration, prioritizes strengthening the alliance with the US and trilateral cooperation with Japan as the primary bulwark against regional threats. This strategy involves a clear, value-based alignment with Washington's Indo-Pacific strategy.4 The progressive alternative, often associated with leaders like Lee Jae-myung, advocates for a more "pragmatic" balance, seeking to maintain the US alliance while simultaneously engaging China and Russia to preserve economic interests and avoid entrapment in great power conflict.17 The most effective path forward is not a binary choice between these poles but a "smart power" strategy. This would involve leveraging the hard power security guarantee of the US alliance as a non-negotiable foundation, while independently and flexibly deploying South Korea's own formidable economic, technological, and cultural assets to maximize its national interest in any given scenario.

3.2 Economic Statecraft: De-risking, Not Decoupling

The primary lesson from past economic shocks, such as the THAAD retaliation and the 2021 urea solution crisis, is the urgent need to build greater supply chain resilience.19 The way forward is a strategy of "de-risking," not decoupling, from China. This involves a targeted reduction of dependencies in critical sectors—such as key industrial materials and minerals—by diversifying import sources and cultivating alternative export markets, without severing the broader economic relationship.25 Key policy instruments are already being put in place to achieve this. The Supply Chain Stabilization Act, which took effect in June 2024, establishes a government committee and a substantial fund (up to $7.2 billion) to support companies in their diversification efforts.19 On the international front, active participation in multilateral frameworks like the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) provides a platform for building more resilient and secure supply chains with like-minded partners.19 Domestically, industrial policies like the K-Chips Act, which provides tax incentives and R&D support, are crucial for ensuring that South Korea's core strategic asset—its semiconductor industry—remains at the technological frontier.8 This fusion of economic and security policy is central to South Korea's future; a policy to protect semiconductor supply chains is simultaneously a policy that underwrites future military capability.

3.3 Hard Power for a Hard Neighborhood: Defense Innovation 4.0

A credible, self-reliant defense posture is an essential component of South Korea's future strategy. "Defense Innovation 4.0" is the blueprint for this effort, driven by two imperatives: countering the advancing military capabilities of North Korea and addressing the demographic reality of a shrinking pool of military-age conscripts.12 The core of this reform is to create a smaller, smarter, and stronger military by aggressively integrating technologies from the Fourth Industrial Revolution. This includes developing AI-based command and control systems, deploying unmanned and robotic combat platforms, and enhancing cyber and space capabilities to build a "high-tech, low-cost, high-efficiency" force.12 This technological modernization is specifically aimed at strengthening South Korea's indigenous "three-axis" defense system: the Kill Chain preemptive strike capability, the Korea Air and Missile Defense (KAMD), and the Korea Massive Punishment and Retaliation (KMPR) plan.12 This push for military innovation creates a virtuous cycle with South Korea's burgeoning defense industry, which has become a major global exporter of advanced weaponry, including to NATO countries like Poland.17

3.4 Reimagining North Korea Policy: Beyond Denuclearization

A pragmatic reassessment of North Korea policy is necessary. There is a growing consensus among regional analysts that the complete, verifiable, and irreversible denuclearization (CVID) of North Korea is not a realistic near-term objective, especially after the DPRK amended its constitution to enshrine its status as a nuclear weapons state.35 Therefore, a future-oriented strategy should pivot from the all-or-nothing goal of immediate denuclearization toward the more achievable objective of "stable coexistence." This approach would prioritize risk reduction, crisis management, and the prevention of miscalculation and accidental escalation.79 Potential diplomatic steps could include pursuing interim arms control agreements, such as a freeze on nuclear and missile testing in exchange for targeted sanctions relief; re-establishing military-to-military communication hotlines to de-escalate tensions; and using multilateral forums to manage the threat collaboratively.68 This strategy does not abandon the long-term goal of a denuclearized peninsula, but it recognizes the current reality and focuses on managing the immediate dangers.

Conclusion: From Disadvantage to Indispensability

The perception of South Korea's geopolitical position as "unfavorable" is grounded in a harsh and undeniable reality. The nation exists under the constant shadow of a nuclear-armed and hostile northern neighbor, is caught in the crosscurrents of an escalating great power rivalry, is constrained by unresolved historical animosities, and is functionally isolated as a strategic island dependent on vulnerable sea lanes. These are severe and persistent liabilities. However, this is an incomplete picture. This analysis demonstrates that these very challenges have been the catalysts for the development of extraordinary national strengths. South Korea's geopolitical condition is not one of simple disadvantage but of a high-stakes paradox, where immense vulnerability coexists with indispensable global influence. The existential threat fostered the ironclad US alliance; resource scarcity drove the creation of a world-leading technological economy; and its precarious position between giants necessitated a creative and sophisticated middle-power diplomacy. South Korea's path forward lies in mastering this paradox. It must continue to skillfully leverage its assets of power—its technological prowess, its cultural appeal, its diplomatic networks, and its robust alliance—to manage and mitigate the liabilities of its peril. Success will be measured by its ability to maintain strategic autonomy while strengthening its alliances, to de-risk its economy without catastrophic decoupling, and to manage the North Korean threat while pursuing a long-term, stable peace. By doing so, South Korea can complete its transformation from a nation defined by its precarious location to one defined by its pivotal and indispensable role in the 21st century. 참고 자료 Korea: A Geopolitical Overview - Brookings Institution, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/korea-a-geopolitical-overview/ South Korea's Geopolitics: Challenge and Strategic Choices - Toda Peace Institute, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://toda.org/policy-briefs-and-resources/policy-briefs/south-koreas-geopolitics-challenge-and-strategic-choices.html South Korea at the Crossroads – Security and Economic Regional Strategy in a Fluid Environment | Ifri, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ifri.org/en/south-korea-crossroads-security-and-economic-regional-strategy-fluid-environment South Korea's global geopolitical pivot - East Asia Forum, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://eastasiaforum.org/2024/01/15/south-koreas-global-geopolitical-pivot/ Korea and the New Geopolitics of Asia, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://korea.fes.de/our-work/korea-and-the-new-geopolitics-of-asia.html Korean Peninsula | Current Affairs & Analysis - Chatham House, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.chathamhouse.org/regions/asia-pacific/korean-peninsula The US-China Chip War and Prospects for South Korea-India Semiconductor Cooperation | The Journal of Indian and Asian Studies - World Scientific Publishing, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2717541323400041 The Role of South Korea in the U.S. Semiconductor Supply Chain Strategy, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.nbr.org/publication/the-role-of-south-korea-in-the-u-s-semiconductor-supply-chain-strategy/ Strong ties, high anxiety: The US-Korean alliance ahead of the 2024 election | Brookings, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/strong-ties-high-anxiety-the-us-korean-alliance-ahead-of-the-2024-election/ The Growth of South Korean Soft Power and Its Geopolitical Implications - Air University, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/JIPA/Display/Article/3212634/the-growth-of-south-korean-soft-power-and-its-geopolitical-implications/ Hallyu And Multitrack Diplomacy of South Korea by SM Entertainment | Permatasari | Kybernology : Journal of Government Studies, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/kybernology/article/view/9625 [Defense Innovation 4.0] Redesigning and reforming the entire field of defense with AI and advanced science and technology, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.mnd.go.kr/user/boardList.action?command=view&page=1&boardId=O_47261&boardSeq=O_306740&titleId=null&siteId=mndEN&id=mndEN_020100000000&column=null&search=null South Korea's Strategic Dilemma Amid US-China Competition - Stimson Center, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.stimson.org/2022/south-koreas-strategic-dilemma-amid-us-china-competition/ Japan–Korea disputes - Wikipedia, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan%E2%80%93Korea_disputes Resolving Tensions Between South Korea and Japan: An Essay Series, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.usip.org/programs/resolving-tensions-between-south-korea-and-japan-essay-series Territory and Sovereignty on the Korean Peninsula | Korea Institute - Harvard University, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://korea.fas.harvard.edu/event/territory-and-sovereignty-korean-peninsula South Korea moves away from former Indo-Pacific Strategy | East Asia Forum, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://eastasiaforum.org/2025/07/21/south-korea-moves-away-from-former-indo-pacific-strategy/ South Korea's Middle-Power Diplomacy: Changes and Challenges - Chatham House, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2016-06-22-south-korea-middle-power-kim.pdf Urea crisis sparks South Korean supply chain revamp - East Asia Forum, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://eastasiaforum.org/2024/08/23/urea-crisis-sparks-south-korean-supply-chain-revamp/ Featured Contribution: Korea's Role as a Facilitator of Trilateral Cooperation in Northeast Asia - CSIS, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.csis.org/analysis/featured-contribution-koreas-role-facilitator-trilateral-cooperation-northeast-asia Korean Peninsula: Strategic Crossroads in the Asia-Pacific Rivalry - SpecialEurasia, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.specialeurasia.com/2025/07/05/korean-peninsula-asia-pacific/ Why Korea is suddenly talking about Arctic shipping route, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10535436 North Korea Continues to Improve Nuclear Posture, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.38north.org/2025/07/north-korea-continues-to-improve-nuclear-posture/ North Korea and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korea_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction How will South Korea navigate US-China competition in 2025? - Brookings Institution, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-will-south-korea-navigate-us-china-competition-in-2025/ South Korea's Strategy toward the US–China Rivalry | Journal of East Asian Studies, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/5DA155812A32BFAC2E4A71962FC2D019 The Korean Peninsula: Make or Break? - CSIS, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.csis.org/analysis/korean-peninsula-make-or-break Bridging the Divide in the U.S.-South Korea Alliance - Center for American Progress, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.americanprogress.org/article/bridging-divide-u-s-south-korea-alliance/ The US-South Korea Trade Agreement: Opportunities and Challenges Ahead, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.brandinginasia.com/the-us-south-korea-trade-agreement-opportunities-and-challenges-ahead/ Countries with nuclear weapons - ICAN, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.icanw.org/nuclear_arsenals North Korea Justifies Nuclear Weapons Expansion - Arms Control Association, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2025-04/news/north-korea-justifies-nuclear-weapons-expansion Vol.131, No.6, 2025 North Korea's Military Industry Modernization and Russia-North Korea Technological Cooperation, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.inss.re.kr/upload/bbs/BBSA05/202506/F20250602154129173.pdf Warpower: North Korea - (August 2025), 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.warpowernorthkorea.com/ North Korea Conducts Nuclear Strike Drill - Arms Control Association, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2025-06/news/north-korea-conducts-nuclear-strike-drill North Korea Rejects Denuclearization Talks With US - The Diplomat, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://thediplomat.com/2025/07/north-korea-rejects-denuclearization-talks-with-us/ South Korea's Evolving Indo-Pacific Strategy - Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.swp-berlin.org/publikation/south-koreas-evolving-indo-pacific-strategy China's Growing Role and US Foreign Policy: S. Korea's Options in Shifting World Order, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.apln.network/news/member_activities/chinas-growing-role-and-us-foreign-policy-s-koreas-options-in-shifting-world-order South Korea and Chinese Conflict over THAAD: How it started and the way it ended, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349148524_South_Korea_and_Chinese_Conflict_over_THAAD_How_it_started_and_the_way_it_ended Moving On: China Resolves THAAD Dispute with South Korea - 38 North, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.38north.org/2017/11/abrahamianson110917/ “Rockets' Red Glare”—Why Does China Oppose THAAD in South Korea, and What Does It Mean for U.S. Policy?, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1736&context=nwc-review How South Korea sees technology competition with China and export controls | Brookings, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-south-korea-sees-technology-competition-with-china-and-export-controls/ U.S. chip battle with China catches South Korea in the crossfire - The Japan Times, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.japantimes.co.jp/business/2024/01/23/tech/us-chip-china-south-korea/ THE US-CHINA SEMICONDUCTOR WAR: HOW IT IMPACTS SOUTH KOREA'S TECH INDUSTRY | International Journal of Social Sciences Bulletin, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://ijssbulletin.com/index.php/IJSSB/article/view/799 Mending Historical Memory: Improving People-to-People Ties Between Japan and South Korea, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.fpri.org/article/2024/05/mending-historical-memory-improving-people-to-people-ties-between-japan-and-south-korea/ “COMFORT” WOMEN AND “UNCOMFORTABLE” EAST ASIAN GEOPOLITICS - National Maritime Foundation, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://maritimeindia.org/comfortwomen/ Lawsuits brought against Japan by former Korean "Comfort Women", 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://kls.law.columbia.edu/content/lawsuits-brought-against-japan-former-korean-comfort-women Geopolitical Risk on the Korean Peninsula － Implications for the Japan-U.S. Alliance － Jun Nagashima, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.mod.go.jp/asdf/meguro/center/Earpw05/1SpecialColumn.pdf Exploring South Korea's Major Ports: Gateways to Global Trade - FreightAmigo, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.freightamigo.com/blog/exploring-south-koreas-major-ports-gateways-to-global-trade/ South Korea's Challenges and Opportunities in the Indo-Pacific Economic Security - Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI), 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaip2421.pdf Maritime Silk Road - Wikipedia, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maritime_Silk_Road Building a New U.S.-Korea Technology Alliance: Strategies and Policies in an Entangled World, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/11/building-a-new-us-korea-technology-alliance-strategies-and-policies-in-an-entangled-world?lang=en The U.S.-ROK Relationship: An Alliance for the Greater Good, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://kr.usembassy.gov/120122-the-u-s-rok-relationship-an-alliance-for-the-greater-good/ Biden: U.S.-South Korea Alliance Key to Regional Security - DVIDS, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.dvidshub.net/news/507050/biden-us-south-korea-alliance-key-regional-security From K-pop to the KOSPI: trends shaping South Korea's economy | Macquarie Group, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.macquarie.com/us/en/insights/from-k-pop-to-the-kospi-trends-shaping-south-koreas-economy.html South Korea's Policy-Powered Renaissance: Betting on Semiconductors and Green Energy, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ainvest.com/news/south-korea-policy-powered-renaissance-betting-semiconductors-green-energy-2507/ Korea introduces special laws for battery and chip industry, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.korea-certification.com/en/korea-introduces-special-laws-for-battery-and-chip-industry/ Korea's Battery Industry: A Founding Year to Strengthen Core CompetenceView Details | Industry Focus | InvestKOREA(ENG), 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.investkorea.org/ik-en/bbs/i-308/detail.do?ntt_sn=490794 US chip leadership challenged as China's capabilities overtake Korea - TechHQ, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://techhq.com/news/us-chip-leadership-challenged-as-chinas-capabilities-overtake-korea/ South Korea as a techno-democratic power: strategic positioning and cooperation with the European Union - Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.frstrategie.org/en/programs/korea-security-and-diplomacy-program/south-korea-techno-democratic-power-strategic-positioning-and-cooperation-european-union-2025 Korean Wave as a Tool of Public Diplomacy: The Impact of South Korean Cultural Globalization in Indonesia from 2018 to 2023 - Jurnal, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://journal-stiayappimakassar.ac.id/index.php/Eksekusi/article/download/870/910 Korean Wave (Hallyu) Diplomacy - World Tribune, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.worldtribune.org/2025/korean-wave-hallyu-diplomacy/ The Hallyu Wave: South Korea's Secret Tool of Diplomacy - NIICE NEPAL, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://niice.org.np/archives/8020 The Hallyu Wave as a Strategic Soft Power Tool: South Korea's Cultural Diplomacy in the 21st Century - SciELO Preprints, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/download/12388/22757/23439 South Korea and the middle power revival school - Korea Economic Institute of America, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://keia.org/the-peninsula/south-korea-and-the-middle-power-revival-school/ New Approach of South Korea's Middle Power Diplomacy: Focusing on Global Agenda Setting, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.globalpoliticsreview.com/publications/2464-9929_v02_i02_p040.pdf Introducing the Indo-Pacific Strategy | Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Korea, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.mofa.go.kr/eng/wpge/m_26382/contents.do Shaping South Korea's middle-power future - East Asia Forum, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://eastasiaforum.org/2020/05/27/shaping-south-koreas-middle-power-future/ Lee Jae-myung's Pragmatic Diplomacy: Between Alliance and Autonomy | List of Articles | International Information Network Analysis, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.spf.org/iina/en/articles/lee_06.html South Korea Will Not Choose Between the US and China - The National Interest, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://nationalinterest.org/blog/korea-watch/south-korea-will-not-choose-between-the-us-and-china After Impeachment: Domestic Political Opportunities and Constraints in South Korean Foreign Policy - Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://apjjf.org/2025/8/park The Transformation of South Korean Progressive Foreign Policy, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/05/the-transformation-of-south-korean-progressive-foreign-policy?lang=en South Korea's Strategic Autonomy: Maintaining Regional Stability Amid US-China Competition | Asia-Pacific Leadership Network, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.apln.network/analysis/special-report/south-koreas-strategic-autonomy-maintaining-regional-stability-amid-us-china-competition Navigating Shifting Tides: South Korea and Northeast Asian Trade Integration, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.nbr.org/publication/navigating-shifting-tides-south-korea-and-northeast-asian-trade-integration/ Government's Key Semiconductor Industry Policies for 2024 - Kim & Chang, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.kimchang.com/en/insights/detail.kc?sch_section=4&idx=28909 South Korea - Defense Industry Equipment - International Trade Administration, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/south-korea-defense-industry-equipment North Korea's Grey Huddle: A Reverse Perspective of its Analog Military, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.isdp.eu/publication/north-koreas-grey-huddle-a-reverse-perspective-of-its-analog-military/ South Korea: Defense Reform and Force Enhancement Plans | DGAP, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://dgap.org/en/research/publications/south-korea-defense-reform-and-force-enhancement-plans The Conceptual Framework of Korean Defense Innovation 4.0: Transition to High-Tech Army in the Era of 4IR - Syracuse University, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://search.syr.edu/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_kiss_primary_4033485&context=PC&vid=01SYU_INST:SYU&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=Everything&query=sub%2Cequals%2Copen%20innovation%2CAND&mode=advanced&offset=10 Pursuing Stable Coexistence: A Reorientation of U.S. Policy Toward North Korea, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.usip.org/publications/2025/06/pursuing-stable-coexistence-reorientation-us-policy-toward-north-korea Policy Considerations on the Prospects of a US–North Korea Summit: American and South Korean Perspectives | Hudson Institute, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.hudson.org/security-alliances/policy-considerations-prospects-us-north-korea-summit-american-south-korean-patrick-cronin China and North Korea: evolving dynamics since the outbreak of the war in Ukraine, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.frstrategie.org/sites/default/files/documents/programmes/programme-coree-securite-diplomatie/publications/2025/03-2025.pdf North Korea Briefing, 8월 4, 2025에 액세스, https://www.38north.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/North-Korea-Briefing_2025-0731.pdf